[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Why I think the verdict was NOT GUILTY right from the begining
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 16, 2013
Author: 4umer
Post Date: 2013-07-16 21:57:45 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 97
Comments: 4

1. First off I don't know why there were not 12 Jurors.

Maybe 12 would have been easier to get a 'hung Jury'.

2. We are to have a Jury of our peers.

That would mean 'men' in this case. 3 black 3 white(to make it fair)? Hung Jury most likely.

3. Select 6 women. Who feels more threatened when attacked. Women would feel great with an 'equalizer' like a gun.

I rest my case.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)

Niggers got spoiled by the OJ verdict. This trial took place in a city where the bad guys were unable to get their kind in there to manipulate the jury and nullify the case. Now they're acting like children who can't have what they want. Sometimes ya gotta tell a child "no". It builds character.

Support bacteria.

(The world needs more culture)

Obnoxicated  posted on  2013-07-16   22:12:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Obnoxicated (#1)

politicalblindspot.org/ge...ons-of-criminal-activity/

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) (It's a more positive message)

titorite  posted on  2013-07-16   22:59:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: titorite (#2)

Trayvon's girlfriend Tubeneck said Trayvon thought GZ was a homosexual rapist, which meant TM intended to commit a hate crime against another federally protected species, but hey, what can ya do?

Support bacteria.

(The world needs more culture)

Obnoxicated  posted on  2013-07-16   23:18:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Itistoolate (#0)

The verdict was not guilty because the state had no case. It was a political trial which would never have been brought but for pressure put on by people who should have stayed out of it. They had no case and they have no civil rights violation case either. Two of the grounds they might have sued under under that theory would have been racial animus (hate crime and there was and is absolutely no evidence of that, indeed the evidence indicates that Zimmerman had no problem with minorities). The other theory would be a violation of rights under color of law and that doesn't work in this case because Zimmerman is not a cop or any kind of government agent.

Americans who have no experience with, or knowledge of, tyranny believe that only terrorists will experience the unchecked power of the state. They will believe this until it happens to them, or their children, or their friends.

Paul Craig Roberts

James Deffenbach  posted on  2013-07-16   23:35:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]