Title: George Zimmerman Trial Juror #b37 Does Interview With Her Identity Concealed Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcdSZw2-C18 Published:Jul 15, 2013 Author:staff Post Date:2013-07-15 23:24:10 by Horse Keywords:None Views:727 Comments:33
Poster Comment:
This juror clears up a lot that the media said but was not true.
(CNN) -- One of the jurors who acquitted George Zimmerman said she had "no doubt" he feared for his life in the final moments of his struggle with Trayvon Martin, and that was the definitive factor in the verdict.
The juror spoke to CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360" on Monday night. Her identity was concealed.
She said she believed Zimmerman's "heart was in the right place" the night he killed Martin, but that he didn't use "good judgment" in confronting the Florida teen.
"I think George Zimmerman is a man whose heart was in the right place, but just got displaced by the vandalism in the neighborhoods and wanting to catch these people so badly that he went above and beyond what he really should have done.But I think his heart was in the right place. It just went terribly wrong," she said.
If anything, Zimmerman was guilty of not using "good judgment," the juror said.
"When he was in the car, and he had called 911, he shouldn't have gotten out of that car," she said.
She also said she believes Martin threw the first punch in their confrontation.
So the Juror believe zimmerman was guilty but that it was ok... because his heart was in the right place when he was murdering trayvon.
Trayvon was being stalked and followed in his own neighborhood by some stranger he did not know, who came up to him. If stand your ground law has an application surely trayvon had a right to stand his ground if George was the aggressor.... we can not be sure that is the truth... but we can be sure it was not Zimmerman begging for his life. Of this we can be certain.
you obviously didn't LISTEN to the whole interview. he didn't break the friggin' law. that was what was judged in the case. she said many many times that they all believed it was SELF DEFENSE on Zimmerman's part.
YOu know... so many focused on race with this whole trial.... too few focused on age.... Trayvon could barely grow peach fuzz on his scraggly face. Zimmerman being a man of sufficient age should of been able to discern that and handled himself better.... instead he killed a kid. Trayvon was not old enough to vote.
Either he was wrong or he was right but he was not both.
instead he killed a kid. Trayvon was not old enough to vote.
People are guilty of bad judgment every frickin' day......that doesn't mean they are breaking the law. However, bad judgment can lead people to break the law. Trayvon may not have been old enough to vote but he was old enough for assault. The assault based on the assumption that the "creepy ass cracker" was unarmed was bad judgment on his part that led to his death.