[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

"Gestapo" Müller - Hunting Hitler's Secret Police Chief

How Michelle Obama Could Become Democrats' Nominee after Biden's Terrible Debate, with Steve Bannon

Was This Lethal Spitfire Ace Killed by His Own Tactics?

Welsh Police Pay Home Visit To Man For Displaying Reform UK Political Sign

Liz Harrington Drops a BOMBSHELL on How Georgia Was Stolen

Trudeau govt to make all bathrooms in Parliament buildings GENDER NEUTRAL

French official admits censorship is needed for government to control public opinion

Bill Maher Predicts Trump Victory: The Left Is Aggressively Anti-Common Sense

Google is suppressing Blaze Media. Heres how you can help.

Large-scale prisons being secretly erected in all 50 states will they be used to house illegals or force Americans into concentration camps?

Hezbollah is ready to confront Israels military, with Jon Elmer

Balloons Land in Southern Lebanon, Warning Locals the Land Belongs to Jews

German Politician Hit With Hate Crime Investigation For Demanding Migrant Criminals Be Deported

DNC Caught Funneling Millions to Law Firms Involved in Unprecedented Lawfare Campaign Against Trump

Here Are The 20 Biggest Whoppers Biden Told During His Debate With Trump

NYC to ban cellphones in public schools.

New York Times Columnists Turn On Biden After Disastrous Debate Performance

8 Armed Men With Venezuelan Accents Violently Rob Denver Jewelry Store

Uvalde Police School Chief Indicted, Arrested Over Response To 2022 Shooting

Greetings from the Horse

Tonight confirmed every Democrats worst fear.

Five Women Soon To Die In 1928

How Trump Can Lose The Debate

Tucker Carlson Savagely Dismantles ‘Dumb’ and ‘Stupid’ Far-Left Reporter at Australian Freedom Conference

James Clapper, Mr. October Surprise: How Obama's Intel Czar Rigged 2016 And 2020 Debates Against Trump

Biden Campaign Balks Wont Commit to Drug Test

S-500 Prometheus: Designed To Kill Stealth Jets, ICBMs

The US military chases shiny new things and the ranks suffer

USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Now in the Med, USS Theodore Roosevelt Heads to the Middle East

Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi mocks Democrat judge acting like a ‘confused simpleton’


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Boston Marathon: Federal Horror Movie By Ron Avery
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 26, 2013
Author: my friend, Ron Avery
Post Date: 2013-04-26 00:59:02 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 11519
Comments: 320

You no longer have to go to stuffy dark theaters to watch a new movie complete with special effects like explosions and injured people with limbs blown off with real live cops, FBI, CIA, SWAT, Blackwater, Craft, Navy Seals, Special Ops, and a cast of thousands. You might even get a bit part in it yourself if you’re there when the Director yells “action!”

Did you see the guy that had both his legs blown off below the knee? Talk about gory! That was even sicker than the soldier that had his arm severed off and looks around for it and picks it up and walks on the beech with it in his other hand in Saving Private Ryan. Well that was a real amputee that was in that movie and can be hired from amputeesinaction.co.uk.

Do you think you could have both of your legs blown off below the knee and 10 to 12 inches of your leg bone exposed and ligaments, muscle and flesh hanging out all around it with no blood dripping from it and be sitting up and a wheel chair looking around at the sites while being rolled down the street? Do you think you could quietly lie on your side with enough strength to hold your head off the pavement while others with far less sever injuries are attended to? The pain alone from this injury would render the victim unconscious. This is what happens when you let amateurs run the movie set. Steven Spielberg would not have saved these scenes and would have re-shot them until they were plausible and convincing.

Then you have the FBI come on the scene and announce that they need our help by sending in our pictures and movies to see if there are any clues to this “who done it.” Then only hours later they come back and tell us they have figured it out and not to look at any other pictures. The FBI directs everyone to go to FBI.gov to see two pictures of two guys with backpacks and to look for them only. The pictures that are released on the internet at youtube show many men wearing kaki pants and dark coats with black backpacks but these turn out to be private and government special ops guys all over the place. Turns out that the shredded backpack the “bomb” was alleged to be in was not the same color nor had the same markings that are shown on the two suspects but resemble the backpack on one of the special ops guys.

