The woman is a hallucinating Konspiracist Krackpot. I watched the video over and over and could find nothing.
Right, no blood trail, despite just having his legs blown off, where is the blood? I think the actors thought everyone knew it was all a regular bombing drill, then later found out that it was much more involved and was actually a drill for martial law as well.
I am completely and utterly disgusted by you necrophiliac ghouls who try to score your conspiracist crackpot points on a man who lost his legs. Only a truly sick, soulless person thinks everything in the world is a conspiracy.
This does not appear to be at the Boston Marathon - no smoke, no debris, no ambulances or other emergency vehicles on the scene, does not appear to be filled with panicky people, etc. If so, I'd like someone to identify the address.
If this guy had been injured in a blast 'only moments ago' he wouldn't already be in a wheelchair and capable of sitting up while someone pushed him around a street corner. A person who was amputated that day would not already have a prosthetic.
This took place at another date and place, the man might be impaired but it wasn't from something only minutes before.
Having spent two hours looking at this video and comparing it with other photos of the Boston bombing ... YES, it took place at the Boston Marathon. My estimate is that it was filmed within ten minutes of the explosions. The man in the wheelchair is Jeff Bauman, the civilian running beside the wheelchair is Carlos Arrendando, a Red Cross volunteer and peacenik who was the first to reach him and put on the tourniquets. Bauman had lost both legs in the explosions. He remained conscious at least until they got him in an ambulance, and as soon as he came to, he was able to describe the bombers.
There is at least one still photo of this scene, but it usually was cropped in publications because the view of Bauman's shattered leg is so upsetting.
No hoax. The image is real. I am not sure what that third man (in the yellow EMT jacket) was doing; whether he was picking up something or fastening something or maybe just trying to help them get Bauman to an ambulance while he was still conscious. But it's no hoax.
To me, it seems like there's a lot of groupthink going on around here, where if certain individuals make a claim, MANY here chime in and tell them how smart they are and nod their collective heads in agreement, whether it's complete bullshit or not.
There's no critical thinking or any sort of analysis anymore, just a bunch of people jumping to conclusions with little or no evidence to back up their claims.
I'm pretty sure that things are NOT how the "official" story claims things to be, yet at the same time, I'm pretty sure there WERE people who were seriously injured and killed at the Boston Marathon.
The idea that "actors" would stage such a thing, and that hospital workers, ambulance drivers, and the people of Boston who were there would all go along with such a plan to "fake" this event is beyond ludicrous.
Those who plan these events have NO qualms about killing or maiming REAL people, they have ZERO need to "fake" anything.
With the onslaught of horrific events over the past several decades some people just can't deal with it any longer and resort to a fantasy world within their minds where they convince themselves that none of it is real, it is all "faked" and staged with hired actors, no matter what the event.
It brings them back to a comfort zone which they can deal with rather than dealing with the real world. It's a means of escape from the world they would rather not live in and have no control over.
I suppose it's a self defense mechanism which helps them cope.
It's not helping things any, but I suppose for them, living in denial is easier than seeing things as they actually are.
The following article isn't Boston. It's about Sandy Hook. In my opinion, Laurie Roth asks some damn good questions. It doesn't pass the smell test and was, imo, a staged event. I think the same about Boston. I'm sure that the brothers are CIA operatives/patsies. That's enough for me to be dubious about the whole thing including the wheelchair man who, imo, would have looked a hell of a lot bloodier and in far worse condition after having both legs blown off and a femoral artery severed. If that makes me nuts for being suspicious, then so be it.
That's enough for me to be dubious about the whole thing including the wheelchair man who, imo, would have looked a hell of a lot bloodier and in far worse condition after having both legs blown off and a femoral artery severed. If that makes me nuts for being suspicious, then so be it.
Thing is christine, what's easier to pull off, staging a REAL event, or staging a FAKE one? Why bother with involving scores of "actors" to fake being injured when it's so much easier to REALLY hurt uninvolved people?
There was no control over who would be in the area of the blast at any one point in time. And what about the dead people and those in the hospital with real injuries?
i'm not saying that there are no real victims. of course there are, but, again, if you believe it was a staged event, which i do, then that could also include the use of actors.
i don't know, but i'm not going to close my mind to any possibility.
here: The criticism about the blood is absolutely legitimate. It is emphasized over, and over, and over again that arterial bleeding must be stopped or your victim will be dead in a matter of minutes. An injury of that type would have severed the femoral artery in the leg. Unstaunched you are dead in less than 2 minutes and there would be massive amounts of blood spread around the site of the victim with the blown off legs. There was not only no blood but the victim was conscious. It is highly unlikely that the victim would still be conscious after massive blood loss. Even if the bleeding was sealed off with a tourniquet withing 30 seconds the blood loss should have been enough to render the victim comatose and in deep shock. The victim in the chair appears to be reasonably alert. Adrenalin can do strange things but it cannot replace lost blood. --OI
What questions are you trying to get answered Ben? I read through this, I'm pretty sure I only saw one question, and you answered it yourself shortly after. It doesn't look like you're asking questions, just posting a few pictures where it's really hard to tell what's going on, and trying to use them as proof that they were actors and fake prosthetic amputee legs, while throwing very, very, very simplified and pretty much incorrect medical info in there to try to prove your point.
First off, stop saying people were getting spinal assessments and strapped into "spine board stretchers". There isn't a single backboard in any of these pictures, not one. That alone should start tipping people off that you really don't know what you're talking about. And stop using the apparent reactions and facial expressions of the people in the picture, and the EMS personnel ignoring the double leg amputee and going for the people around him, as proof. For starters, these are pictures, you can't exactly gauge people's behavior from a few still photos. After a huge concussive blast goes off right next to you, you're gonna be disoriented and confused, and you're gonna be distracted from your injuries. I do strongly agree that EMS should have treated the double amputee first, and he should be the first person we see on a stretcher, but just because the EMT's and paramedics didn't follow protocol isn't proof that it's all fake.
And stop trying to tell people you're gonna bleed out in seconds and die from below the knee amputations. If you sever your femoral artery while it's still the femoral artery, you have a huge risk of bleeding out, but they quickly branch into about 4 different main branches in each leg by the time they get to the knee, and the vast majority of blood from the femoral arteries goes to the quads and then right back up through the femoral veins. If it was a clean cut at the knee, you would still have at least a minute, probably a few minutes, before you bleed out, and that's if you do nothing to stop the bleeding. Small arteries have enough musculature to reflexively contract and provide some resistance to lower the blood flow to them to reduce bleeding out if they're badly damaged. The guy had plenty of time and ability to have direct manual pressure applied before the tourniquet can be tied.
It's good to ask questions, and it's good to not believe everything the media tells you. And there's a lot of questions about the involvement of the FBI, so I like seeing people actually really pushing for answers to pressing questions. But you're not doing any of that, you're taking a few bigfoot-esque photos, claiming there are things happening in them that nobody can see, and then using bullshit pseudoscience to prove that they had some extremely elaborate set up to make fake victim actors. It's nutfucks like you that take the conspiracies too far that make the rest of the sane people that acknowledge the government and media lie to us look like we're all a bunch of loonies. Stop spreading bullshit, don't take a few pics and claim they're evidence of an elaborate set-up when they clearly aren't. All it does is hamper the efforts to actually find out the truth and get questions answered.
And before you take the insecure little bitch route again and tell everyone my IP address and name and then google maps where I am and some local landmarks, my name is Jake Frier, I'm a former EMT and current medical student in Syracuse. Why don't you try to keep the arguments on your shitty little blog professional and on-topic, and don't resort to exposing people's names and locations you little freak.
here's a good comment (i am being openminded) to this article