[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

No place for hate apeech America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house. Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980 Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State Let her cry The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’ Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump 2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything) The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped. Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound) Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH... ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES Trump to send troops to Memphis Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out) Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Law would fire sheriffs for defying gun control measures
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://washingtonexaminer.com/law-w ... ntrol-measures/article/2525518
Published: Mar 27, 2013
Author: Paul Bedard
Post Date: 2013-03-27 14:24:21 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 466
Comments: 25

Supporters of the 380 sheriffs in 15 states who so far have vowed to defy new state and federal gun control laws claim that legislation is starting to pop up around the nation to fire any state elected or appointed law enforcement official who doesn't obey federal orders.

The first effort emerged in Texas. Legislation proposed by Dallas Democratic Rep. Yvonne Davis would remove any sheriff or law enforcement officer who refuses to enforce state or federal laws.

What's more, it would remove any elected or appointed law enforcement officer for simply stating or signing any document stating that they will not obey federal orders.

A gun lobbyist told Secrets, "Beware because once something like this is introduced in one state, it will be followed very quickly in several other states."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 24.

#18. To: Ada (#0)

Sheriffs take an oath to enforce the laws, not to do an end-run repeal of laws based on their own interpretation of the Constitution.

Shoonra  posted on  2013-03-28   22:49:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Sheriffs take an oath to enforce the laws, not to do an end-run repeal of laws based on their own interpretation of the Constitution.

From a Sheriff's Oath of Office: "I will support the Constitution of the United States and of this State."

Their job isn't to enforce whatever so-called "laws" are issued by rogue legislators that conflict with the Constitution of the United States and of their State.

What is an illegal order in your opinion, Shoonra? Is that just something WWII Germany's Military was expected to refuse?

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-03-29   9:27:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I haven't had much luck finding the official texts of sheriffs' oaths but I am pretty sure that it mentions enforcing the laws.

I don't need Barney Fife short-circuiting the Supreme Court with his own, untrained, interpretations of the Constitution.

Shoonra  posted on  2013-04-01   9:49:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't need Barney Fife short-circuiting the Supreme Court with his own, untrained, interpretations of the Constitution.

Well based on that how could you trust any law enforcement officer? The majority of them have limited to no familiarity with the Constitution.

Untrained ignorant interpretations of the law is what our police do. That is why it is a tyrannical police state. They have no idea what the law is they profess to enforce. That means they are just thugs with guns no different than Somalian gangs spouting whatever they want to justify whatever they feel like ... because sometimes they just dont even give enough of a shit to justify anything. Like with the majority of police related suicides.

So Shoonra,

YOU DON'T NEED BARNEY FIFE SHORT-CIRCUTING THE SUPREME COURT WITH HIS OWN, UNTRAINED , IGNORANT. INACCURATE INTERPRETATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION.

No, you don't need ignorant law enforcement.

You need a gun. It'll protect you much better. Or at lest get you out of the gene pool quicker , either way.

titorite  posted on  2013-04-01   10:31:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 24.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 24.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]