By now you are locked into this movie and you can’t wait to see the end. The plot becomes much deeper when the whole city of Boston is locked down and paramilitary police, SWAT, Homeland Security with armored vehicles and M-16s invade private homes without warrant and search whole neighborhoods looking for two brothers. And after what we are told was a wild chase scene complete with explosives and gun fire, one of the suspects is apprehended and forced to take off all his closes. They at least fuzz out his genitals for the young in the audience. The next scene shows the FBI leading him away naked in hand cuffs and putting him in a car. He looks in fine health and no one can deny it because you see it on screen. And just when you think it is about over. . . BAM! We learn the first suspect has been killed and when they show the body it is horrible. His whole face is one large bruise all the way down and extending over his right shoulder. He has a large 8 inch severe laceration in his left rib cage that is open about two inches and clearly cut through all outer layers of tissue to the lung itself. He had two other large gashes on the same side. This man was obviously beaten and tortured beyond comprehension while in protective custody!

Hey wait a minute! Anybody that is still watching this show should be awake by now if they have any brain waves at all. Law enforcement can’t harm and they damn sure can’t kill disarmed, handcuffed, naked suspects and they can’t allow other people to kill them or even touch them. Hey, we aren’t in Kansas anymore Buddy! There’s some real bad tyranny going down here in OZ.

So why is the government not after the FBI or police who killed the suspect while in custody? Not one word about this on Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Piers Morgan, Anderson Cooper or any of the other lame-stream tongue slingers. When something like this happens, everyone in the unit that arrested the suspect who was killed in custody should be charged with conspiracy to commit murder and stand trial for capital punishment. And those of the accused who aid in any prosecution evidence leading to the main actors should be given a pardon.

This means our so-called federal government and most state governments are beyond repair and salvation to let this kind of B-grade Federal Hollywood stunt at the Boston Marathon lead to the declaration of Martial Law over the whole city where troops go house to house pulling out residents and searching with out a warrant and causing bodily harm to both suspects while in protective custody and torturing one of them to death. Neither suspect was injured at the time of the arrest. Outrageous! Every citizen of Boston should be in the street with their guns demanding answers to this! In fact everyone in this nation should be in the street with their guns asking for answers!

Ron Avery is a semi-retired architect, author and speaker on topics regarding Christian theology and the principles of property that regulate every aspect of lawful government.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 285.

#23. To: christine (#0)

Did you see the guy that had both his legs blown off below the knee? Talk about gory! That was even sicker than the soldier that had his arm severed off and looks around for it and picks it up and walks on the beech with it in his other hand in Saving Private Ryan. Well that was a real amputee that was in that movie and can be hired from amputeesinaction.co.uk.

Do you think you could have both of your legs blown off below the knee and 10 to 12 inches of your leg bone exposed and ligaments, muscle and flesh hanging out all around it with no blood dripping from it and be sitting up and a wheel chair looking around at the sites while being rolled down the street? Do you think you could quietly lie on your side with enough strength to hold your head off the pavement while others with far less sever injuries are attended to? The pain alone from this injury would render the victim unconscious. This is what happens when you let amateurs run the movie set. Steven Spielberg would not have saved these scenes and would have re-shot them until they were plausible and convincing.

So christine, when are you going to tell everyone that you verified that Jeff Bauman is a real person?

When is anyone else going to take the time to find out that they've all been disparaging a guy who's just had his legs blown off FOR REAL?

How many people here can honestly say they've been in a combat zone and have seen people with their legs blown off, and know exactly how that would look and how a person would react?

