4um: BUTCHERED SOLDIER Terror Attack in LONDON a HOAX? DEBUNKED & PROVEN AS GENUINE EVENT

Title: BUTCHERED SOLDIER Terror Attack in LONDON a HOAX? DEBUNKED & PROVEN AS GENUINE EVENT
Source: YouTube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRYA7ZuqvcU
Published: May 23, 2013
Author: Luxetti
Post Date: 2013-05-26 14:50:53 by FormerLurker
Keywords: None
Views: 11772
Comments: 314

BUTCHERED SOLDIER Terror Attack in LONDON a HOAX? DEBUNKED & PROVEN AS GENUINE EVENT

Was the Woolwich Attack a Hoax? (Debunked) Where is the blood? People are questioning whether the attack on a soldier in Woolwich yesterday was a fabricated event.

The first guy goes for her with a machete... she took him out like Robocop...': Rapper's tweets among eyewitness accounts of horrific attack WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT Onlookers recount murder in shocking detail from start to gruesome finish Boya Dee tweets: 'Two black brothers run over this white guy over and start chopping man's head off' Another witness said the two attackers behaved like 'crazed animals' 'They dragged him from the pavement and dumped body in middle of road' Heroic woman begged with terrorists to comfort and pray for dead soldier Suspects then 'went for police with machetes, a knife and handgun' Witness: 'I don't think they cared. Police were only ones who did shooting' Pupils cower in terror as jihadist killer totes gun near their school

A rapper who witnessed the shocking Woolwich attack revealed the true horror of the situation as he posted a series of tweets from the scene.

Boya Dee was among a number of eyewitnesses who saw the incident yesterday from start to finish, and described how the suspects tried to attack police officers after hacking at a man with a machete.

He wrote: 'The two black bredas [brothers] run this white guy over then hop out the car and start chopping mans head off with machete!!'

In another dramatic tweet, he added: 'The first guy goes for the female fed [police officer] with the machete and she not even ramping [messing about] she took man out like robocop never seen nutn [nothing] like it.'

It was confirmed by police last night that two men had been arrested and officers from the counter-terrorist unit were leading the investigation into the killing.

Another eyewitness revealed how he watched the two attackers behave like 'crazed animals'.

The man, known only as James, said he and his partner saw two black men attack a young man aged around 20 in a Help for Heroes T-shirt in Woolwich, south-east London, like he was 'a piece of meat'.

Fighting back tears, he told LBC Radio: 'They were hacking at this poor guy, literally. They were chopping him, cutting him. These two guys were crazed. They were just animals.

'They dragged him from the pavement, dumped his body in the middle of the road and left (it) there.'

He said that after the 'horrendous' attack, the two men, in their 20s, stood around, waving knives and a gun, even asking people nearby to take pictures of them 'as if they wanted to be on TV'.

'They were oblivious to anything, they were more worried about having their photo taken, running up and down the road,' he said. 'They had no intention of running off or leaving or anything.

'In my opinion, they were waiting for the police to arrive to be shot by the police. That's the only thing I can think. It's horrendous what they were doing to that guy.'

I wasn't scared. Better me than a child': Incredible courage of the woman Cub Scout leader who confronted knife-wielding Islamic fanatic moments after he had slaughtered soldier in London street

You are a goddamned idiot and you're fucking nuts with your false fag bullshit. Bozo'd.......

Questions about the woolwich attack that need to be answered!
1. Why did the 'killers' crash their car before attacking the guy? were they on drink or drugs? why not just run him over?
2.
How did the 'killers' know the guy was a soldier? simply based on the tee shirt he was supposedly wearing?
3. How did they know where he would be walking at that very time? Surely they must have known his movements prior to that moment?
4.
If the 'killers' had firearms as well as machetes and knives, why not just shoot him?
5. Since no picture or video shows a beheaded body, and the post mortem says he was basically 'incised to death', then how do we know he was beheaded?
6. Why werent the numerous passers by even remotely scared of these bloodied maniacs that just murdered someone, as they casually strolled by? How did they know they wouldn't be in any danger?
7. The so called 'good samaritans', the women who were said to have 'protected' the beheaded body to prevent it from further attack, including the woman who supposedly got off a bus, just to talk to the bloodied 'killer', telling him that terrorism would never prevail, etc, or another woman who lay down beside the headless bloodless 'corpse', are we supposed to actually believe that?
8. Why did it take the police almost 20 minutes to arrive on scene?
9. Why do some pics appear to show 'police' cutting the 'killers' clothing and adding blood?
10. Why does the forensics tent, supposedly covering the 'headless corpse', show up in 2 different locations, one near the junction of the 2 roads, the other, much further away?
11. If the incident happened around 2.30 pm, why did it only filter through to mainstream media several hours later? (And incessantly ever since)?
12. Why did the PM have to cut his trip to france short, for a murder?
13. Why was the scary sounding COBRA commitee formed? for one murder?
14. Since when is a stabbing, an 'act of terrorism'?
15. Why does one of the 'perps', the one ranting to the camera, have no blood on him whatsoever, except the very odd looking stuff on his hands (depending on which video version of the edited mainstream media you watch)?
16. Why does that very shot show the perp in slightly different positions, as if being filmed by two cameras?
17. Who is the very brave cameraman? why did he stand there a few feet from someone who had just 'cut the head off a passer by'? Why not run off? Or get a shot of the 'victim'?
18. Why is it these 2 'perps' were known to MI5, as always?? Were they trained by MI5? Are they agents, or actors?
19. Where is all the local CCTV? Why is there only the one video, of the very brave passer by, holding 2 cameras, filming the alledged perp, who doesn't even admit to the 'killing', merely hes sorry that 'women had to see this'?
20. Why are some aerial shots altered? Why are some parts, of passers by walking straight past the 'perp', 'cut out'?
21. If armed 'police' , who arrived almost 20 minutes later, shot the 'perps' 8 times, surely, they would have killed them?
22. Why did the 'perps' hang around, waiting for armed police, who would surely kill them? If they were heavily armed martyrs, why not kill themselves?
23. Why do the media bombard us with 'eyewitnesses saw this, unnamed sources saw that', yet all the raw footage is watermarked with a mainstream news outlets symbol? Who are these sources and eyewitnesses? Do they have a direct line to the news anchors?
24. Why is this incident still making headlines, when school bus crashes in pakistan, earthquakes, floods and other mass murders, barely get a few lines in the mainstream media?
25. If much larger PSy ops like 9/11, 7/7 and sandy hook can be staged, surely, this one should be a stroll? Only the newsreaders are telling us what happened, and they werent there! The 'victim' was a soldier, whats to say he hadn't died in combat, several months prior, and the 'powers that be' used this to their advantage? they wouldn't, would they?advantage? they wouldn't, would they?
~ Jeremy Haydon

Re: Question #12 - "Why did the PM have to cut his trip to france short, for a murder?"

Maybe coordinations for the French phase were arranged to proceed after he left there to manage the British COBRA plannings on UK communications crackdowns + the possibly related Sweden issues [Ref. Post #78 above], etc.:

Some Americans here would seemingly rather just go along with the official story of the alleged London Attack, I'm guessing not only because it jives closely with their immigration/religious/racial strife perspectives but partly because the communications and extremism crackdown motivations for a staging, with ramifications impacting the EU as well as the UK, are far removed from us.

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

Manufacturing Consent for France's continued Military Operations/War in Africa, perhaps.

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

I have never seen so much wide ranging aversion and now this level of reactiveness over a simple evidence photo presentation in all of my time here. Just sayin'.

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

The degree of probable success in your convoluted theory is off the chart, in a negative direction.

It’s sad for you to think that something other than Rigby’s body was lying in the street. If it were anything else, your conspiracy net would have to widen to include the witnesses who checked for a pulse, the gathered crowd, all the emergency responders, and the ME who conducted the autopsy. How any rational person could believe that such a scenario could be successfully constructed, never mind held tightly among themselves for the rest of their lives, shows me a new level of naiveté.

You finish your conjecture by describing people who see this event as nothing more than a vicious street crime as folks who are steered by their personal religious, immigration related, or political biases. You completely dismiss life experience and common sense. I find your flawed insight outweighed only by a child-like imagination.

You still haven’t demonstrated how the government could have persuaded two individuals to stage the incident, wait around to be shot and arrested for murder, knowing full well they will never again be free men.

I'm always astonished when people express so much disdain for any possibility that someone might not have suffered to death and could still be alive, for all we really know.

I tried to address your issues and think that it is you who have convoluted the level of conspiratorial involvement, not me. I stated that only a small production company would have had to be involved directly or indirectly. Since I'm not convinced at this point about a number of things in the official version that you and others presume on faith to be true and factual, I do not take for granted that there actually was a victim body and an autopsy of it conducted, although I haven't ruled out those possiblities; nor that the alleged victim might have died but not been murdered or not killed there. I don't take for granted either that the two alleged suspects were actually shot, arrested and charged with murder to really face lengthy imprisonment for their parts in what I suspect could be a scripted staging.

To many it's been an unquestionably closed case almost immediately but it isn't so in my opinion. I find it astounding that so many here, including you, have ignored every appeal to assess the clear photographic evidence posted repeatedly that something is deceptively being hidden about this case as to the perp scene. Instead, I'm assessed as dismissing life experience and common sense and so on in a negative direction. I think the reflexive acceptance of this British news story shows a surprising level of naiveté from those I expected were more aware of covert orchestrated Ops and foreign aligned agents of influence in high places who are essentially at war on the sly with the populace there and here and elsewhere, so are not likely to alert their target audiences much when they are being deceptive for legislative purposes or war agendas or whatever. I'm even taken aback a bit at my own naiveté for overestimation of the numbers on that wavelength and underestimation about the intensity of US opposition to further investigation of this overseas UK matter.

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

The potential upside of a cover-up, to the devastating downside of a cover-up being discovered is incalculable. With that said, may God bless and keep you, in nomine patri, et fili spiritu sancte, amen.

You can get that one, JT. They used fake bullets. The kind that don't really kill people. They were just pretending to be shot. They're actors. If they go to jail whoever hired them won't have to pay them. If they go to jail.

Fake bullets, store front mannequins, a sprinkling of paid onlookers who tweeted in live time, bogus cell phone interviews from the scene, vials of fake blood used by actors, all done amid a sea of government conspirators who have taken a vow of silence in order to conceal an as yet unidentified motive....

" I find it astounding that so many here, including you, have ignored every appeal to assess the clear photographic evidence ..."

I find it equally astounding that some here consider this a false flag. And there is no "clear photographic evidence" to support this. THere are just some dodgy interpretations of what some pics show.

Damn. I just made myself sick thinking about that. Damn. See what sarcasm gets you?

No offense intended but honestly , what you suggest is sarcasticly unrealistic and unrelated.

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) (It's a more positive message)

here's my thoughts on the matter. i think both sides have asked some very good questions, including the 25 in wud's post above, which cannot be answered by any of us. they are good questions nonetheless. because of those, i am on the fence about this and the Boston marathon incident.

but i will offer this--since i KNOW that they perpetrate false flags and staged events, my inclination is to suspect that that is what it is until it's proven to me that it isn't.

I've never seen a woman walk nonchalantly past a man with bloodied hands and knives, no.

Where we differ are in the answers to those questions, and how those answers are arrived at.

For example there is a post here somewhere (this is hard to keep track of) that supposedly show some sort of fake blood packet being opened. I sure can't see that. This is just one example.

Then there are those that don't like it when we don't see the same things they say are so very evident.

The following commentary, video, and photos were sent to me via email by a good friend and very knowledgeable individual who blogs at www.gasskammer.blogspot.com. Minor edits have been made by me, John Friend.

__________________________

Turn off audio. In the beginning: watch carefully. The woman sitting by the soldier on the street is stroking/caressing his back. Like a mother would do to a hurt/sad child. (To "woo" somebody?) But to do this with a corpse??? (And a corpse that's maybe or maybe not missing a head.)

Also: If he was not dead - these women would have screamed and yelled for help, wouldn't they? For an ambulance, a doctor, first aid, something. Or made a bandage from some clothes, or something like that. But they're doing nothing to help. Except the one woman who's stroking/caressing the soldier's back. (Eh... is this what someone who's just been cut with big knives needs? Stroking and caressing? How about stopping the bleeding? As surely one bleeds when one has been cut with big knives a few minutes earlier.)

Did the soldier guy die at all? At what point did he die? If he died before these women came, then why sit and caress his back? If he died after, who discovered his death and when?

