Title: All Black People Spend Their Time Smoking Marijuana And Popping Out Babies! Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fElcADwoJI Published:Mar 18, 2013 Author:staff Post Date:2013-03-18 23:03:40 by Horse Keywords:None Views:1884 Comments:42
The title of this thread is the kind of stuff you'd read in a Critical Reasoning textbook where it doesn't teach you think but instead plants subliminals in the conscious mind. The seeds of disinformation. Such disinformation tactics are the kind used by CIA to sway people to a way of thinking that creates chaos. It starts with a seed. Be wary here. The First Amendment does not protect speech that incites civil violence.
The incitement of such speech falls under the Fighting Words doctrine which is not protected under the First Amendment. This comment does not pertain to Horse's thread at all but to the woman (named "Anna")from Moscow which the CNN anchorwoman was referring to. I sense that the Moscow lady responsible for the comment may be KGB.
Were I a journalist, I would have asked this "Anna" how long she has been in the U.S. and what is her occupation.
Go to your nearest police department and inquire about their notice to the public on their Hate Speech policy. Hate Speech is not protected by the First Amendment. And the police cannot be sued for somebody's speech which triggers violence. They have already given you Constructive and Actual Notice.
#35. To: purplerose, Original_Intent, GreyLmist (#12)
Go to your nearest police department and inquire about their notice to the public on their Hate Speech policy. Hate Speech is not protected by the First Amendment. And the police cannot be sued for somebody's speech which triggers violence. They have already given you Constructive and Actual Notice.
If someone is violent to someone else as a result of hearing speech of any sort, according to the law, they should be charged and convicted of assault, no?
If someone is violent to someone else as a result of hearing speech of any sort, according to the law, they should be charged and convicted of assault, no?
Yes. Speech Prohibition makes the ACLU, NAACP, ADL, SPLC, law enforcement, judicial and prison industries more profitable. I think that's the short list.
I couldn't say to the judge, "Well, Sir, he said he hated me so I punched him in the face." and not expect to be found guilty. I guess I'd have a hard time getting the other guy charged of hating me or saying he hates me or calling me hateful names.
Wtf.
The short list. You did leave out a lot of beneficiaries.
I couldn't say to the judge, "Well, Sir, he said he hated me so I punched him in the face." and not expect to be found guilty. I guess I'd have a hard time getting the other guy charged of hating me or saying he hates me or calling me hateful names.
That is correct. A minority might be found guilty and still get the other guy charged with a Hate Crime. Even stranger, Whites (usually meaning Caucasians of European descent in racial discussions) are a minority by far in the world.
The short list. You did leave out a lot of beneficiaries.
I figured that but a longer list would have taken more time than I wanted to expend on it.