See other Resistance Articles
Title: Did the Mossad Shoot Up the Santa Monica Bus?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://nodisinfo.com/Home/15203/
Published: Jun 10, 2013
Author: .
Post Date: 2013-06-10 13:46:44 by wudidiz
Ping List: *Black Ops - Psyops* Subscribe to *Black Ops - Psyops*
Keywords: None
Views: 219
Comments: 11
With all those cars shot-up across the area plus an apparent arson, could rogue gangs of Mossad agents have been responsible? Here is an eyewitness account which pins this on a rogue element which has all the appearance of secretive Mossad thugs: In fact, it was shot at but not to kill or injure, just to create the appearance of real gunfire by shooting and cracking a few windows. Only a few bullet holes are evident. Note the CCTV camera. Why doesn’t anyone produce that revealing film? Is it because it would reveal these Mossad moles in action? Update: the types of bullets used are unknown, whether real killer-style or rubber or other. From one of our posters: http://flexcup.com/2626133-How_to_Build_a_Target_for_Wax_Bullets.html From this website: http://www.stripes.com/news/simunition-adds-a-bit-of-realism-including-pain-to-training-1.45405 The bus was quickly moved from the area of the shooting and then loaded onto a flatbed trailer, likely never to be seen again. No forensics effort was attempted. More fakery. What follows is one of the most crucial revelations of this investigation, which essentially proves that this event was a clandestine effort done by a secretive group, assuredly the Mossad: ABC reporter: You were across the street in that green area behind you. And you heard the shots. Tell us exactly what you saw, what happened? Tangway: I was walking down the sidewalk and coming back to get my car at Jiffy Lube. The bus was parked, there. Some gunfire went off (which means Tangway was there right when it started, which is crucial). I didn’t know what was going on. The bus pulled away, and there was the guy, the gunman, standing there holding his AK-47. ABC reporter: And describe what he was wearing? Tangway: (speaks with confidence) Black military wear, like a black shirt, black pants, not (the typical) gang-banger at all, total, absolutely military style. I come from a military family… ABC reporter: There was a driver. Can you describe the driver and car he was in? Tangway: Yea, female driver, black hair, long black hair…and the car was a Mazda, like a blue-purple Mazda. ABC reporter: And Todd, you said something interesting to me early, you said that you didn’t think he was actually trying to hit anyone, because he was firing upwards, and there were lots (presumably) of people who might have been hurt had he intended to do so. Tangway: Yea, in my opinion had he wanted to shoot me, I mean, he was 25-feet away from me; there’s nothing between he and me but air; he could have shot me easily. But he was shooting up in the air…and other cars and windows–everything–else (had he been shooting lower) would have been broken. But none of that happened. ABC reporter: How many shots did he fire, and id you know how long the whole thing lasted? Tangway: There was 15-ish, it just kept going off and off and off. It seemed to go on. When I threw myself on the grass and I was rising there, I turned and looked at him, and I got a full look at his face, and he’s still looking up (at the upper level of the bus), and then he turned and looked into the car and said to the driver, “OK, let’s go.” It probably was…about 2 to 3 minutes. ABC reporter: Very methodical? Tangway: Yes, very methodical. It didn’t seem random at all. He had the whole stance own right–maybe he’s seen a lot of movies or may be military training. ABC reporter: And the people around you were just scrambling? Tangway: There was nobody. All the vehicles moved. So there was nobody there... Note: he then adds when asked about injuries that he saw none of any kind but that, likely through reports he had heard that presumably someone suffered a graze injury in the bus, but also said that he couldn’t tell what kind of bus it was so thus had no first-hand knowledge of any injuries. Upon further questioning he did confirm that had the shooter been shooting lower that he felt there would have been many injuries (here, he is assuming the bus was occupied) but that “I don’t know why he was shooting in the air.” ABC reporter: We understand that you spoke with police and shared that information with them. Tangway: 100%, that’s the first thing I did. ABC reporter: (now at) Cloverfied and Pecos. I did speak to an officer, who told me that there were several locations they were investigating, something that occurred on 19th St, on 9th St…and then the Santa Monica school at the library at Santa Monica City College. And he also mentioned so many law enforcement agencies were also here because of the President’s visit: Therefore, this is a fake skit, where these actors were assigned a role. The vehicle fits nearly the precise description, surely by color, of the Mossad get-away vehicle. It means that these moles were hell-bent on blasting as many windows out as possible to create the appearance of a wild massacre, though not intending to wound or kill anyone. When the bus scam was completed, these spies then parked the car and likely at that time shot out the windows. The actors then took their places. There is a red fluid under her hand. Yet, there is no obvious flesh wound. Regardless, according to the eye-witness the purplish-blue colored car was occupied by the window-shooter and a woman with dark, long hair, not this blonde-haired woman. With no blood on the car seats or anywhere else, it is then reasonable to presume that this is mere fake blood: no arterial bleeding. Looking high and low, still no evidence of real bleeding, and no blood on the pavement. Therefore, all those claiming to have been injured are actors and frauds. The deaths, too, are faked. Regarding the findings of this post these are most crucial to breaking this case. That finding, as edified by eyewitness Tangway, is that a rogue element, almost assuredly Zionist agents, went about creating chaos within the land by shooting out windows with live ammunition. This was then used as the basis to make the Santa Monica hoax appear realistic. Poster Comment: Important: there is not a single clear, obvious picture of anyone who has been severely or even moderately wounded and not a single picture or video image of a shooter or anyone who has been killed. There should surely be evidence of people who were really shot up, bleeding, limping, dying, and more. Yet, there is no such evidence anywhere. No fake gore this time. In fact, in multiple Google searches for photos/images of wounded people this was virtually all that could be found: What is the purpose of the world seeing this picture other than an inane fake