See other ObamaNation Articles
Title: We Don’t Need Obama’s Birth Certificate
Source:
The Western Center For Journalism
URL Source: http://www.westernjournalism.com/we ... need-obamas-birth-certificate/
Published: Apr 9, 2013
Author: Louise Hodges
Post Date: 2013-04-09 15:41:16 by Original_Intent
Ping List: *US INDUSTRIAL WAR MACHINE* Subscribe to *US INDUSTRIAL WAR MACHINE*
Keywords: O-ba-a-a-a-ama, Kenya, Fraud, Birth Certificate
Views: 482
Comments: 30
I have no use for Barack Obama. I don’t need a President with a history of drug abuse who puts the dreams of his father above the interests of the United States. Obama’s presidency is like a giant sinkhole, swallowing up everything we ever valued as Americans. It’s almost an insult to our intelligence, to ask us to believe that Obama is a US citizen. He has a schizophrenic timeline of unexplained foreign travel, a list of aliases, and uncomfortable friendships with communists and hostile governments. We can drop this debate over his birth certificate because we have something even more valuable. We have his mother’s passport files. Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport files were obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and then posted online. (Strunk v. US Department of State) When Obama was young, children traveled as an addition to their parents’ passports. Passport regulations required a photo of parent and child together, as well as a certified copy of a hospital birth certificate. State-issued IDs came much later. If Obama was born in the United States, as everybody says, then there should be a photo of little Barack Obama with his mother, as well as a certified copy of his Hawaiian birth certificate in her file. Surprise. There are no photos of little Barack Obama in the file. And of course, there is no birth certificate from any hospital in Hawaii. I know the passport laws for children. Obama’s mother and I would be approximately the same age if she survived. I filled out the very same passport applications for my own daughter, three years after Obama’s mother took him to Jakarta. The laws were the same for both of us. My daughter was born in an Army hospital in Japan in 1971, when my husband was in the Navy. I added her to my passport so I could bring her back to the United States. I remember it like it was yesterday because my ex-husband complained about how complicated it was. We had to go to the hospital and get a certified copy of her birth certificate, re-take my passport photo with my daughter, crop it until it fit the requirements, and then go all the way to the US Consulate in Tokyo and stand in line. If there was anything the man hated, it was anything that cost him money or inconvenienced him. I carried a joint passport for myself and my daughter through US Customs and Immigration in Hawaii. I can tell you from experience that if Obama’s mother tried to take her son through US Customs and Immigration in Hawaii without a joint passport for herself and her son, she would have been stopped. The obvious question is, who took him through US Customs and Immigration and helped him board the plane in Hawaii? And who brought him back? The only mention of little Barack Obama is when his mother tried to renew her passport at the US Consulate in Jakarta a few years later. We see evidence of that in the file. She tried to trick the passport office. She went to the US Consulate in Jakarta and wrote “Barack Obama” in the section where you add your child. She thought, like we did, that they were going to add him to her passport, no questions asked. They probably laughed and asked her how her son got to Jakarta without a US Passport. When she failed to go get this Hawaiian birth certificate and retake her photo, the Passport Office crossed out his name. She found herself stuck in Jakarta, trying to sneak her son back to the United States. All Congress has to do is ask the Passport Legal Office to explain how Obama’s mother took him through US Customs and Immigration without a US passport. I don’t see that happening. If there was a logical explanation, Obama should look forward to clearing his name. Or maybe we’ll get lucky, and he’ll just get on a helicopter and leave. 
Subscribe to *US INDUSTRIAL WAR MACHINE*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#4. To: Original_Intent (#0)
(Edited)
I have an unfair advantage because I worked in the US Passport Office in NYC, 1971-73. Up to about 1972 group passports were possible; husband & wife, mother & children, minor siblings, both parents and all the minor children. The rules changed then and it all switched to one person - one passport, even for babies. You might remember, before that change, there were these occasional news stories of small children who were somehow left behind in some strang foreign place and not allowed on an airplane to come home -- that was because the parent in a group passport had (possibly in an emergency) had flown back to the US without the kid who was on the same passport and, without a passport where he was - which meant he couldn't be on another passport elsewhere - the kid was stuck. It would require either the parent flying back (not always possible because this time the kid on the passport was going with her) or else first cancelling the kid off mama's passport and then getting photos and a passport all his own. The change of rules eliminated that craziness. So back when Obama was a baby he didn't NEED to be on the same passport as his mama, he could have had a passport all to himself (and after 1972 he'd have to do it that way). Knowing that he was not Required to be on the same passport with his mother sort of blows apart this woman's whole theory. Back around 1971, in Jakarta, Mama Obama filled out some passport papers, evidently to renew her own passport (which apparently had expired), and mentioned baby Barack as someone she was Excluding. Meaning he had been on her passport until then -- he wouldn't have been on her passport (or on one of his own) to begin with unless the State Dept had first been shown his US birth certificate. And, having seen his birth certificate and put him on her passport previously, the Passport Office did not have to be shown his birth certificate a second time for the new passport just for Barack - he had been on one US passport already, and the paperwork for that passport should be in the State Dept files, so he didn't need to show other proof of citizenship to be on a new passport. If baby Barack hadn't been on someone's US passport (his own or his mother's) to get from Hawaii to Indonesia, the Jakarta Embassy would NEVER have issued him a passport of his own.
#5. To: Shoonra, all (#4)
You can of course produce evidence of such a passport? At the same level of rigor as his "Birth Certificate" I presume?
so you swabbed the bathrooms there also!?!
stories of small children who were somehow left behind in some strang foreign place and not allowed on an airplane to come home LOL......working as a grunt in the Passport Office 40 years ago equates to "expert" status? Oh yes, surely all remember the epidemic of small children left behind in strange lands. Weren't they using cattle prods on the tarmac to keep those children off the planes?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 4.
#9. To: Shoonra (#4)
I have an unfair advantage because I worked in the US Passport Office in NYC, 1971-73.
#24. To: Shoonra (#4)
I have an unfair advantage because I worked in the US Passport Office in NYC, 1971-73.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.