Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: Early Evidence Indicates Boston Bombing Was a False Flag
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04 ... rathon-bombing-false-flag.html
Published: Apr 15, 2013
Author: Brandon Turbeville
Post Date: 2013-04-15 23:27:09 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 3676
Comments: 27

Only hours after two bombs were detonated near the finish line of a Boston marathon, evidence is beginning to emerge suggesting that the act may have been a false flag attack.

While reports continue to emerge from the scene, a number of facts point toward the typical setup used to devise, control, and execute such an attack as took place around the 9/11, 7/7, and OKC bombings as well as the Aurora and Sandy Hook shootings.

One of the hallmark signals of a false flag attack, as Webster Tarpley has expertly demonstrated in his book, 9/11 Synthetic Terror, is the use of drills acting as a cover for sinister plans and mechanizations within the halls of the shadow government itself which ultimately manifest as false flag terror attacks. Much like the aforementioned attacks, the Boston Bombing also carried the trademark “coincidence” of a drill scheduled to take place at almost exactly the same time that the bombs were being detonated at the marathon.

For instance, earlier in the morning of April 15, 2013, the Boston Globe tweeted “Officials: There will be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities.”

In addition, it was reported by Business Insider in the article “2 More Explosive Devices Found At Boston Marathon,”[1] that a police scanner “said police were going to do a third, controlled explosion on the 600 Block of Boylston Street.”

Yet, despite the fact that the police had scheduled a highly “coincidental” explosion at the JFK Library, much of the mainstream reports regarding the device have presented it as another part of the Boston Bombing itself.

In fact, the New York Post reported almost the polar opposite of the Boston Globe in regards to the second device. It said, “Police confirmed a third explosion at JFK Library in Boston. Boston fire officials confirmed during a press conference that the third explosion was linked to the ones that occurred at the Marathon. There were no injuries reported from the third bombing.”

Andrew Katz of TIME tweeted that “police were investigating reports of bombs in other parts of the city,” and "Citing a police scanner, Katz tweeted that there was an ‘incendiary device’ possible at JFK Library as well as ‘another device’ in front of Boston’s luxury Mandarin Hotel."

Business Insider also reported that, around 3 p.m., there was a fire inside the JFK Library but states that it was not related to the “terrorist bombings.” This, as I mentioned, is in direct contradiction to the later reports that the “fire” was actually an explosion related to the terror bombing.

Thus, we have a device planted inside the library by the police and confirmation that an explosion at the library was connected to the Boston Bombing. This fact alone should be enough to raise questions regarding the individuals responsible for the bombing. If the police had planted a device inside the Library and the explosion was related to the Boston Bombing, should there not be an immediate investigation of the police?

It should also be noted that Chris Faraone of the Boston Phoenix also tweeted that a police officer near the finish line stated, “There are secondary devices that have been found and are unexploded.”

Also interesting, however, is the fact that the University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, Ali Stevenson, stated that bomb sniffing dogs were present at both the start and finish lines.

Speaking to Local 15, the local Boston news station, Stevenson stated, “They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.”

At this time, law enforcement officials state that they have identified a suspect, a Saudi national currently in the hospital for shrapnel wounds. One must also wonder if this individual is nothing more than a mere patsy in yet another government-sponsored false flag. It is highly dubious that an individual (with the exception of a suicide bomber which this individual’s survival excludes him from) setting off such powerful bombs would stand so close to them as to be injured by shrapnel.

Ali Stevenson also stated that there was no doubt in his mind that the bombings were intentional and this much is quite clear.

The question, however, is who was behind them?

As Mike Adams of Natural News writes, “It’s far too early to take an informed guess on all this. However, it is indisputable that the FBI is actively engaged in carrying out bomb plots in the United States, then halting them at the last minute to “catch the terrorists.” This fact has been covered by the New York Times, among other publications.”

Indeed. And the track record of the FBI, as well as other elements of the governmental establishment, should be reason enough for us to continue watching these developments and the subsequent claims made by these agencies and individuals.

Notes: [1] This article could not be retrieved by the writer at 6:45 pm.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

#16. To: christine, All, *9-11* (#0)

Already, the 'official releases' are being adjusted to fit the "truth" stream of 'common' observations, ala 9-11. The 'casualty' figures don't make sense; unless they are including week old band-aid wounds and mental-emotional trauma. If so, that's more 9-11 style 'official propaganda.'

Nothing has yet been said about the third plume - or its timing - if that was supposed to be the police "test drill" event. Given the long memories of 9-11, I can't feature any 'government' organization potentially risking the 'tourism' damage to such a famous event. That would have required approval, all the way to the mayor's office. (Fuggetaboutit!) I can imagine the 'first-responders' being pre-located and revved-up; ala 9-11 & FEMA.

Pressure cookers & ball bearings? Without some serious forensic sanitizing, those components beg for tracing - they are not common enough.

Pressure cookers? Good luck putting one in a back-pack. Duffle bag? What duffle bag doesn't scream ".... look at me!" on a sidewalk - with spectators tripping over them? Placed inside a garbage can of some type? Possibly, but there would have been too many witnesses to the 'placements' - unless the "kitchen timer" was calibrated with a span of around four hours - or more. The spectators would probably have probably started gathering on the order of eight hours before the expected finish time; just to get a good seat/location.

Ball bearings? Just not likely - except for sensationalism. Common screws, nuts and bolts would do far more physical, mental and emotional damage than ball bearings; and be more difficult to trace. The "usual suspects" would have included rat poison. Oh, did I also mention that with any reasonably expected number of ball bearings, the "official" devices would be heavy as hell?

Without sophisticated assembly (i.e., epoxied to the outside walls) the purported ball bearings would 'pool' at the bottom of the container - with little force-vector available to propel them to maximize harm. Looking at the news videos and alleged design, the amount of explosive would have been small, as well. (A pressure cooker would have been a very 'efficient' container, for the purpose.) The reasonably presumed explosive force would have been too small to hurl 'pooled' ball bearings very far.

Kitchen timers? Not of the spring-wound mechanical variety. Imagine the time limitation (presumed to be under an hour) and complexity of setting one, before placing the bombs - and reasonably synchronized at that.

However, there are plenty of common digital timers available which would be adequate to the 'timing' job - some marketed as "kitchen timers." If timed to the "police drill;" (however convenient to the occasion) who would know of the timing; that closely? Way too convenient.

The key forensic detail will be in the detonators, whatever their type, source and design. That assumes a truly competent investigation, of course.

Just the video news coverage of the main location would dissuade any 'regular' perpetrator; add the potential for security cameras, camcorders, cell phone cameras, etc.

Spectator bleachers available? There's your obvious 'terror' target - but that didn't happen. Again, as bad as it was, too many people were spared, ala 9-11.

I'm speculating that this will go the way of the "anthrax" attacks, associated with 9-11. Why? Because too many key "official" details are being broadcast.


As with 9-11, we are compelled to ask: "Who benefits?"

My guess? The infamous "New World Order." At a minimum, the Boston bombings made for a great 'population control' resource response and deployment exercise. Oh, we shouldn't forget the 'test' value of the "snitch line" response. (AND the response of forums, such as this.)

My personal recommendation: Everybody keep an eye on 'new' legislation; whether 'gun control' or otherwise.

SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2013-04-16   16:46:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 16.

#17. To: SKYDRIFTER (#16)

I say how dare any boston police go along with any bullshit act of the story....

IF ANY ONE OF THOSE SOB COOPERATE WITH THE GOVERNMENT RUN BULLSHIT STORY THEN OFF WITH THEIR HEADS AS TRAITORS COMPLICIT TO THE MURDER OF US CITIZENS!

Let us not tolerate this terrorist nation that commits these false flag. Let us not tolerate their thug minions. Let us not tolerate this.

titorite  posted on  2013-04-16 17:24:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: SKYDRIFTER (#16)

Excellent - thanks.

Lod  posted on  2013-04-16 17:25:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest