See other History Articles
Title: Roman Catholic Vlad Tepes: Impaled The Muslim Brotherhood, Thus Saving His Country From The Islamic Headcutters Of The Ottoman Empire.
Source:
Political Vel Craft
URL Source: http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/1 ... from-the-islam-ottoman-empire/
Published: Oct 10, 2010
Author: Volubrjtor
Post Date: 2013-05-12 01:47:31 by X-15
Keywords: None
Views: 233
Comments: 8
Vlad Dracula is credited with impaling 100,000 Ottoman Headcutters aka; Muslims and probably more. In 1462 when the invading Muslim Sultan Mehmed II reached Tirgoviste, he saw a terrifying scene, remembered in history as “the Forest of the Impaled”, there, outside the city, were 20,000 Muslim prisoners, all impaled. Sultan Mehmed II sent his envoys to speak with Vlad Tepes and when ushered into the presence of the prince, the Turks refused to remove their Phrygian caps. When questioned, they answered that it was not the custom of their fathers to remove their hats. Dracula then ordered their hats nailed to their heads with three nails so that they might never have to break such an excellent tradition. Dracula stated that when in my presence you will obey my customs. The envoys were then sent back to the sultan with their caps nailed to their skulls. Vlad (III) or Vlad Tepes, meaning “Vlad the Impaler” the Muslim Turks called him Kaziglu Bey, or “the Impaler Prince”, was the prince of Walachia, and was born in Transylvania, which at that time was ruled by Hungary.Walachia was founded in 1290 by a Transylvanian named Radu Negru, or Rudolph the Black. Dracula’s grandfather, Prince Mircea the Old, reigned from 1386 to 1418. He fought to keep Walachia independent from Islamic Turks but was forced to pay tribute to them. He and his descendants continued to rule Walachia, but under the suzerainty of the Islam Ottoman Empire (Turkey). The prince was elected by the country’s boyars, or land-owning nobles ‘We The People’. Eventually the royal House of Basarab was split into two factions — Mircea’s descendants, and the descendants of another prince named Dan (II). Dan’s descendants were called the Danesti. Mircea’s had a son named Vlad (II), born around 1390. He grew up in the court of King Sigismund of Hungary, who became the Holy Roman Emperor in 1410, and founded a secret fraternal order of knights called the Order of the Dragon to uphold Roman Catholicism and defend the Empire against the Islam Ottoman Turks. Its emblem was a dragon, wings extended, hanging on a cross. Vlad (III’s) father Vlad (II), was admitted to the Order around 1431 because of his bravery in fighting the Islam Turks. From 1431 onward, Vlad (II) wore the emblem of the order and later, as ruler of Wallachia, his coinage bore the dragon symbol. The word for dragon in Romanian is “drac” and “ul” is the definitive article. Vlad (III’s) father thus came to be known as “Vlad Dracul,” or “Vlad the dragon.” In Romania the ending “ulea” means “the son of”. Under this interpretation, Vlad (III) thus became Vlad Dracula, or “the son of the dragon.” The sobriquet thus took on a double meaning for enemies of Vlad Tepes and his father.) Sigismund made Vlad the military governor of Transylvania, a post he held from 1431 to 1435. During that time he lived in the town of Sighisoara or Schassburg. You can still visit the citadel there and even the house where Vlad’s son Dracula was born. Today there’s a restaurant on the second floor. There’s also a mural in the house that depicts Vlad Dracul or Vlad (II). Dracula was born in November of 1431. His given name was Vlad. He had an older brother, Mircea, and a younger brother, Radu the Handsome. Their mother was a Moldavian princess or a Tranyslvanian noble. It is said that she educated Dracula in his early years. Later, he was trained for knighthood by an old boyar who had fought the Islamic Turks. In 1462 when the invading Evil Muslim Sultan Mehmed II reached Tirgoviste, he saw a terrifying scene, remembered in history as “the Forest of the Impaled”, there, outside the city, were 20,000 Muslims prisoners, all impaled. The sultan’s officers were too scared to go on – Dracula had won again.He’s remembered today as a patriotic hero, who stood up to Islam (Turkey) and their expansionism. He was the last Walachian prince to remain independent from Islam’s Ottoman Empire. Remember, The Discovery Channel Is A Tool Used For Reprogramming By The NWO Who Utilize The Headcutters In Their Moves To Destabilize Nations. This Is Why They Labeled Vlad Tepes As Evil – When In Actuality, He Was The Hero Saving His Country From Evil Headcutters, Who Were Practicing Expansionism Throughout Europe. The Headcutters Of Islam Were All Johnny Come Lately s, As Europe Was Either Already Roman Catholics Or Barbarians! At the Battle of Poitiers in 732, the Frankish king Charles Martel defeated the Saracens and pushed the forces of Islam back into the Iberian Peninsula. It was