See other War, War, War Articles
Title: Woolrich London Killing: Terrorism or False Flag?
Source:
by author
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 24, 2013
Author: Stephen Lendman
Post Date: 2013-05-24 03:09:28 by Stephen Lendman
Keywords: None
Views: 2430
Comments: 68
Woolrich London Killing: Terrorism or False Flag? by Stephen Lendman Reports said two assailants hacked a British soldier to death. He's been identified as Lee Rigby. He was killed in broad daylight. It was several hundred meters from southeast London's Woolwich Royal Artillery barracks. Weapons included a machete type knife. Alleged attackers remained on the scene. They did so until police arrived 20 minutes later. Why wasn't explained. Killers don't usually stay around to be captured. Both assailants were shot and apprehended. They were hospitalized for treatment. One allegedly said "(w)e must fight as they fight us. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." Britain's ITV news aired an edited video clip. Allegedly an onlooker filmed it. How whoever did so happened to be on site wasn't explained. Odds against it are huge. So is remaining unscathed. Assailants don't take kindly to being caught in the act. The clip showed a young Black man with blood dripping from his hands saying "(w)e swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you." "The only reason reason we have done this is because Muslims are dying every day." "The British soldier is an eye for eye, a tooth for a tooth." ITV edited the statement. It said nothing about "do(ing) this because Muslims are dying every day." Unedited it said: "There are many, many ayah (religious verses) throughout the Koran that says we must fight them as they fight us, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." "I apologize that women had to witness this today but in our land women have to see the same." "You people will never be safe. Remove your government. They don't care about you." "You think David Cameron will get stuck in the street, when we start busting our guns?" "You think your politicians are gonna die? not it's gonna be the average like you, and your children." "So get rid of them. Tell them to bring our troops back, so you can all live in peace." Reports called what happened the first domestic Al Qaeda-inspired attack since the July 7, 2005 underground (so-called 7/7) bombings. A series of attacks targeted the city's public transport system. They came during the morning rush hour. They were for maximum disruption and casualties. At precisely the same time, an anti-terror drill occurred. It simulated real attacks. It was no coincidence. The real attack was a false flag. It was done to heighten fear. At issue was enlisting public sentiment to keep Britain allied with Washington's imperial wars. At the time, AP reported that Israel's London embassy warned Scotland Yard in advance. Israeli Army Radio said: "Scotland Yard had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred." No action was taken. Israel's then finance minister Netanyahu was told to skip a London economic conference. He was scheduled to speak. Other officials were warned, not the public. Fifty-two people died. Over 700 were injured. These type incidents automatically raise questions. Answers are needed before jumping to conclusions. The timing of Wednesday's killing is very suspicious. It comes when Washington, Britain, other NATO allies, and Israel head toward full-scale war on Syria. Secretary of State John Kerry's traveling through the Middle East. A so-called June peace conference is scheduled. It's subterfuge. Prior peace initiatives failed. So will this one. Demanding Assad must go assures it. Washington's proxy war was launched to do so. Expect no change of plans now. Kerry met with foreign ministers of 11 so-called Friends of Syria countries and opposition group representatives. He discussed Syria with Netanyahu in Jerusalem. Multiple Israeli provocations preceded his visit. On May 23, Haaretz said Israel's "maintaining intense intelligence activity in Syria and working with local villagers." It's considering a covert Syrian "proxy force." It claims doing so will protect Israeli security. Israel's armed forces are very able on their own. A so-called proxy force, if established, is clearly provocative. It heads things closer to full-scale intervention. Washington and Israel partner in all regional belligerence. They jointly plan and implement conflicts. Kerry's trip coincides with Washington's plan to ramp up support for so-called "rebels." He demands Assad must go. He's uncompromising. So is Obama. Full-scale conflict could erupt any time. Manufactured pretexts make it easier. False flags are longstanding pre-war tactics. They're US/Israeli specialties. Britain's an active co-conspirator. Muslim extremism was blamed for Wednesday's London killing. We've seen this all before. Expect heightened Islamophobia ahead. UK, US, other key NATO allies, and Israel benefit most. They'll take full advantage. British MP George Galloway said "(t)his sickening atrocity in London is exactly what we are paying the same kind of people to do in Syria." True enough. He omitted explaining what appears most important. Washington and complicit allies manufacture pretexts. They did so to justify proxy war on Syria. It's a short step to intervening full-blown. They've done it before. They manipulate public sentiment. They fabricated reasons to attack Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. They're doing so against Iran. They want public support. Stoking anti-Muslim rage enlists it. Post-9/11, Bush's Afghan war was popular. Few knew what's now more apparent. Fewer understood Washington's imperial agenda. Multiple wars followed. New ones are planned. The entire region and beyond may become embroiled in conflict. Advancing America's imperium matters most. At issue is creating pretexts to do so. Perhaps London's incident is the latest. The fullness of time will explain more. Prime Minister David Cameron convened an emergency meeting. Top advisors and intelligence officials attended. UK Home Secretary, Theresa May, called an emergency Civil Contingencies Committee (COBRA) meeting. Cameron chaired it. It includes cabinet ministers and high-level security officials. It deals with terrorism and other major crises. COBRA refers to the room where committee members meet - Cabinet Office Briefing Room A. A terrorist alert was imposed. Heightened security steps were taken. These measures don't commonly follow street killings. It doesn't matter how gruesome. Most incidents get scant coverage. Many go unnoticed. This one suggests something bigger. What happened may be pretext for what's planned. It remains to be seen what follows. Peter Eyre is a Middle East consultant, geopolitical analyst, investigative journalist, anti-war activist, and valued Progressive Radio News Hour guest. He jumped on the Woolrich incident. He discussed justifiable reasons to doubt the legitimacy of official reports. They have a distinct aroma. They fall short of truth and full disclosure. On May 23, Eyre headlined "Woolwich beheading: Security tightened at all London army barracks." His detailed analysis includes images. "The gruesome scene of a decapitated actor with no police or paramedics at the scene and no blood," he said. The "offenders are shot by armed police who are in attendance in the background but the murder scene has not been secured!!" Many awakened "to this amazing Shakespearean play that has unfolded in Woolwich, London where all the actors were so bad they would not even qualify for an interview as an extra in some third rate movie!!" Eyre asked if police "drag(ged) the (victim's) body around the corner?" "BBC stated a man wearing a Help the Hero's T Shirt was hit by a car, then attacked and killed with a machete or sword by the cars occupants." (S)o much vivid violence and yet still no blood at the scene…why?" "(B)ecause the actors had not had time to splash it around before they filmed the scene." "(I)t was however added later as the picture (in his article) shows…the blood is only on the pavement and not on the road!!" "(D)o you think they attempted to copy the Boston Bombing but somehow did not get it right?" Eyre suggested that blood on a signpost was "Tomato Ketchup!!" Key is calling the incident Islamic terrorism. Doing so automatically raises suspicions. Most often, the usual suspects are patsies. They're props for planned state-sponsored mischief. Expect UK, America, Israel and imperial allies to take full advantage. Police state harshness may increase. Waging war on Islam will continue. Doing so full-scale against Syria appears likely. What's long planned may erupt any time. A Final Comment UK media reports identified one alleged attacker. Twenty-eight year old Michael Abebolajo grew up in Romford. He comes from a Christian family. In 2003, he converted to Islam. A man who knew his family said they were very pleasant. Friends called him very quiet. In school, he was a good guy, they said. They were shocked to learn a former schoolmate faces murder charges. Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book is titled "Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity." http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour http://www.dailycensored.com/woolrich-london-killing-terrorism-or-false-flag/
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 46.
#1. To: Stephen Lendman (#0)
False flag Steve. Everyone here that is sane agrees.
Insanity is thinking everything is a false flag/conspiracy. Someday perhaps there will be a cure for this kind of dementia.
Someday perhaps there will be a cure for this kind of dementia. No cure for people wanting to be "special" and privy to "super double top- secret knowledge" that elevates them to internet demi-god status. They can't quit hitting that pipe long enough to see how funny they sound when they try to blow this street crime up into a *False Flag Event!!*. Sometimes niggers gonna be niggers and the irrationality of their Islamic-fueled pea-brain leads to the death of a White Man, again. I've yet to hear one good reason why this crime is a *False Flag Event!!*, just the blatherings of internet commandos who want to be thought of as being "special" in the eyes of us mere mortals.
The false flag advertisers in this British matter are risking the alienation of people who would otherwise be open to all forms of future government collusion.
That'd be true if it wasn't a false flag, but it was. Obviously. It's actually the common consensus amongst every aware individual or group I've come across online and off except for the few usual official story devotees that get their "facts" from the msm and public school system. Questions about the woolwich attack that need to be answered!
They did run him over first.
They did run him over first. Correct. But they didn't "just run him over". They crashed their car before attacking the guy. They could have "just run him over". Instead of crashing their car.
