[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: Infowars compares baby-killers to "holocaust deniers," falsely mischaracterizes WWII revisionists http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/infowars-compares-baby-killers-holocaust-deniers-falsely-mischaracterizes-wwii-revisionists Infowars compares baby-killers to "holocaust deniers" An article by Mike Adams of NaturalNews.com which is posted at Infowars.com has compared infanticide advocates (those in favor of killing live, born babies) to holocaust deniers. The July 29th article, titled MSNBC host says newborn infants don't count as 'alive', criticises MSNBC TV host Melissa Harris-Perry and rightly asserts that killing a live baby is plainly murder and an outrageous thing for an tv host to advocate. However, Adams then goes on to repeatedly compare infanticide advocates to "modern-day holocaust deniers." It should be pointed out that Adams begins with a waffly apologist remark insisting that his article is not about the abortion debate itself, but rather only applicable to babies after they are born: In his article, Adams derides the "radical left" no less than six times, "radical leftist ideology" once, "the left" once, "liberals" five times, and "pro-abortion liberals" once. Yet he can't even find the courage to leave out his apologetic disclaimer and insist that not only is infanticide wrong, but that all abortion, regardless of what stage of pregancy it occurs at, is wrong too. As an actual Christian pro-lifer, I can state unapologetically and unequivocally that abortion is murder just as infanticide is. One is not better or worse than the other. Murder, the taking of a human life, is a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance, and there's no need to apologize to those who advocate 'early term' abortions. Below are some excerpts from Adams' Infowars article. Adams repeatedly asserts that those who support killing babies after they are born are "modern-day holocaust deniers," "the new holocaust deniers," and part of a "Hitler-style holocaust support network" with a "despicable, if not downright demonic" agenda. Adams even invokes an image of "a chorus of hooded Satan worshippers drinking the blood of the dead fetus" after comparing them to "holocaust deniers." A bit melodramatic for sure. I agree with Adams that infanticide is evil; and unlike Adams, who's not willing to go this far for some reason, I would contend that abortion is also purely evil and demonically inspired. However, "holocaust denial," or "historical revisionism" as it's often referred to, is not 'demonic,' it's not 'evil,' and it's not akin to infanticide, eugenics, or abortion. True and legitimate historical revisionism is not motivated by a desire for murder or by a racial or religious prejudice, as is often falsely asserted. Revisionism is most often a serious, non-emotional scholarly examination of historical events, an examination of data on the alleged gas chambers, and a study of the events surrounding World War II. For Adams to feel the need to liken eugenicists and baby-killers to 'holocaust deniers' and to compare holocaust deniers to so-called "leftists" no less than fourteen times reveals a serious misunderstanding, or worse yet, perhaps a purposelful deceptiveness on the part of the author. If anything, 'leftists' wholeheartedly agree with and vehmently defend the official mainstream holocaust narrative parroted by the establishment, the government, and the media. That official narrative is also parroted by Infowars, I might add, a site which usually scoffs at and seeks to entirely discredit the government narrative of historical events. I guess the official holohoax fable is the one thing that Infowars and the Government will always agree on 100%. Holocaust deniers are not "death worshippers" as Adams calls infanticide advocates. If anything, holocaust deniers try to deconstruct the false basis for all the modern world wars, and want to stop the Those of us who have examined the holocaust narrative and realized that it is to a large degree a 'holohoax,' so to speak, have come to this conclusion based on a completely unemotional examination of historical facts and research. People such as Bishop Richard Williamson, Michael A. Hoffman, Ernst Zundel, David Cole/Stein, Deanna Spingola, Dr. Nicholas Kollerstom, Hutton Gibson and groups such as the Institute for Historical Review, and the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH), as well as the plethora of well researched and sincere anti-Zionists out there, are not advocates of killing babies. Holocaust denial and infanticide have nothing whatsoever to do with each other. And that, my friends, plain and simply sets the record straight. (article continues here.) Poster Comment: Is this guy an 'evil Nazi baby killer'? 8-p Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Artisan (#0)
Thanks for bringing this to our attention Artisan. Natural news has put out some valid, thought provoking information. But Mike Adams has also stood in defense of scientology. And he is now becoming widely recognized as an adjunct of controlled opposition leader alex "bozo" jones. Those on the rothschild payroll will utilize every smear and tactic imaginable to further their ends. This is just their most recent example. The lines are being drawn.
#2. To: Buzzard (#1)
thanks. I didn't know what 'the holocaust' had anything to do with some MSNBC bimbo who says to kill babies, so Adams references sort of jumped off the page and seemed wildly out of place.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||