Title: Exposing Adam Kokesh AND making some fine pancakes while doing it. Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Jun 29, 2013 Author:f Post Date:2013-06-29 09:51:50 by PSUSA2 Keywords:None Views:540 Comments:38
Adam Charles Kokesh is an American libertarian anti-war activist, podcaster, and anarcho-capitalist.
Well, ya, he's a lunatic.
Oh, I see from wiki he's Jewish, which I suspected from his rat-like face. My jewdar is improving.
TotalFascism has it right:
Adam Kokesh is simply fulfilling his genetic program by promoting this divisive, pointless and childish doctrine of anarchism to the masses of basement dwelling potheads. He is also able to embrace his biological hatred for actual work by getting stoned and rambling incoherently while asking for donations and hocking “precious” metals and various other snake oil scams. Once again, it is silly to consider what sort of a thing is going through the mind of a Jew. He might believe that he believes this. I certainly do not think his stupidity is faked.
He might believe that he believes this. I certainly do not think his stupidity is faked.
He's not stupid. He just has a little group of followers in his personality cult that he can manipulate for his own ends, and maybe for the PTBs ends. He's a mini-me to Alex Jones's Dr Evil.
What anarchists fail to understand is that some government is necessary. But how to keep the psychopaths out?
Definition of ANARCHIST 1 : a person who rebels against any authority, established order, or ruling power 2 : a person who believes in, advocates, or promotes anarchism or anarchy; especially : one who uses violent means to overthrow the established order
Now some define themselves as anarchist by adding a modifier to the word, perhaps because it's the edgy thing to do and they want to seem more intellectual and therefore cool, and it helps with who to invite for their circle-jerks by keeping The Others out, but my definition is correct, like it or not.
We have a right to rebel. But our founders weren't anarchists.
But that's not the argument these days, it's limited government vs total government, with the limited govt side being casts as kooks, scofflaws, and terrorists. If you want, I can find recent link that says 26% of Obama supporters think tea party is bigger terrorist threat than radical Islamists.
, I can find recent link that says 26% of Obama supporters think tea party is bigger terrorist threat than radical Islamists.
And I can show you that about 70% believe jesus saves them from their sins and the devil is to blame for the bad things because he convinced Eve to eat some fruit.
And I can show you that about 70% believe jesus saves them from their sins and the devil is to blame for the bad things because he convinced Eve to eat some fruit.
It doesn't bother me at all. You're the one that brought up the TP numbers, not me. But people believe strange things because it's in a book or in the newspaper or in a political forum or some VIP said it or because they were raised that way. That doesn't make them right. It just makes them sincere.
But people believe strange things because it's in a book or in the newspaper or in a political forum or some VIP said it or because they were raised that way. That doesn't make them right.
Yeah, like those idiots who think opposing authority = anarchy. What a bunch of dolts.
You just proved everyone is an anarchist, it's documented. Are you wanting to chain yourself in a cell? It's kinky, but I won't try to talk you out of it, but I will vote against any law that indulges you with my tax dollar.
you put forward the proposition that opposition to authority = anarchy
I said it (opposition) was rebellion, not anarchy.
2. a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.
That's more accurate than what the first definition stated *which btw wasn't my definition. If I made any mistake, it was in choosing a weak dictionary definition, initially. Under those terms of the 1st definition I posted, a voter could be an anarchist.