They crashed their car before attacking the guy. They could have "just run him over". Instead of crashing their car. No alleged witness has claimed to have seen the car crash or even seeing how it got on the sidewalk or before then, afaik. This is not super double top-secret knowledge. It is a simple fact that is anomalous, yet ignored by belligerents who refuse to question the official version of this. Also anomalous is that the only film footage of the area at the time has been from alleged witnesses but this 5.5 minute video shows a swiveling street camera in that location at 4:58. Link is set to start at that timestamp: In Woolwich No One Is Saying Anything - Morris Edited for spelling.
#47. To: GreyLmist (#46)
Good. Though I guess the PL internet is better than no internet...
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#25. To: titorite (#1)
Everyone here that is sane agrees.
#29. To: Turtle (#25)
Insanity is thinking everything is a false flag/conspiracy.
#30. To: X-15 (#29)
#31. To: Jethro Tull, GreyLmist, titorite, christine, *Black Ops - Psyops* (#30)
1. Why did the 'killers' crash their car before attacking the guy? were they on drink or drugs? why not just run him over?
2. How did the 'killers' know the guy was a soldier? simply based on the tee shirt he was supposedly wearing?
3. How did they know where he would be walking at that very time? Surely they must have known his movements prior to that moment?
4. If the 'killers' had firearms as well as machetes and knives, why not just shoot him?
5. Since no picture or video shows a beheaded body, and the post mortem says he was basically 'incised to death', then how do we know he was beheaded?
6. Why werent the numerous passers by even remotely scared of these bloodied maniacs that just murdered someone, as they casually strolled by? How did they know they wouldn't be in any danger?
7. The so called 'good samaritans', the women who were said to have 'protected' the beheaded body to prevent it from further attack, including the woman who supposedly got off a bus, just to talk to the bloodied 'killer', telling him that terrorism would never prevail, etc, or another woman who lay down beside the headless bloodless 'corpse', are we supposed to actually believe that?
8. Why did it take the police almost 20 minutes to arrive on scene?
9. Why do some pics appear to show 'police' cutting the 'killers' clothing and adding blood?
10. Why does the forensics tent, supposedly covering the 'headless corpse', show up in 2 different locations, one near the junction of the 2 roads, the other, much further away?
11. If the incident happened around 2.30 pm, why did it only filter through to mainstream media several hours later? (And incessantly ever since)?
12. Why did the PM have to cut his trip to france short, for a murder?
13. Why was the scary sounding COBRA commitee formed? for one murder?
14. Since when is a stabbing, an 'act of terrorism'?
15. Why does one of the 'perps', the one ranting to the camera, have no blood on him whatsoever, except the very odd looking stuff on his hands (depending on which video version of the edited mainstream media you watch)?
16. Why does that very shot show the perp in slightly different positions, as if being filmed by two cameras?
17. Who is the very brave cameraman? why did he stand there a few feet from someone who had just 'cut the head off a passer by'? Why not run off? Or get a shot of the 'victim'?
18. Why is it these 2 'perps' were known to MI5, as always?? Were they trained by MI5? Are they agents, or actors?
19. Where is all the local CCTV? Why is there only the one video, of the very brave passer by, holding 2 cameras, filming the alledged perp, who doesn't even admit to the 'killing', merely hes sorry that 'women had to see this'?
20. Why are some aerial shots altered? Why are some parts, of passers by walking straight past the 'perp', 'cut out'?
21. If armed 'police' , who arrived almost 20 minutes later, shot the 'perps' 8 times, surely, they would have killed them?
22. Why did the 'perps' hang around, waiting for armed police, who would surely kill them? If they were heavily armed martyrs, why not kill themselves?
23. Why do the media bombard us with 'eyewitnesses saw this, unnamed sources saw that', yet all the raw footage is watermarked with a mainstream news outlets symbol? Who are these sources and eyewitnesses? Do they have a direct line to the news anchors?
24. Why is this incident still making headlines, when school bus crashes in pakistan, earthquakes, floods and other mass murders, barely get a few lines in the mainstream media?
25. If much larger PSy ops like 9/11, 7/7 and sandy hook can be staged, surely, this one should be a stroll? Only the newsreaders are telling us what happened, and they werent there! The 'victim' was a soldier, whats to say he hadn't died in combat, several months prior, and the 'powers that be' used this to their advantage? they wouldn't, would they?advantage? they wouldn't, would they?
~ Jeremy Haydon
#34. To: wudidiz (#31)
#36. To: Lod (#34)
Questions about the woolwich attack that need to be answered!
1. Why did the 'killers' crash their car before attacking the guy? were they on drink or drugs? why not just run him over?
#41. To: wudidiz, All (#36)
(Edited)
But they didn't "just run him over".
#42. To: All (#41)
#46. To: All (#42)
Replies to Comment # 46.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 46.
