[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11 See other 9/11 Articles Title: Prism is to catch you not Terrorists My topic last week was Swallowing Camels and Straining at Gnats. Well here is a good example of how that works. I subscribe to The New American on line and got a story they did on the Snowden whistle blowing incident and what Dick Chaney and FBI director Robert Mueller said to cool the outrage over the Prism project that spies on all emails, phone calls and file transfers of everyone in the world. The title to the New American story was Would NSAs Prism Have Prevented 9/11? The article opened by saying: Former Vice President Dick Cheney said on Fox News Sunday this week that if the National Security Agency's daily collection of private telephone records and Internet messages had been in place before the 9/11 attacks in 2001, the terrorists' plot might have been foiled. Rep. Mike Rogers (R- Mich.) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairmen, respectively, of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, are among the public officials who have made similar claims in defense of the NSA's controversial PRISM program. Then the New American article quoted Chaney and added their clarifying comments: As everybody who's been associated with the program's said, if we had had this before 9/11, when there were two terrorists in San Diego two hijackers had been able to use that program, that capability, against that target, we might well have been able to prevent 9/11, Cheney told host Chris Wallace. The hijackers Cheney referenced were Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, who were sharing a residence in San Diego from January 2000 until a few months before the September 11, 2001 attacks. The New American also quoted Mueller and added their comments: If we had the telephone number from Yemen, we would have matched it up to that telephone number in San Diego, got further legal process, identified al-Mihdhar ... The 9/11 Commission itself indicated that investigations or interrogations of al-Mihdhar, once he was identified, could have yielded evidence of connections to other participants in the 9/11 plot. But Mueller, in that same testimony, seemed to be saying the intelligence officials had the number of the safe house. The rest of the article goes into detail showing how the NSA had access to all the information they needed to uncover the plot without any of the Prism surveillance program by showing the known connections between the terrorist suspects mentioned by Chaney and Mueller. Now at first glace some people may think that this is good insightful and logical journalism that reveals some real truth that people can use to defend their rights. This whole article is misleading and useless to anyone. There isnt, in fact, one shred of evidence linking any of the so-called terrorist suspects to the supposed hijackings that took place that day. Federal aviation records show that flights 11 and 93 never took off or left the ground and were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11/01. There are no records showing or proving that any of the 19 suspects boarded flights 77 and 175 or 11 and 93, no ticket stubs, no computer reservations, no nothing! There is one grainy video or one guy taken in the main lobby of some airport that was shown over and over but it was not taken near a gate to any flight that day. Further, the government refuses to investigate the discovery of evidence supporting the use of over ten tons of super nanothermite recently created in US military labs used in the demolition of the 110 story Twin Towers and the 47 story Building 7 at the WTC revealed in all dust samples taken from the site. This proves only one thing the government knows that the 9/11 attack was not done by Muslim hijackers at all but by those who had controlled and secured access to the entire WTC to plan and plant explosive throughout the three sky scrapers. Now thats the camel, and if you swallow that, you are left with only straining to avoid swallowing the gnats or irrelevant details and lies surrounding the event. So then what is the Prism Surveillance program really all about? Its certainly not about trying to apprehend terrorists or prevent terrorism. It is to find out what the American people are planning to do about all the government tyranny and mass murder it has done related to 9/11. Prism is to protect those criminals hiding in government from you. The government wants to prosecute you for finding out the truth. Articles that strain at gnats instead of exposing the camel are of no use to the people in breaking free from tyranny and dissolved unlawful government. Ron Avery is a semi-retired architect, author and speaker on topics regarding Christian theology and the principles of property that regulate every aspect of lawful government. Poster Comment: Uh huh Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: christine (#0)
(Edited)
the National Security Agency's daily collection of private telephone records and Internet messages ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|