not until 1492 that the Moors were finally thrown out of Europe, but in the meantime the Islamic virus was contained in Spain and Portugal, and thus kept out of the heart of Western Europe. One of Charles Martel’s comrades-in-arms at Poitiers was a warrior of the North known as Ogier le Danois, later Holger Danske, or Holger the Dane. Although Holger was a historical figure, little is known of him, and most of the written material about him is drawn from legend. According to the chroniclers, Holger had previously done battle with the Franks over their incursions into Danish territory. But in 732 the menace of the Saracens forced him to set aside his differences with Charles Martel and journey southwards to fight side-by-side with the Frankish forces against the common enemy. At the end of his days, Holger, like King Arthur, retired to a secluded keep to enter a twilight sleep from which he will awake in the hour of his country’s need. The location most frequently cited for Holger’s rest is Kronborg castle at Helsingør. It was within the first 100 Years after The False Prophet was born, Mudhead’s Islam Headcutters began deceiving and murdering his fellow man.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: X-15 (#0)
Going back to the 15th century, was Tepes a Roman Catholic or was he Byzantine Christian (Greek/Romanian/Russian Orthodox)?
At that time there was little difference between the two. The schism in the Roman Catholic Church, or Roman Church if you will, was more a matter of money, politics, and control over territory. It was also an offshoot of corruption in Rome which initially drove Byzantium to, like Henry the VIIIth, found their own separate branch. The Eastern Orthodox grew from the liturgical separation of east and west. So, as the two remained separate, arguably, Byzantium remained truer to Christianity as it was born but nevertheless added their own little quirks - such as the reverence for icons.
The biggest difference is that Orthdox Christians disagree with the idea of a "pope": they ask how can one man claim to speak for God or interpret the Bible for all Christiandom? Here you go, several days of good reading here: orthodoxinfo.com/i nquirers/papal_supremacy.aspx : "Let us note, also, that the honor which the Orthodox Church has bestowed on both St. Peter and St. Paul, that is, the title of Protokoryphaioi, i.e., "leaders" or "chiefs" of the Apostles, gives us some insight into what the distinctions between the Disciples of Christ actually mean. They describe functions, responsibilities, cares, and rôles; they do not, however, refer to special privileges, prerogatives, or authority. For, in the final analysis, despite these distinctions, all of the Apostles were equal, just as all of the Bishops of the Orthodox Church—who are their successors—, whether they be simple Bishops or Patriarchs or Œcumenical Patriarchs, are absolute equals. This fact helps to explain both the passage which you cite from II Corinthians and the Gospel passages which Papists have wholly unjustifiably used to support the doctrine of Papal supremacy." :)
#2. To: Shoonra, X-15 (#1)
#3. To: Original_Intent (#2)
-Alex Kurtagic
#4. To: Original_Intent (#2)
All in all, mohammed should have been short-termed.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#5. To: X-15 (#3)
Amen. For, in the final analysis, despite these distinctions, all of the Apostles were equal, just as all of the Bishops of the Orthodox Church—who are their successors—, whether they be simple Bishops or Patriarchs or Œcumenical Patriarchs, are absolute equals.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#6. To: Lod (#4)
Basically what I took away from history, in college, was that Mohammed was a desert bandit leader seeking power, and founding a "new" religion simply was a matter of looking for a way to grant his power seeking legitimacy. I know that is likely to upset those who follow Islam but if one looks honestly at its history that is basically what it boils down to. Not that I am any kinder toward modern Christianity which bears only a shattered resemblance to Christianity before the Council of Nicea in 325 AD.
#7. To: Original_Intent (#6)
Bare-bones, Amen. That's my take also. Basically what I took away from history, in college, was that Mohammed was a desert bandit leader seeking power, and founding a "new" religion simply was a matter of looking for a way to grant his power seeking legitimacy. I know that is likely to upset those who follow Islam but if one looks honestly at its history that is basically what it boils down to. Not that I am any kinder toward modern Christianity which bears only a shattered resemblance to Christianity before the Council of Nicea in 325 AD.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
#8. To: Original_Intent (#2)
A bunch of queers prancing around in dresses. Roman Catholic Church
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest