Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Philly Mayor Wants Mag Punished over Race Relations Story
Source: American Renaissance
URL Source: [None]
Published: Mar 21, 2013
Author: Todd Starnes
Post Date: 2013-03-21 11:20:26 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 3337
Comments: 46

The Philadelphia Human Relations Commission has launched an investigation at the request of the mayor after a well-known magazine published an essay that explored perspectives of white citizens on the issue of race relations.

Mayor Michael Nutter called on the commission to consider rebuking both Philadelphia Magazine and writer Bob Huber noting that “the First Amendment, like other constitutional rights, is not an unfettered right.”

Nutter’s fury was directed at a cover story titled, “Being White in Philly.” The story included conversations with mostly anonymous residents who detailed race relations in the City of Brotherly Love.

And the mayor also had some choice words for the anonymous individuals who were interviewed–some of whom claimed to have been victims of crimes perpetrated by blacks. He said they were “too cowardly” to provide their names.

Tom McGrath, the magazine’s editor, told Fox News he is very concerned that the government is investigating his publication.

“I find it chilling that he now wants to use the government to censor a news outlet,” he said. “As a journalist – as someone who thinks free speech is really important–I find that really, really troubling.”

McGrath said he stands by the story and the author–and acknowledged it set off a firestorm.

McGrath said the mayor “seriously overreacted to the story” and “mischaracterized the piece and what it’s trying to do.”

“White people do not always feel comfortable talking about race,” he said. “There are some white folks who don’t feel their views on certain issues are welcome in the conversation.”

And critics believe–ironically–that the mayor’s reaction to the story validates that point.

Nutter wants the commission to consider whether the magazine’s essay was the “reckless equivalent of shouting ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater.”

“Only by debunking myth with fact, and by holding accountable those who seek to confuse the two, can we insure that the prejudices reflected in the essay are accorded the weight they deserve: none at all,” the mayor wrote.

McGrath did say he welcomed the mayor’s call for a city-wide discussion about race – but noted the announcement was rich with irony.

“I find it pretty bizarre,” he said. “At the same time he wants us rebuked, he’s saying we need to have a conversation about race in Philadelphia – which was our point in the first place.”

“His point seems to be that he’s allowed to talk about some of this stuff but that other people aren’t,” McGrath added.

[Editor's Note: Mayor Nutter's full letter can be found here. Below is the most troubling portion.

While I fully recognize that constitutional protections afforded the press are intended to protect the media from censorship by the government, the First Amendment, like other constitutional rights, is not an unfettered right, and notwithstanding the First Amendment, a publisher has a duty to the public to exercise its role in a responsible way. I ask the Commission to evaluate whether the “speech” employed in this essay is not the reckless equivalent of “shouting ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater,” its prejudiced, fact-challenged generalizations an incitement to extreme reaction.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

#1. To: purplerose (#0)

Please explain to me some more about your misunderstanding of the First Amendment.

Turtle  posted on  2013-03-21   11:21:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Turtle (#1)

And the mayor also had some choice words for the anonymous individuals who were interviewed–some of whom claimed to have been victims of crimes perpetrated by blacks. He said they were “too cowardly” to provide their names.

Oh I have absolutely NO misunderstanding of the First Amendment. And from the article I have quoted in part, the First Amendment does not protect speech that foments civil unrest. As far as I am concerned that anonymous individual named "Anna" may as well be an agent for the KGB and also working with our CIA to foment civil unrest.

You are aware (at least you should be) that we have Russian soldiers trained on American soil by our own CIA?

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-21   13:46:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: purplerose (#3)

Oh I have absolutely NO misunderstanding of the First Amendment.

You have shown you have no understanding of it at all. If some 85 IQ niggers are offended by the article and riot, then the article is hate speech and must be censored.

Turtle  posted on  2013-03-21   13:59:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Turtle (#6) (Edited)

If some 85 IQ niggers are offended by the article and riot then the article is hate speech and must be censored.

Which is why police departments have Hate Speech notices posted on their walls. Forewarned is forearmed. And should such speech result in riots, and the culprit ("Anna" from Moscow) responsible for making the comment is not dealt with then a class action lawsuit may be brought forward with several issues presented before the SCOTUS justices. Several issues that I would love to present in my brief would be the following:

1. Does hate speech have provided protections under the First Amendment?

2. When does hate speech fall within the category of the Fighting Words Doctrine?

purplerose  posted on  2013-03-21   14:10:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: purplerose, christine, James Deffenbach, Esso, BTP Holdings, Itistoolate, Jethro Tull, Original_Intent (#7)

Well, sweets, please consider that Dr. Bill Cosby and Jesse Jackson have both expressed the same concerns about hearing footsteps behind them at night and being relieved that they were white people, not young black males.

And, when college newspapers reprinted David Horowitz's, "Ten Reasons Why Reparations for Blacks is a Bad Idea for Blacks - and Racist Too" campus blacks and black leaders nationwide were unable to refute the points raised. Their reactions included destroying newspaper offices and demanding expulsions of newspaper publishers, writers and editors. None accepted the offers to respond in writing for publication at the time.

Kweisi Mfume (former president and CEO of NAACP) said of Bill Cosby's remarks that he only wished that Cosby hadn't spoken (the truth) in front of whites in attendance. So you see, some black leaders fully intend to ride the victimization mule until it dies, which is why American blacks are the greatest underachievers of any in the Diaspora, despite being the wealthiest blacks in the world.

The FBI compiles national crime stats and releases them annually in THE UNIFORM CRIME REPORTS.

The cold, hard stats speak for themselves, and whites in general (and in Philly in particular) are completely justified in their fear and disdain of blacks. It's a fact of life that in the scenic and beautiful Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the closer you get to Philadelphia the thicker the bullet resistant glass each time you stop for gasoline.

The last time I visited the city there were WANTED POSTERS on many poles for a cop from my county (NEW CASTLE) and I live 30 miles away in Delaware. That county police officer had made a successful arrest of a Philly black that resulted in conviction, so the cop was a marked man for any young black male with no fear of prison that wanted to "make his bones", (earn high status in prison for killing a white like Colin Ferguson) or earn gang membership.

It's not an advertised fact but there's a war on in Philly (remember the MOVE siege in 1985?) and any white can be targeted, which is why black leaders in the cities demanded that gun permits not include concealed carry in Philly and Pittsburgh. For many years that was the law and the unspoken reasoning behind it was, "it's better if whites are brutalized, robbed, raped or killed than for bruthas to be shot in the commission of those crimes."

The PA Legislature eventually came to its senses and not only repealed the limitations on carry permits, but they also passed one of the first laws that allows permit holders from reciprocal states to go armed anywhere in the commonwealth.

Your sensitivity and understanding of the plight of inner city blacks would not protect you from attacks either. The young woman who went to South Africa after college in order to aid Apartheid blacks was literally raped to death when set upon by the folks she went to help.

I mean no disrespect when I say that if you don't understand the nature of inner city American blacks your views will be met with skepticism at best, and scorn at worst. Even the attempt to extend constitutional protections to "street blacks" would likely be a waste of effort and possibly result in harm as you attempt to "make black folks white". Remember, that would mean that you represent the same system that jails and even executes blacks, and trying to sell that on the street could result in a violent attack and maiming, not unlike those when chimpanzees in Africa rip out arms and eyeballs of people who attempt to corral them.

Although I am a racist (which does not endear me to our beloved christine) I don't have to misrepresent any facts to make my case. Not only are blacks their own worst enemy, but they are encouraged by their own to attack and victimize whites as a crude form of "reparation payments on demand."

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2013-03-21   22:15:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: HOUNDDAWG (#19)

The PA Legislature eventually came to its senses and not only repealed the limitations on carry permits, but they also passed one of the first laws that allows permit holders from reciprocal states to go armed anywhere in the commonwealth.

That's some good news. Applause for Pennsylvania.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-03-21   22:48:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 21.

        There are no replies to Comment # 21.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest