[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Disorder in the American Courts
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 25, 2013
Author: .
Post Date: 2013-04-25 23:58:50 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 370
Comments: 16

These are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts and are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and published by court reporters that had the torment of staying calm while the exchanges were taking place.

ATTORNEY: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning? WITNESS: He said, 'Where am I, Cathy?'
ATTORNEY: And why did that upset you?
WITNESS: My name is Susan!


ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there.
ATTORNEY: What is your date of birth?
WITNESS: July 18th.
ATTORNEY: What year?
WITNESS: Every year.
ATTORNEY: How old is your son, the one living with you?
WITNESS: Thirty-eight or thirty-five, I can't remember which.
ATTORNEY: How long has he lived with you?
WITNESS: Forty-five years.
ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS: I forget..
ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?
ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?

ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the 20-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS: He's 20, much like your IQ.


ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Are you shitting me?
ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: Getting laid

ATTORNEY: She had three children , right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
WITNESS: Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a new attorney?


ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death..
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS: Take a guess.

ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard
ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?
WITNESS: Unless the Circus was in town I'm going with male.


ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.
ATTORNEY: Doctor , how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS: All of them. The live ones put up too much of a fight.
ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS: Oral...
ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 PM
ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: If not, he was by the time I finished.
ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Are you qualified to ask that question?


And last:

ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No..
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.


Poster Comment:

In the trial I have been watching, State of Arizona v. Jodi Ann Arias, the woman who plays the role of a defense attorney is every bit as dumb as any of this would indicate. She asked one witness if he couldn't get any information from the victim who has been dead since 2008. Apparently the stupid bitch thought the witness could hold a seance and ask him questions. Unbelievable!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

#3. To: James Deffenbach (#0)

This is an incredible find, James! As really funny to read these statements are as recorded in court, it's also disturbing and makes me re-think about our so-called professional people in the court and forensics field. You really do have to question their intellect anymore.

purplerose  posted on  2013-04-26   14:18:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: purplerose (#3)

Yes, it's scary to think that these people, supposedly some of the brightest amongst us, actually represent people in court. Most people could probably do about as well representing themselves.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2013-04-26   19:29:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: James Deffenbach (#4)

A good friend of mine who works in the scientific community did his own divorce and represented himself in court! He prevailed.

purplerose  posted on  2013-04-27   16:54:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: purplerose (#5)

There is no good reason why most people shouldn't be able to represent themselves. You know that old saying that "he who represents himself has a fool for a client"? I am convinced that old adage was made up by lawyers hoping to fool people into thinking they alone could help them with their legal issue, whatever it happened to be. I am also convinced that in many matters most people could do just as well on their own and sometimes much better. I mean, would anyone with a lick of common sense ask a psychologist (or anyone) if they couldn't get information/ask questions of a DEAD MAN? I saw that happen live just last week.

And the other defense lawyer in that case is just as bad, they're both nuts. One of them (the woman) usually represents people who have DUI charges. The other one usually represents people who have been charged with some type of sex crime (child molestation, rape, things like that). And yet here they are representing someone in a trial for murder. Doubt that anyone could do much in this case, the woman who killed the guy did way too much talking when she was arrested and told three different stories about what happened.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2013-04-27   17:30:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: James Deffenbach (#6)

I won my first lawsuit when I was 23 in a contract law case where a breach of contract took place between myself and the employer. I had made the contractual agreements stating (I was to produce a stage performance) and the purchaser agreed to the terms and signed the deal before I even set foot on stage. Upon my actual performance, they decided to get slick with me and re-nigged on the agreement and I wound up having to take them to court. The court paid for my travel expenses as well as actual performance acted upon by myself. The owner thought I was some idiot off the street. I proved him wrong. I never attended any formal schooling. Just plain common sense here is all that I acted upon. And that is...trust nobody in the business world cause they all want to screw you.

purplerose  posted on  2013-04-27   17:48:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: purplerose, lod, james deffenbach (#7)

...trust nobody in the business world cause they all want to screw you

True that not everyone is immoral and may necessarily want to cheat/steal from others in business; however, business is business, and it is indeed good to assume that the corp. or whomever may TRY to do it. most of us dont personally know who owns/runs all the outfits we deal with daily. So therefore, of course anyone with sense will C.Y.A. I think that is what rose is saying.

also, from my perspective, its true that many outfits are indeed untrustworthy. that is why there is no "trust" needed. put it in the written contract, or it doesnt exist.

You always hear gripes about our 'sue happy' society, but from the time i first becaame an adult i learned that court or threats of court is often the only mechanism to enforce a moral order in society. People are simply not decent on their own (

pardon me for a moment :-) concupiscence:

Human nature was deprived of both its preternatural and supernatural gifts and graces, the lower appetite began to lust against the spirit, and evil habits, contracted by personal sins, wrought disorder in the body, obscured the mind, and weakened the power of the will, without, however, destroying its freedom. Hence that lamentable condition of which St. Paul complains when he writes:

I find then a law, that when I have a will to do good, evil is present with me. For I am delighted with the law of God, according to the inward man: but I see another law in my members, fighting against the law of my mind, and captivating me in the law of sin, that is in my members. Unhappy man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of this death? (Romans 7:21-25)

Christ by His death redeemed mankind from sin and its bondage. In baptism the guilt of original sin is wiped out and the soul is cleansed and justified again by the infusion of sanctifying grace. But freedom from concupiscence is not restored to man, any more than immortality; abundant grace, however, is given him, by which he may obtain the victory over rebellious sense and deserve life everlasting )

Artisan  posted on  2013-04-27   19:20:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Artisan (#13)

Good thoughts - thanks.

I enter dealing with others with a neutral position.

Hoping for the best, but not being surprised at the worst.

Engaging, or not, is up to me; based on my perception (right or wrong) of the second party.

Lod  posted on  2013-04-27   20:42:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Lod (#14)

"I enter dealing with others with a neutral position."

I use my streetsense ability.

"Hoping for the best, but not being surprised at the worst."

Business is like marriage. If you engage in choices made on "neutrality", you're setting yourself up for trouble. You need to check out your partners, (know them well) before getting involved. Example here: A friend of mine once owned an icecream company. One day, one of their friends and father came along and made an offer to go into business with my friend who trusted them with their word as the offer (never thought of hiring an attorney to aid them in this business transaction). My friend never realized what was to happen next. They got an attorney and took my friends ice cream business right from under their nose, trademark and everything. My friend would have been a millionnaire today and never had to work again had they never trusted this so-called "friend" and father. The mistake my friend made was relying on their word. That friend and father pair were probably laughing their asses off all the way to the bank. All based on their word "Trust me" In streetsense, the expression "Trust me" translates to FU.

And you say I'm still paranoid?

purplerose  posted on  2013-04-27   22:02:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 15.

#16. To: purplerose (#15)

And you say I'm still paranoid?

Just observing, that's all.

Lod  posted on  2013-04-27 22:29:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 15.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]