to influence people’s minds? Regardless, what does a feeble ice bag laying on a knee have to do with a wild massacre? Moreover, here she is, again, with the same two friends, playing it up before the cameras, setting the stage for the phony ice bag. Is this the best the Zionists can do in their scam is following around a woman with a purported sprained knee? If she was such a major source of attention, why not the really wounded? Why not the woman with the bullet holes in the head, the woman with the supposed blown out shoulder, the deceased: why no pictures of them? Even the fire was a controlled event. Let someone prove otherwise. There was no one in there; the Fire Department was there in advance. No need for rescue teams, detectives, coroners, or forensics, because rather than a crime scene it was a government-sponsored drill. How much was this man paid for the role of being handcuffed? What is the fireman doing there? Seem pretty relaxed for arresting a suspected mass murderer. “Hold on a minute. We can’t put you in the squad car, yet. Got to wait for Feinstein’s showboat display by her collaborators.” Truly, can anyone fathom it? The fact is it is just as fake as can be seen, above, that is it is all merely a diabolical, if not hideous, show. “There he is. One of the suspects. They nabbed him. Oh, but wait a minute. It wasn’t him; he was released.” His non-disclosure form will surely prevent him from speaking even so much as a single word. Plenty of phonies and frauds willing to fake the terror for a paycheck; these people are categorically actors. One photo-shoot is not sufficient for this fraudster. She’s fairly good in the fake grief role; so two shots with a mere parking garage employee to console her. Regardless, what’s she in shock about? No one was injured, and, surely, no one died. It must be asked, repeatedly, “Was it really worth it to lie to the world?” The only real element: the implementation of yet another day of Martial Law. Plenty of fire-power for a man who all sources said, “acted alone.” Moles everywhere. Do you trust these individuals, or do you trust your own eyes? 
Rogue gangs of Mossad thugs roam the streets and cities of the United States with reckless abandon, perpetrating a wide range of terror attacks against Americans, some real and others faked. In this regard there is no doubt about it a blue city bus was shot-up on June 6, 2013. It wasn’t much of a shoot-up, though. There are only a few obvious bullet holes on the bus, mostly in the upper aspects of the windows. Moreover, in all likelihood there was no one on the bus; in other words, it was a set-up. It had to be empty as well as free of any active agents or drivers; otherwise, the CCTV camera would have picked up the action, that is unless it was shut-off. There would have also surely been a number of people who could have witnessed to the nature of any real shooter, identifying him–giving a reasonable good visual of such a one’s appearance, clothing, and type of gun used. 
Yet, what kind of bus was it? Furthermore, was it empty of passengers, or were there real ones inside? Clearly, as will be demonstrated here according to a direct eyewitness there was at least a driver inside. Note the side-panel showing the military helicopter over the city. Is that not incredible? Regardless, the casual nature of the strike and the fact that the bus was parked would lend to the belief that other than the driver perhaps no one was on board. If anyone can provide evidence otherwise, that is welcomed.
“There are many types of simunition, including the paint and wax rounds that are nonlethal; rubber and plastic bullets with reduced trajectory; and “fangible” ammunition that is nontoxic, does not ricochet or “splash” fragments back at the shooter. 
Caption: Finally, a straight-shooting no-nonsense person, Todd Tangway 
Editor’s note: The color is a perfect fit. Could this have been the Mossad operational vehicle. It is surely likely, since this is the one dropped off right near the controlled burn. At this point the Mossad operatives had escaped, with the actors taking their place. 
Blood packet bleeding? Again, no natural spread or spewing of blood; no evidence of any flesh wound; the agony would be intense. What is the woman doing with her right hand? Is she a fake blood drizzler? 
More Proof Santa Monica Attack is a Fake
UPDATED: More Proof Santa Monica Attack is a Fake
The Santa Monica so-called terror attack is a fake like the others. No one died, and no one was injured. The entire event was under the control of espionage agencies: all events were heavily controlled. Moreover, this is confirmed by the evidence provided by the Zionist-controlled media itself. Lies are continuously told about Sandy Hook and Boston. Why would Santa Monica be different? 
What in the world is this? It’s a Ziploc bag, but a different kind: one with ice. Is this the best that Hollywood can do? An ice bag placed on what is likely a non-injured knee? 
The second photo-op is just as phony as the first. Moreover, if everyone is supposed to be on the other side of the police tape, what is she doing there? Surely, too, the camera-person in normal circumstances is also disallowed from crossing that line, as is this supposed parking garage attendant. Do these scoundrels really have to make us endure her twice? Regardless, clearly these are photo-ops, which lends even further proof that this is a scam. They liked this faker. 
Someone has just rampaged about with a powerful gun, a “big black one,” and this is the kind of reaction of the people. It can be seen that virtually everyone has an I-Phone. No footage of the shooter in action, victims going down, blood, or videos of the wounded and killed? How about even a single photo? Nothing? Someone would be bloody. The doctor said there were head wounds. In fact, there will be no photos produced of any wounded people, because no one was wounded and no one killed. 
Subscribe to *Black Ops - Psyops*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
#4. To: wudidiz (#0)
Uhhh, surveillance cameras everywhere isn't exactly the method I would choose to ward off martial law.
You're missing the larger picture, evidence doesn't matter, it's been deemed a *False Flag Event!* and that settles it. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to close my blinds to keep the Mossad from peeking in my window, never mind that it's 97 degrees outside and my yard is full of 6,000,000 jew-chewin' Nazi chiggers.....
Silly me, I thought there was an attempt at an honest discussion. :)
There are no replies to Comment # 6. End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestNo footage of the shooter in action, victims going down, blood, or videos of the wounded and killed? How about even a single photo? Nothing?
#5. To: Dakmar (#4)
#6. To: X-15 (#5)
Replies to Comment # 6.