Another funny pic:

Several things are peculiar here:

Where the hell did all those people suddenly come from? I mean, there's just been gunfire. Cops shot two guys. People didn't run away? And the people are allowed to hang around?
They're almost stepping on the soldier guy. No-one wants to put a blanket over him or something? It's like he's just decoration, or something of no relevance. [Ed note: it's like he's a prop in a PSYOP]

And, was the guy dead or wasn't he? Nobody wants to check?

Very busy talking about something. Nobody minds the poor probably-dead guy. The guy to the left is checking his text messages. The others are talking to each other.

The women aren't that concerned about the dead/almost dead guy though. First they make some conversation with one of the "terrorists." Really? People believe this?

Later one of the women decide it's time to sit down with the dead/almost dead guy and stroke his back. The two other women obviously feel that one woman is enough for back-stroking, and focus on conversation instead.

Terrorist guy has forgotten everything about killing the soldier guy. I mean, he's probably still alive since the lady is stroking his back, right?

Or was it the other way around, maybe?

Not sure. Anyway, here nobody's very interested in the well-being of the soldier:

Watch the clip again. .... It's all very weird. Very, very weird.

________________________

Very, very weird indeed. The people accepting and promoting the official story are essentially saying this depiction of what happened is true (click to enlarge):

Do you really believe this? Really?

I have publicly challenged Mike Delaney, Scott Roberts, and Andre Anglin to a debate regarding this event and my views on media fakery and PSYOPS in general. Stay tuned for that discussion folks, you won't want to miss it!

I'll give you an example. I told an employee to call 911 after another employee got shot. She said "But I don't know how!!!" So I had to do it.

Then I had to work up the balls to go out there, not knowing what I'd find, because for all I knew she was still alive and bleeding out. That too will mess with ones head; it sure messed with mine. No one else was doing anything, so I did it. That could have been fatal for me too.

I'm not only leery of what's reported on the MSM, but also that which is reported on the Internet.

It's much easier to put up a YouTube video making all sorts of wild claims that have no basis in fact than it is for a production crew to stage a "fake" event in the middle of Boston during a live televised event with thousands of actual bystanders present at the event itself, incorporating the entire city of Boston police department, EMT personnel, hospital trauma teams, etc., as part of the "fakery".

Same goes for this London incident, where the range of people who would need to be involved is enourmous.

Seeing people post questionable "proof" on Internet forums only raises the question as to WHY some people are so adament that these events are all "fake".

that's a very good point, but i have to say. i am amazed by the *miracle* bloodless victims! ;)

Sorry to burst your Karnak bubble, but you don't know what she knows. We can all agree on that.

OTOH, I'd like a $10 dollar bill for every time I've seen a person scoot under signs like the one pictured above.

I think there is a sympathetic, knee jerk reaction to Muslim crime, based on past false flag incidents. BTW, not to excuse the London murder, but the Muzzie made valid points in his video confession, vis a vis, Britain's foreign policy.

I know they used computer software to fake tint his hands and knives red. I know he didn't have blood on his hands or knives. I know that she would have known that too as he was in front of her field of vision. I know that. It's not a matter of opinion.

So help me understand your comment; she's part of the acting troupe because you know she saw the perp apply tint to various body parts?

No Blood On Hands London Beheading Video Debunked! (Video)

A lot of you are going on about this video of the London beheading where it appears the man has no blood on his hands to prove that this event was a false flag.

This cropped zoomed and altered version of the video is nothing more than a slight adjustment in the hue and saturation to make it appear as if there is no blood on the mans hands.

You that have watched the video that I speak of will notice that the mans hands are unnaturally orange due to this and the red paint line on the street has also changed to a reddish – orange color.

I believe in false flags and I believe in conspiracy theories. But I also know Youtube channels will make up stuff and alter videos to create a conspiracy to make that almighty Youtube advertising dollar.

Here is a video I made using the original clip then altering it using the hue and saturation to make it appear as if there is no blood on the mans hands very similar to the video I am speaking of.

Here is a link to the original Youtube source video that was used in the “no blood on hands” video. As you can see it was zoomed and cropped and edited. But it was not edited for the “no blood on hands effect”, That was just an accidental by product of poor video editing.