Title: They hid 9/11 planes landing gear between 2 buildings Source:
CNN URL Source:[None] Published:Apr 26, 2013 Author:. Post Date:2013-04-26 17:29:58 by PSUSA2 Keywords:None Views:1820 Comments:46
Flippin thru the channels and saw this.
The "no planes it was all a holograph truthseekers" were getting a little too close to the truth for the PTBs comfort. So, "they" stashed it between 2 buildings.
You need to do some homework on that topic. I don't have time today to tutor you through all the evidence about it that's already been analyzed and discussed through the years. When you get up to speed on that subject, let me know.
I was under the impression that this was found recently, not years ago. Perhaps I was mistaken? Maybe we entered a time warp? What would George Noorey Say? George knows all.
It's good that you dont have the time to tutor me. My remaining brain cells thank you.
All we know is that this landing gear was found. They have been finding things for years because nothing was organized. But it is good to see the Internet Detective Agency is on the job. Look out, Illuminati! They're gunnin' for you.
I asked you what you were talking about because you didn't post any links. It wasn't until I saw what wudidiz posted that I found out. No identification as a 9/11 plane part was confirmed and there was no explanation of how it got there without damaging the buildings or even any damages being noticed in all this time. Maybe it wafted down with a parachute that disappeared since then? -- or perhaps you just want to insult instead of work to investigate 9/11.
While I disagree with you on the "no planes" as simply more planted false data to lead people off track, BSUSA is also planting disinformation.
Isn't it interesting how he "coincidentally" showed up to start a controversy just as everybody is beginning to twig to the Boston Bombing being another false terror operation conducted by a government?
While I disagree with you on the "no planes" as simply more planted false data to lead people off track,
Lead people off track of what? The remote control theory? Remote control can't make high speed planes fly through sea level air density without risk of operational failure. I think it's logical to presume that the perps wouldn't want to risk mechanical failure. The 9/11 propagandists and their media complex don't much care if skeptics believe that insiders Let it Happen on Purpose or Made it Happen on Purpose or used remote control as long as they believe the main "drill" that the reported casualties and alleged witnesses are all real -- and especially that the reported planes were real -- because planes and revenge are their fig leaves for wars. The remote control theory gives them another option to plead "intelligence failure mistakes" for their "perpetual wars for perpetual profits" agendas.
Isn't it interesting how he [PSUSA2] "coincidentally" showed up to start a controversy just as everybody is beginning to twig to the Boston Bombing being another false terror operation conducted by a government?
Interesting too that the Boston explosions are being described for maximal 9/11 psychological effect as "the twins", like the WTC Towers.
the "no planers" and "remote controllers" are kinda shooting themselves in the foot if they want to blame arabs for 9/11...
Neither theory blames Arabs for 9/11, afaik, but the Remote Control theory serves unintentionally or not as a "faulty intel" excuse for the claims leading to war that planes were hijacked and used as WMDs by suspect Arabs.
...but the remote control theory eliminates the need for hijackers
.
the remote control theory seems most likely to me, seeing as how dov zakheim was a PNAC signatory, was CEO of an outfit that made remote control for aircraft, is a rabbi, and is probably a dual isaeli american citizen