See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: You Did Not Go to the Moon
Source:
IntelliHub
URL Source: http://intellihub.com/2013/07/08/you-did-not-go-to-the-moon/
Published: Jul 19, 2013
Author: Avalon
Post Date: 2013-07-19 21:26:27 by Original_Intent
Ping List: *US INDUSTRIAL WAR MACHINE* Subscribe to *US INDUSTRIAL WAR MACHINE*
Keywords: NASA, Moon, real, fake
Views: 239
Comments: 14
NASA Mission Control Engineer Raymond Teagues Quoting A Russian Scientist and Colleagues on the Apollo Moon Landings by Avalon The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has named these three astronauts as the prime crew of the Apollo 11 lunar landing mission. Left to right, are Neil A. Armstrong, commander; Michael Collins, command module pilot; and Edwin E. Aldrin Jr., lunar module pilot. The 30th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon mission is celebrated July 20, 1999. (Photo by NASA/Newsmakers) Air Force Veteran and NASA Mission Operations Control Room Engineer Raymond F. Teague, who appeared on the Alex Jones InfoWars.com broadcast July 3, 2013, discussed his experience with the Apollo Missions to the Moon. Among many of his memories as a NASA MOCR, he recalled how he discussed his uncertainty on whether the Apollo Missions to the Moon ever actually took place – specifically the Manned Missions and landing on the Moon. The Apollo Manned Missions include Apollo 10 through 17, which took place from 1969 through 1972. Raymond F. Teague, like many others of his generation, worked in highly compartmentalized areas of the Apollo Mission that is further detailed at http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/lunar/apollo.html NASA celebrated the 30 year anniversary of Apollo 11, which was the first Manned Mission that landed and stepped foot on the Moon on 20 July 1969 in the Sea of Tranquility. The Apollo Program was from 1963 to 1972. The Apollo program was designed to land humans on the Moon and bring them safely back to Earth. Six of the missions (Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17) achieved this goal. Apollos 7 and 9 were Earth orbiting missions to test the Command and Lunar Modules, and did not return lunar data. Apollos 8 and 10 tested various components while orbiting the Moon, and returned photography of the lunar surface. Apollo 13 did not land on the Moon due to a malfunction, but also returned photographs. The six missions that landed on the Moon returned a wealth of scientific data and almost 400 kilograms of lunar samples. Experiments included soil mechanics, meteoroids, seismic, heat flow, lunar ranging, magnetic fields, and solar wind experiments. During his tenure working with the Apollo Program as a NASA Mission Operations Control Room Engineer, Mr. Teague recalled a discussion with a patriotic Russian Colleague over the Moon Landings. When asked if he believed that Americans actually landed on the Moon and walked around, he reportedly said, No – You did NOT go to the Moon, it was ALL staged! Source: NASA Secrets Revealed The Apollo Manned Mission Landings are a very complex and controversial topic as to whether they actually occurred as depicted on Television back in 1969 through 1972. Certainly, if these missions did happen there would be conclusive proof of these landings today. Simply put, there would be physical evidence on the Moon that would indicate Men landed there and left behind the Lander Assembly, the Lunar Rover and other equipment. A number of images have recently been released to the public of the landing sites, but the requests to have higher resolution imaging done have been ignored. As Raymond F. Teague pointed out, why not have the Hubble Telescope or similar telescope image the landing sites? The answer to this question is probably that the images will prove that the Apollo Moon Landings actually did not happen, and no visible tracks or Lunar Rover is on the Moon to substantiate a human presence or expedition as claimed. There is so much more to this story – possibly one of the biggest stories of all time. The entire world watched the Apollo 11 Landing on television back in 1969 and the technology back then was primitive compared to today. One of the biggest theories is that Film Director Stanly Kubrick was tasked with staging the entire event and crafted a protocol for faking the filming in terms of photographic and modeling techniques. Interestingly, International Business Times posted an article on April 04 2013 by Palash Ghosh, which completely discredits itself from the outset. The article, Space Odyssey: Were The Apollo Moon Landings Faked By Film Director Stanley Kubrick?, begins by using the term Conspiracy Theorist – quoting from the article: Conspiracy theorists have long maintained that man has never really landed on the Moon – that the fabled Apollo moon missions were fraudulent and “orchestrated” by NASA. Over the past 40-plus years since Neil Armstrong first (allegedly) took that “small step for man,” naysayers have spewed a bewildering array of arguments claiming the Apollo missions were fake. One of the most interesting strands in these web of conspiracy