See other World News Articles
Title: BUTCHERED SOLDIER Terror Attack in LONDON a HOAX? DEBUNKED & PROVEN AS GENUINE EVENT
Source:
YouTube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRYA7ZuqvcU
Published: May 23, 2013
Author: Luxetti
Post Date: 2013-05-26 14:50:53 by FormerLurker
Keywords: None
Views: 11365
Comments: 314
Published on May 23, 2013 BUTCHERED SOLDIER Terror Attack in LONDON a HOAX? DEBUNKED & PROVEN AS GENUINE EVENT Was the Woolwich Attack a Hoax? (Debunked) Where is the blood? People are questioning whether the attack on a soldier in Woolwich yesterday was a fabricated event. The first guy goes for her with a machete... she took him out like Robocop...': Rapper's tweets among eyewitness accounts of horrific attack WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT Onlookers recount murder in shocking detail from start to gruesome finish Boya Dee tweets: 'Two black brothers run over this white guy over and start chopping man's head off' Another witness said the two attackers behaved like 'crazed animals' 'They dragged him from the pavement and dumped body in middle of road' Heroic woman begged with terrorists to comfort and pray for dead soldier Suspects then 'went for police with machetes, a knife and handgun' Witness: 'I don't think they cared. Police were only ones who did shooting' Pupils cower in terror as jihadist killer totes gun near their school A rapper who witnessed the shocking Woolwich attack revealed the true horror of the situation as he posted a series of tweets from the scene. Boya Dee was among a number of eyewitnesses who saw the incident yesterday from start to finish, and described how the suspects tried to attack police officers after hacking at a man with a machete. He wrote: 'The two black bredas [brothers] run this white guy over then hop out the car and start chopping mans head off with machete!!' In another dramatic tweet, he added: 'The first guy goes for the female fed [police officer] with the machete and she not even ramping [messing about] she took man out like robocop never seen nutn [nothing] like it.' It was confirmed by police last night that two men had been arrested and officers from the counter-terrorist unit were leading the investigation into the killing. Another eyewitness revealed how he watched the two attackers behave like 'crazed animals'. The man, known only as James, said he and his partner saw two black men attack a young man aged around 20 in a Help for Heroes T-shirt in Woolwich, south-east London, like he was 'a piece of meat'. Fighting back tears, he told LBC Radio: 'They were hacking at this poor guy, literally. They were chopping him, cutting him. These two guys were crazed. They were just animals. 'They dragged him from the pavement, dumped his body in the middle of the road and left (it) there.' He said that after the 'horrendous' attack, the two men, in their 20s, stood around, waving knives and a gun, even asking people nearby to take pictures of them 'as if they wanted to be on TV'. 'They were oblivious to anything, they were more worried about having their photo taken, running up and down the road,' he said. 'They had no intention of running off or leaving or anything. 'In my opinion, they were waiting for the police to arrive to be shot by the police. That's the only thing I can think. It's horrendous what they were doing to that guy.' I wasn't scared. Better me than a child': Incredible courage of the woman Cub Scout leader who confronted knife-wielding Islamic fanatic moments after he had slaughtered soldier in London street Poster Comment: Food for thought
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 138.
#3. To: FormerLurker (#0)
I watched 8 minutes of this. I predict that this will be ignored by certain people here. You can also see, in the opening frame on the right side, the sign to the left of the nogs head has different coloration from the sign on the left section of the frame,
It was amazing how fast certain people jumped on "it was all actors, fake blood, CGI, etc." bandwagon concerning this particular event.
As far as I'm concerned, the belief that "everything is a false flag, everything is a conspiracy, everything, everything, everything" is a mental illness, and should be listed as such.
Unfortunately for you, there's no cure for dumb.
Are you paid to be stupid or are you just normally mentally ill?
Click on top two pics to magnify What happened to the body/object in the road and in front of the truck in the first pic? -- not seen in the 2nd pic but the truck is shown in that one where the body/object had been.
What happened to the body/object in the road and in front of the truck in the first pic? -- not seen in the 2nd pic but the truck is shown in that one where the body/object had been. It's a body and there's a lady in front of it in the second picture I think.
You're probably right about that.
No flame intended here GL, but can you help me with the logistics of this crime. Since you, and others, have put forward the proposition that this incident was staged, can you help me with the basic questions one would ask during an investigation; who was involved, what is in the road (a body or something else), where and how did the staging occur, when was the red tint applied, what is the motive and lastly, IYO, app. how many people were involved in this acting effort, both directly, and indirectly, as in the interviewer w/camera & surrounding onlookers.
Irrelevant!!! The dead soldier, Lee Rigby, is on a deserted island along with the Flight 93 passengers and Elvis Presley, Jim Morrison, et al. Or something like that..... You're just a mean sceptic of the *False Flag Event!* :)
X-15: Irrelevant!!! After so many years of searching for the Truth about what has been destroying our nation and government, others and most of our world too; after watching false flag agendas of ruination continue time after time on that destructive course undeterred as if they are the Truth, despite all evidence demonstrating that they are deceptions, and people more concerned with demeaning investigators; after so long of about nothing changing for the better in the hopes that it will if people just realize that what they've been told from the media and other such controllers in the upper echelons is nightmarish lies; perhaps we have reached the point where the bigger question is not what's happened but how much does it matter if it's real or not to those who want to believe the official versions.
That's the root of the problem for you and others of like mind. There's the official version, and there's your version. You make no allowances for other versions because you just know you're right. You can't prove it but you know it. And if your version isn't believed, then that automatically means they accept the official version of events. But this doesn't apply to you nearly as much as it does to some others here.
PSUSA2: That's the root of the problem for you and others of like mind. There's the official version, and there's your version. You make no allowances for other versions because you just know you're right. You can't prove it but you know it. And if your version isn't believed, then that automatically means they accept the official version of events. But this doesn't apply to you nearly as much as it does to some others here. No, how much it matters if the official version is real or not is a problem only for you and likeminded others who insist that's all there is to consider as valid, right or wrong -- not people who haven't refused to ask whether it's real or not. Evidently, it doesn't matter much, if at all, to those like you who have been told a story with little else but some dubious film trusted as corroborative and some authoritative-sounding reports. However, there are valid issues with Lee Rigby's whereabouts for some time before the alleged attack, as I posted at #57 above, and so there is a possiblity (slight though it may be) that he could even have left the country prior. In addition to the CGI video debate, there has also been obvious photographic evidence from the onset that calls the official version into question as to how many suspects were allegedly involved at the perp scene and all attempts by me to get any open examination here at all of that conflicting evidence have been declined by those who are only concerned, or mostly so, with making researchers the priority to critically assess because of their non-compliance with officialdom's rendition. Reference photos A, B and C listed at Post #13 of another thread. Edited for spacing and 2nd-link correction.
No, there's not. Lee Rigby at 00:20 seconds in the blue shirt/jersey.
Forgot to ping you to #107. That video is from two days before the alleged attack, iirc.
Proof that Lee Rigby was 'spirited out of the country'?? None, and NOBODY else even remotely thinks that this was some kind of *False Flag Event!!*. That's just wishful conjecture on you and some other deluded individuals part.
I didn't claim to have proof that he left the country. The evidence concerning his whereabouts indicates that as a possibility, even if it's only a slight possibility. It's not about wishful conjecture on my part or other questioners. It could be said that it's conjecture on your part that the possibility can't reasonably exist without the agreement of official storytellers and believers. Edited line 3.
Well, that just leaves the door open on every event in human history: John Wilkes Booth didn't assassinate Abraham Lincoln: *False Flag Event!!*, the Wright Brothers didn't fly first: *False Flag Event!!", Al Capone was just a persecuted Italian-American who was set up by J. Edgar Hoover: "False Flag Event!!*, The Alamo never happened, the Masonic Texans made a secret treaty with Mexico that was brokered by jewy Rothschild emissaries: "False Flag Event!! *, blah blah blah.
There are many things widely accepted as "official" history that I think should be reinvestigated as probable false flags/PsyOps/BlackOps or for deliberate falsification of the narratives. Many "official" renditions about the "Civil War" era here are especially a bunch of hokum, in my opinion. The frequency/infrequency of past false flags or the fact that there are immigration/racial/religious problems that abound in the UK and elsewhere is all beside the point that the video you posted yourself at #110 above conflicts with the official version of only 2 prone people at the perp scene. See at 0:55 of the repost below that (except for an odd, oval-shaped censoring of a third body on the ground there where the group of people are standing) shows one of the very same scenes (Photo C at #13 of another thread) that I have tried several times to get reviewed as an anomaly that indicates something deceptive about the official version. Compare 0:55 there to: Edited for grammar and timestamp addition below the video for photo comparison.
You are a goddamned idiot and you're fucking nuts with your false fag bullshit. Bozo'd.......
X-15: You are a goddamned idiot and you're fucking nuts with your false fag bullshit. Bozo'd....... I have never seen so much wide ranging aversion and now this level of reactiveness over a simple evidence photo presentation in all of my time here. Just sayin'.
There are no replies to Comment # 138. End Trace Mode for Comment # 138.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#4. To: PSUSA2 (#3)
#11. To: FormerLurker, PSUSA (#4)
#13. To: Turtle (#11)
mental illness
#44. To: wudidiz (#13)
#47. To: Turtle, space-wasters, !graphic - gory - gross! (#44)
#65. To: wudidiz, All (#47)
#67. To: GreyLmist (#65)
Click on top two pics to magnify
#68. To: wudidiz (#67)
there's a lady in front of it in the second picture I think
#69. To: GreyLmist, 4um stagers (#68)
#70. To: Jethro Tull (#69)
No flame intended here GL, but can you help me with the logistics of this crime. Since you, and others, have put forward the proposition that this incident was staged, can you help me with the basic questions one would ask during an investigation; who was involved, what is in the road (a body or something else), where and how did the staging occur, when was the red tint applied, what is the motive and lastly, IYO, app. how many people were involved in this acting effort, both directly, and indirectly, as in the interviewer w/camera & surrounding onlookers.
#72. To: X-15, Jethro Tull (#70)
Jethro Tull: No flame intended here GL, but can you help me with the logistics of this crime. Since you, and others, have put forward the proposition that this incident was staged, can you help me with the basic questions one would ask during an investigation; who was involved, what is in the road (a body or something else), where and how did the staging occur, when was the red tint applied, what is the motive and lastly, IYO, app. how many people were involved in this acting effort, both directly, and indirectly, as in the interviewer w/camera & surrounding onlookers.
#87. To: GreyLmist (#72)
perhaps we have reached the point where the bigger question is not what's happened but how much does it matter if it's real or not to those who want to believe the official versions.
#99. To: PSUSA2, Jethro Tull, X-15 (#87)
(Edited)
Me: perhaps we have reached the point where the bigger question is not what's happened but how much does it matter if it's real or not to those who want to believe the official versions.
#106. To: GreyLmist (#99)
there is a possiblity (slight though it may be) that he could even have left the country prior.
#108. To: X-15 (#106)
#114. To: GreyLmist (#108)
#125. To: X-15 (#114)
(Edited)
Proof that Lee Rigby was 'spirited out of the country'?? None, and NOBODY else even remotely thinks that this was some kind of *False Flag Event!!*. That's just wishful conjecture on you and some other deluded individuals part.
#128. To: GreyLmist (#125)
It could be said that it's conjecture on your part that the possibility can't reasonably exist without the agreement of official storytellers and believers.
#131. To: X-15 (#128)
(Edited)
#134. To: GreyLmist (#131)
#138. To: X-15 (#134)
Me at #131: "the video you posted yourself at #110 above conflicts with the official version of only 2 prone people at the perp scene. See at 0:55 [...] that (except for an odd, oval-shaped censoring of a third body on the ground there where the group of people are standing) [it] shows one of the very same scenes (Photo C at #13 of another thread) that I have tried several times to get reviewed as an anomaly that indicates something deceptive about the official version."
Replies to Comment # 138.