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-09   22:50:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: FormerLurker, Boonie Rat (#23)

So, FL, I just had lunch with Boonie Rat whose sister-in-law is a registered nurse and in the Army. She did a tour in Iraq and was assigned to the trauma unit where, obviously, she's seen and tended to men who sustained similar injuries. She saw the photos of Jeff Bauman and concluded that with those critical injuries, he would have bled out within two minutes (unless the legs were cauterized from the heat of the explosion which I believe that even you'll agree that that is highly improbable). Further, in her opinion, if he didn't bleed out on the ground, he would have certainly bled out when they sat him up in the wheelchair . So do with that information what you will.

and, yes, I did call the NH Costco and verify that Jeff Bauman is an employee there.

christine  posted on  2013-05-10   17:31:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#72. To: christine (#57)

yes, I did call the NH Costco and verify that Jeff Bauman is an employee there

So what are you implying then, that he is some secret agent sort of guy who infiltrated Costco pretending he had legs but didn't, and that his entire family are "fake people"?

And I guess the doctors and nurses who attended to his injuries are fake people too, as well as the EMTs who brought him in?

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   15:35:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#73. To: FormerLurker (#72) (Edited)

pretty much .

Oh and RickyJ thinks it is fake too so don't forget to pounce on him again judas.

titorite  posted on  2013-05-17   15:43:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: titorite (#73) (Edited)

I think the Texas tornadoes were fake, and the people who faked being killed were actors.

In fact I think YOU are an actor, a fake person who pretends he's somebody he's not.

Perhaps I'm being a bit facetious with the former comment, but I'm dead serious about the latter.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   15:44:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: FormerLurker (#74)

I think the Texas tornadoes were fake, and the people who faked being killed were actors.

You are entitled to the ability to come to your own conclusions.

I also think you are not spending enough time with your notes.

titorite  posted on  2013-05-17   15:47:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#76. To: titorite (#75)

So why do you follow Dear Leader Fetzer as if he were Jesus himself? Why is it you regurgitate everything he spews forth?

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   15:49:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: FormerLurker, (#76) (Edited)

I don't rely on Fetzer. I am barely familiar with any of his work. Judy Woods I know alot better.

Also Web fariy.

I had the privilege of corresponding with her on occasion.

Why are you spewing random insults hoping to get a rise?

It comes off as slightly desperate.

titorite  posted on  2013-05-17   15:52:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#78. To: titorite (#77)

And they all work for the same team, and that team is not one who is looking for any sort of truth, far from it.

You are a shining example of what THAT team is all about.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   15:54:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#79. To: FormerLurker (#78) (Edited)

You are a shining example of what THAT team is all about.

Why thank you. That is the first polite thing you have said to me in months. Very kind of you.

titorite  posted on  2013-05-17   15:55:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#80. To: titorite (#79)

Why thank you.

Yeah, I guess your comrades must be patting you on the back for all your hard work here...

Saboteurs Attacking The 9/11 Truth Movement: The No-WTC-Planes/Video-Fakery/Energy-Beams Disinformation Gang

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   16:08:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: FormerLurker (#80) (Edited)

That is the second time you have invoked that website and I would advise any programmer minded to give it a click and see where the whois lands.

besides.

letsrollforums.com

much better than your work related government cointel site.

titorite  posted on  2013-05-17   16:11:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#82. To: titorite (#81)

All anyone needs to do is use Google to look for these key phrases...

"Fetzer disinfo" "Fetzer COINTELPRO" "Judy Wood disinfo"

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   16:32:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#83. To: FormerLurker (#82) (Edited)

You forgot Killtown disinfo, webfariy dis info and um who else.....

GENGIS!

(my fav from down under)

oh yeah, dis info.

September clues disinfo

LOL!!!

titorite  posted on  2013-05-17   16:35:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: titorite (#83)

It's quite obvious that you and your fellow clownes are either trolling these forums for kicks, or you are doing it in order to obscure any inconvenient truths which need to be "neutralized".

With your behavior on the 9/11 threads it is painfully obvious that logic, facts, and reason are your mortal enemies, and you do your best to put on a grand performance filled with lies, tap dancing, accusations, and more lies.

So it MY book, ANYONE who behaves like that is a shill whose purpose it is to instill discord, suspicion, doubt, and generally make a mess of things.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   16:39:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#85. To: FormerLurker (#84) (Edited)

Thank you for just being upfront about your military industrial government employment.

We appreciate the hard *SMirk* (I c an't write this with a strait face) work at cyber command!

FOr real though I hope the ac in your building dies and that you get a static shock everytime you touch your keyboard.

titorite  posted on  2013-05-17   16:42:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: titorite (#85) (Edited)

Go ahead and make your mindless accusations titboy, if it makes you feel better about yourself for selling out your country.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   16:46:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: FormerLurker (#86)

Go ahead and make your mindless accusations titboy, if it makes you feel better about yourself for selling out your country.

What country would that be Lurker?

The one with the drones or the one that pays assholes like you to waste the time of people like me?

titorite  posted on  2013-05-17   16:49:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#88. To: titorite (#87)

The one with the drones or the one that pays assholes like you to waste the time of people like me?

Again, you're a master of projection as noted on the 9/11 thread.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   16:50:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#89. To: FormerLurker (#88)

what country lurker?

titorite  posted on  2013-05-17   16:51:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: titorite (#89)

Screw off shillster.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-17   16:52:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#93. To: FormerLurker (#90) (Edited)

Screw off shillster.

You know, FL, this has been interesting. Both in this thread and in the "no planes thread.

They have a real problem explaining their position of 'no planes hitting the towers'. That in itself demands an explanation. Why can they not explain? Rather, why do they refuse to explain?

The 3 main proponents of this idea have all claimed at various times that it would take too much effort on their part to explain this, and that we "planers" need to exercise our own initiative and do our own research.

I have already submitted on more than one occasion that a plausible explanation on why they claim this could be done can fit in one post. Am I right? Could it be done?

I guess we'll never know. All of them have gone to great pains to not explain anything.

It has been claimed that we "planers" are ignorant, uneducated rubes, because we refuse to just take their word for anything. All they can do is distract by saying stupid shit like "we love tyranny" etc. titorite in particular attempts to play on peoples emotions by equating belief of "no planes" with a love of freedom and evidence of a higher education. It's obvious that he does it. It's in his posts.

The point of all this is WHY? They could be garden variety trolls. Or the "no planers" could be getting paid for this. "They" aren't getting their moneys worth, because their employees are such obvious morons, but it is a possibility. Perhaps they were affirmative action hires?

PSUSA2  posted on  2013-05-17   17:56:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#95. To: FormerLurker (#93)

I posted that in the wrong thread, but while the topic is not the same, the principles are the exact same. Their actions are the exact same.

PSUSA2  posted on  2013-05-17   18:02:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#139. To: PSUSA2, FormerLurker, titorite, wudidiz (#95) (Edited)

I posted that [#93] in the wrong thread, but while the topic is not the same, the principles are the exact same. Their actions are the exact same.

Are you two on a mission to turn thread after thread into a bashfest against No Planers, especially titorite and wudidiz?

Which of these statements of yours at #93 do you mean to convey, PSUSA2?:

A. The 3 main proponents of this [no planes hitting the towers] idea have all claimed at various times that [sic] we "planers" need to exercise our own initiative and do our own research.

B. It has been claimed that we "planers" are ignorant, uneducated rubes, because we refuse to just take their word for anything.

C. Both A and B

Cross-referencing 4um Title: Fake Video Stars The J Star Clones – Why Covert Operation’s Cointel Must Have ‘Fake’ Video and ‘No Planes’

Comparing more of your statements at #93 with some there [in brackets]:

#93: They have a real problem explaining their position of 'no planes hitting the towers'. That in itself demands an explanation. Why can they not explain?

[#16: Details only cloud the issue. If they [i.e. persons in a false flag discussion with you] want details, they can look them up themselves.

#213: Dont paste links. Anyone can do that. Post the proof and the source

#230: Personally I think you are nothing but a bunch of morons, too [sic] stupid to have any link to any kind of organized effort.

#290: a link they [No Planers] post must have the same true information [as what they think], so why bother reading it?]

#93: Rather, why do they refuse to explain?

I have already submitted on more than one occasion that a plausible explanation on why they claim this could be done can fit in one post. Am I right? Could it be done?

I guess we'll never know. All of them have gone to great pains to not explain anything.

So, I guess this is your diversion from my explanation to you at #343 of the thread linked above. In case you thought it was overly detailed, this is an abbreviation to clarify more succinctly:

I posted a half-hour video at #34 that you could view as an introduction about the No Planes [hitting the Towers] issue for beginners. I noted too at #35 and elsewhere here that there is tangible evidence that alleged Flt. 11 didn't fly in New York that day. ... I mentioned [at #30]: unidentifiable scraps, mismatched plane parts, suspect audio and film, and conflicting testimonies. Additonally, there is other evidence about the registration numbers of alleged 9/11 planes staying activated; as well as MSM video analysis that indicates real planes weren't used.

Also, the alleged phone calls from the alleged planes are implausible.

I think you should stand down as any judge of who's lying or not since your last statement that I quoted from #93 is false.

The remainder of your #93 posting is a contradiction of your own instruction at #114 of the linked thread above to "Leave the personal crap out of it."

Apparently, you don't have wudidiz on bozo like you said at #274 there, as evidenced by your post here at #130. So what should we think about that? Were you lying about that, just joking, changed your mind since then or what?

Edited the first word in the last section of my comments.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-05-18   6:34:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#142. To: GreyLmist (#139)

Are you two on a mission to turn thread after thread into a bashfest against No Planers, especially titorite and wudidiz?

No mission. I dont give a fuck about either one of them.

Every link posted is crap. One that titortard posted even prominently included a boxing blonde. Just state the case and THEN provide links proving the statements. It's not difficult, unless you're spreading bullshit.

It's a bashfest because a group of retards are trying to convince me up is down and left is right. And they're not doing a very good job of it, therefore the bashing.

PSUSA2  posted on  2013-05-18   7:50:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#145. To: GreyLmist, PSUSA2 (#142)

Every link posted is crap. One that titortard posted even prominently included a boxing blonde. Just state the case and THEN provide links proving the statements. It's not difficult, unless you're spreading bullshit.

When did yukon start posting here?

Bill D Berger  posted on  2013-05-18   13:40:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#146. To: Bill D Berger (#145)

Is GreyLmist some sort of Yukon, from the planet Yuk?

Death to the Yukons!

PSUSA2  posted on  2013-05-18   14:06:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#243. To: PSUSA2, Bill D Berger (#146) (Edited)

Bill D Berger at #145: "When did yukon start posting here?"

PSUSA2 at 146: "Is GreyLmist some sort of Yukon, from the planet Yuk?

Death to the Yukons!"

Am I reading this right? I'm not supposed to see that as anything smacking of an implied threat or clear and present danger for having differing opinions?...It's just you two guys funnin' around by comparing me to someone notorious who is unknown to my recollection except that they're reviled around here by LP insiders, which I'm not?

Not comical, imo, at all.

Edited for spelling.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-05-19   8:54:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#244. To: GreyLmist (#243)

It's just you two guys funnin' around

not 2. just one. me.

Dont feel threatened. You're not an alien from the Yuk star system are you??? If not, then you're safe.

PSUSA2  posted on  2013-05-19   9:03:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#245. To: PSUSA2, FormerLurker (#244)

No, I am not an alien from the Yuk star system or a Draconian either. Now that all that's cleared up, do you and FL really think that the board needs so many off-topic reminders that both of you despise No Planers? Annoying and monotonous. We surely already know that and most others here probably do too by now. I think it's safe to say that few will likely forget that anytime soon if you resisted those repetitive posting impulses some.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-05-19   11:34:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#246. To: GreyLmist (#245)

that both of you despise No Planers?

Speaking for myself, do you know what I despise?

Assertions with no proof offered to support those assertions.

I also despise those that want me to ignore what's already there; plenty of videos that show planes hitting, and trying to convince me that they are all some kind of hollywood / .gov / MSM production.

I also despise the butthurt shown by those when their assertions aren't taken seriously.

PSUSA2  posted on  2013-05-19   11:52:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#263. To: PSUSA2, FormerLurker (#246)

Speaking for myself, do you know what I despise?

Assertions with no proof offered to support those assertions.

I also despise those that want me to ignore what's already there; plenty of videos that show planes hitting, and trying to convince me that they are all some kind of hollywood / .gov / MSM production.

I also despise the butthurt shown by those when their assertions aren't taken seriously.

No Planers have offered real evidence as proofs. That you vehemently deny and reject the evidence doesn't alter that fact. Assertions with no proof offered to support them would be the 9/11 remote control storyline developed speculatively by Planers, imo.

You both seem to think that you can persist in attacking No Planers as "safe targets" to derail discussion of this thread-topic and other false flag issues that you'd rather obscure but I suspect that you're inadvertently strafing a much wider range of Boston, etc., skeptics in that process than just us.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-05-19   16:04:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#271. To: GreyLmist (#263)

No Planers have offered real evidence as proofs.

You and I have very different ideas on the meanings of evidence and proof. The only thing you folks seem to be interested in is wing tip vortices and their lack of visibility. Who has addressed all the video footage out there, other than to assert it is all fake?

Disagreeing with you, for the reasons stated, does not equal "attacking".

And any "planers" that state the planes were remote controlled, without offering proof, are just as full of crap as any "no planer". It is only a possibility. To state it as fact is wrong.

It's the same with Boston. Saying these people were actors, and everyone except the dog catcher was In On It, it idiotic. Too many internet detectives scrutinizing pics when they don't even know when the pics were taken or the order in which they were taken. But they presume to tell me that it's all fake, and they expect to not be questioned? I don't think so!

PSUSA2  posted on  2013-05-19   16:27:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#277. To: PSUSA2 (#271)

Notice that other than accusations, lies, and bullshit, these three have NOTHING at all to say in regards to the Boston Marathon bombing?

They ignore any logical question asked in a civil and polite manner, and heap on the scorn and ad hominem attacks instead.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-19   16:46:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#284. To: FormerLurker (#277)

Notice that other than accusations, lies, and bullshit, these three have NOTHING at all to say in regards to the Boston Marathon bombing?

They ignore any logical question asked in a civil and polite manner, and heap on the scorn and ad hominem attacks instead.

Yep.

About the only one here that can pretty much stick to the topic (even though he/she could do a better job) is graylmist. There is a higher degree of civility and honesty. But he/she seems to have a heavy emotional investment in this.

titortard is just an idiot that is trying to pull peoples strings. No more and no less. He has no intention of carrying on an honest discussion.

PSUSA2  posted on  2013-05-19   17:03:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#285. To: PSUSA2 (#284)

GL will post an occasional intelligent response, but usually ignores straighton questions which would logically prove that she's wrong if she were to answer honestly.

So that's not being honest.

Most of her posts as of late are more like "how dare you speak about no-planes on this other thread" when it's her and her pals which bring it up in the first place.

As far as tittard, I think it's a measured degree of stupidity and uncivility, to where it is NOT by chance or accident or out of pure retardation, it is by design.

FormerLurker  posted on  2013-05-19   17:16:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 285.

#286. To: FormerLurker (#285)

So that's not being honest.

No, but certainly more honest and definitely more civil than titortot.

Everyone has reacted that way, especially when it comes to religion. I have, everyone has. And this is a kind of religion, in that it is not based on real proof but on beliefs.

PSUSA2  posted on  2013-05-19 17:19:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#287. To: FormerLurker (#285)

GL will post an occasional intelligent response, but usually ignores straighton questions which would logically prove that she's wrong if she were to answer honestly.

So that's not being honest.

Most of her posts as of late are more like "how dare you speak about no-planes on this other thread" when it's her and her pals which bring it up in the first place.

BOOM! You just told a bunch of fucking wooping lies.

Their ya go Lurker, you are a liar.

titorite  posted on  2013-05-19 17:20:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 285.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]