theories has to do with the renowned American filmmaker Stanley Kubrick, who had released the science-fiction epic “2001: A Space Odyssey” in April 1968, more than a year before Armstrong’s historic Apollo 11 mission to the moon. Conspiracy buffs believe that U.S. technology simply could not have engineered the extraordinary undertaking of sending a spacecraft almost a quarter-billion miles to the Moon and safely landed astronauts on the surface – then brought them back to earth in one piece. Some also suggest that the entire space program was “staged” in a game of one-upmanship with the USSR. Establishing the proof of the Apollo Moon Landings remains insurmountable for NASA and Hubble in terms of photographic telescopic from the Hubble Space Telescope. Google maintains a Google Map of the Apollo Landing sites which clearly lacks any resolution establishing a landing site or remaining landing vehicle platform. In the Google image, one sees only an outline of the Lunar Landing Platform which was left behind when the Lunar Landing Module lifted off to establish an orbit and link up with the Command Module. The image from Google Maps is interesting and shows the current landing sites in low resolution – this is proof? Charles Duke, acting as CAPCOM during the landing phase, acknowledged their landing by saying “We copy you down, Eagle.” Lastly, after many years of speculation and doubt on whether the Apollo Manned Missions landed on the Moon in 1969, Space.com released an image that is featured in an article posted only months ago on March 13, 2012 at 07:00 AM ET. The article, Apollo 11 Moon Landing Site Seen in Unprecedented Detail includes an image that is high resolution that shows in some detail, the Lunar Lander Assembly that remains on the Moon, the article reads: The clearest view yet of the famous Apollo 11 landing site on the moon was captured by a NASA spacecraft in orbit around our planet’s natural satellite. The agency’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) zeroed in on Mare Tranquillitatis, or the Sea of Tranquility — the place where humans first touched down on the lunar surface on July 20, 1969. The new image from LRO captures amazing details of the historic site, even revealing the remnants of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin’s first steps on the moon. A recent Coast to Coast AM video with George Noory and guest Jay Weidner discuss the Moon Landings and the involvement of Stanley Kubrick’s technical expertise in staging the Moon Landings. Quoting the biography located on Coast to Coast with George Noory about Jay Weidner: Called by Wired Magazine an “authority on the hermetic and alchemical traditions,” and “erudite conspiracy hunter,” Jay Weidner is a renowned author, filmmaker and hermetic scholar. Considered to be a ‘modern-day Indiana Jones’ for his ongoing worldwide quests to find clues to mankind’s spiritual destiny via ancient societies and artifacts, his body of work offers great insight into the circumstances that have led to the current global crisis. He is the director of the powerful and insightful documentaries, Kubrick’s Odyssey, Infinity; The Ultimate Trip, and the forthcoming feature film, Shasta. He is also the producer of the popular documentary films, 2012 The Odyssey and its sequel, Timewave 2013. Faked Moon Landing Stanley Kubrick Enigma’s 344 views on July 8, 2013 at 11:35 AM EST Coast to Coast AM Faked Moon Landing Stanley Kubrick Enigma’s Faked Moon Landings and Kubrick’s ‘The Shining’ Were the lunar landings faked? NASA Secrets Revealed Alex continues with former NASA mission control engineer Raymond Teagues discussing the American and Russian space programs, the missions to the moon and the secretive parts of the space programs both in the U.S. and Russia and why we have never returned to the moon. http://www.infowars.net/ & http://www.prisonplanet.tv Space Odyssey: Were The Apollo Moon Landings Faked By Film Director Stanley Kubrick? Moon landing conspiracy theories Apollo 11 “Columbia” NSSDC ID: 69-059A Apollo 11 Moon Landing Site Seen in Unprecedented Detail http://i.space.com/images/i/000/015/834/original/apollo-11-moon-landing-site.jpg?1331590994 Poster Comment: Just for the record - As I have said before I do believe the Lunar Missions DID take place, BUT due to the presence of artifacts from prior civilizations and habitations allowing the Serfs to learn that was verboten. It appears to be part of the large scale ongoing subjugation of this culture and planet. I do believe that some, or all, of the supposed video of the Lunar Landings was faked. I believe it was faked so that the PTB could avoid showing us what was actually there. So, of course, the question is why? Given the large scale ongoing conditioning programs, and the reality that we live in a very populated galaxy, it is my speculation that the belief exists, among the Psych Elite, that if we lowly serfs were allowed to learn that it would be such a mind expanding, paradigm shifting, event that it would ruin all of their long term "programming" by getting people to actually think and examine the universe in which they live.
Intellihub.com
July 3, 2013 
Armstrong acknowledged Aldrin’s completion of the post landing checklist with “Engine arm is off.” before responding to Duke with the words, “Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed.”
Published on May 22, 2013 SOURCE:
Published on May 22, 2013
344 views on July 8, 2013 at 11:35 AM EST
Coast to Coast AM
Jan 21, 2010 11:09 AM ET // by Robert Lamb
The Guardian, Thursday 12 September 2002
Published on Jul 3, 2013
By Palash Ghosh on April 04 2013 8:55 AM
SPACE.com Staff
Date: 13 March 2012 Time: 07:00 AM ET
Subscribe to *US INDUSTRIAL WAR MACHINE*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#7. To: Original_Intent (#0)
Nonsense. One of the first things that the Apollo 11 astronauts set up after landing was a retroflector. This was a very precisely made, fragile, parabolic reflector capable of reflecting laser beams from earth - back to the very spot from which the beams were sent. It had to be assembled, positioned and aimed Very Precisely, something only a human could do in 1969. While it was being positioned various observatories on earth were aiming laser beams at the moon, and they started getting the reflections as soon as the retroflector was in place. The retroflector, not having any moving parts nor requiring any sort of power, is the only Apollo item on the moon still functioning. It could not have worked unless humans put it into position on the moon at the very moment that the TV image shows they were doing it. Additionally, every time the astronauts walked on the moon, they did things for the camera that would have been impossible on earth, even in a Hollywood studio. For example, hitting a golf ball a mile. Numerous labs and observatories around the world, not just those working for the US govt, were able to listen in to radio communications from the Apollo rocket by use of the ultra short wave frequencies that can only be used for outer space communications. Regular shortwave could not be used for space communication because the wavelength causes it to bounce back to earth from the ionosphere so the signal hardly penetrates to outer space, but ultra high frequencies pass through the ionosphere and the only way that these labs could have received those signals is if they came from outer space, not from some place on earth.
#9. To: Shoonra (#7)
I think the confusion results from the fact that some of the "transmitted footage" was shot in a studio. Not all of it, but where the people running the Psych Control Programs thought that it might reveal something about the true state of affairs i.e., that we are not alone, studio footage was substituted. That is why there are obvious scenes in some of the footage, as pointed out by people who have analyzed the footage frame by frame, that are clearly anomalous and have mistakes in lighting angles and such. Do a search on line for the "Brookings Report" which was done for the nascent NASA in the late 50's/early 60's. The most telling section was where they spoke of the likelihood of encountering extraterrestrial artifacts and what effect knowledge that we are not alone would possibly have on the culture. Brookings recommended suppressing any such evidence. I'm sure that gladdened the vacant little hearts of the Intelligence industry - they just love having secrets and making everything secret.
Robots were capable of precision work in 1969. If you don't think so you should look at state of the art manufacturing in 1969.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 7.
#10. To: Shoonra (#7)
This was a very precisely made, fragile, parabolic reflector capable of reflecting laser beams from earth - back to the very spot from which the beams were sent. It had to be assembled, positioned and aimed Very Precisely, something only a human could do in 1969.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.