[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups

Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners

Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza

AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition

Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report

Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight

Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency

Stealing JFK's Body

Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence

ASHEVILLE UPDATE: Bodies Being Stacked in Warehouses & Children Being Taken Away

American news is mostly written by Israeli lobbyists pushing Zionist agenda

Biden's Missile Crisis

British Operation Kiss kill Instantly Skripals Has Failed to Kill But Succeeded at Covering Up, Almost

NASA chooses SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver rover, astronaut base to the moon

The Female Fantasy Exposed: Why Women Love Toxic Love Stories

United States will NOT comply with the ICC arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu:

Mississippi’s GDP Beats France: A Shocking Look at Economic Policy Failures (Per Capita)

White House Refuses to Recognize US Responsibility for Escalation of Conflict in Ukraine

MAKE EDUCATION GREAT AGAIN!!

They will burn it with a "Peresvet" or shoot it down with a "hypersound"


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: An Open Letter to the Parents of Trayvon Martin
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 6, 2013
Author: Glenda Wells
Post Date: 2013-08-06 00:10:23 by James Deffenbach
Keywords: None
Views: 3256
Comments: 237

Ms Fulton, Mr Martin I mourn your loss more than I can possibly say but let's be clear. Your son had as much opportunity to walk away as Mr Zimmerman did but chose instead to be aggressive himself.

Just as a reminder, Mr Zimmerman did not use Stand Your Ground as a defense. The facts are indisputable that your son was on top and pounding Mr Zimmerman. Your son was not stalked. Mr Zimmerman was judged in a court of law to be not guilty therefore no punishment is warranted.

Your son was depicted by the media as a young boy and portrayed as an innocent but let's be honest. We know that was not a true picture. Instead we learned you're son was a drug dealer and petty thief. Where were you when he should have been learning respect? Where were you when he needed the kind of guidance that would make him a good and decent man?

Your efforts now seem like the desperate reach of parents trying to make up for in death what they failed in life. To think otherwise would paint you as a crass and heartless people looking for personal gain on the grave of a soul lost too soon.

I am the Florida state coordinator for Gun Rights Across America. I represent more than 2,000 law abiding citizens who believe in our God-given right to defend ourselves, our families and our property against the kind of aggression displayed by your son that awful night and by countless thugs and criminals across the nation every day.

GRAA has the support of thousands of members in every state and we have the backing of millions more in hundreds of Patriot and Constitutional groups around the country. We will fight any effort designed to give thugs and criminals power over law abiding citizens.

We have no duty to retreat. We will not run and hide.

We are many. We are mighty. And we vote.

Respectfully and with heartfelt sadness.

Glenda Wells
Gun Rights Across America, Florida State Coordinator

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 87.

#2. To: James Deffenbach, 4 (#0)

let's be honest.

This author is not being honest, imo. Although I suspect this to be a Masonic-linked Op to stir up racial conflict, what's considered the reported evidence indicates that Martin (who had committed no "Running Man" crime that night by hurrying through his neighborhood to get home and out of the rain) was on the porch at his own home before the confrontation with Zimmerman. There are no witnesses that Zimmerman was aggressively struck first in the scenario -- just his word. That someone claimed it appeared to them that Zimmerman was being beaten while pinned to the ground doesn't mean they might not be mistaken or lying. Zimmerman's clothing did not look in film footage like he'd been on the wet ground, he requested help to restrain someone who most likely wouldn't even have been moving at that point and he tried to stop that person who had arrived with a flashlight from calling the police for help. That Zimmerman was reportedly in charge of patrolling the area for months and didn't know the names of the streets indicates he may have been motivated more by vigilantism than his safety duties. I think a good case could be made, though, for open carry instead of concealed carry by Neighborhood Watch patrols because that might prevent others being similarly shot by surprise during what was seemingly to them an unarmed fight with a probable stalker.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-08-06   7:30:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: GreyLmist (#2) (Edited)

This author is not being honest, imo. Although I suspect this to be a Masonic-linked Op to stir up racial conflict

With this opening comment you stumble straight into the Land of Crackpottery.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-08-06   15:06:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Jethro Tull (#4)

This author is not being honest, imo. Although I suspect this to be a Masonic-linked Op to stir up racial conflict

With this opening comment you stumble straight into the Land of Crackpottery, thereby rendering anything else you state unworthy of serious debate.

Reference: Post #5 of 4um Title: Raw Video: George Zimmerman reenacts incident for Sanford Police

A number of things about this controversy make no logical sense but there is more checkable evidence to suspect Masonic involvement in a staged Op than there is for the insistent narrative that this happened from an aggressive first-strike against Zimmerman by Martin, for which there are no actual witnesses whatsoever to that in the scenario other than the claims of Zimmerman who killed him. I don't take it for granted that his statements about that must be deemed unquestionable due to Martin not being wounded instead to survive and dispute them himself and don't think it's my perspective there that's unreasonable.

I've seen it asserted in discussions about this that it doesn't matter who struck first in the fight, just that Zimmerman feared for his life -- except that it seems to matter for the purposes of convincing people that it means nothing if Martin was fighting in fear of a stalker; that his killing was completely justifiable (even though he wasn't being pursued because Zimmerman had been alerted to any criminal acts in the area that night) on the grounds that he was imperfect (Zimmerman's imperfections dismissable) and because Zimmerman claims that he was hit first. If that's the type of "reasoning" you consider worthy of serious debate, I can't agree but am not perplexed, then, if you aren't interested in seriously discussing the safety merits of the Open Carry issue for Neighborhood Watch patrollers and those they serve v. Concealed Carry.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-08-06   19:02:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GreyLmist, Jethro Tull (#8)

A number of things about this controversy make no logical sense but there is more checkable evidence to suspect Masonic involvement in a staged Op than there is for the insistent narrative that this happened from an aggressive first-strike against Zimmerman by Martin, for which there are no actual witnesses whatsoever to that in the scenario other than the claims of Zimmerman who killed him.

No actual witnesses whatsoever to that scenario? Say what?

Here's the transcript of John Good's testimony. John Good was the Prosecution's witness btw...

legalinsurrection.com/201...mixed-martial-arts-style/

snip

...the longer the State’s witness was in the stand, the more damage he did to the State’s theory of the case. The continually growing climax was realized at the very end of the testimony, when O’Mara held a copy of Good’s initial statement to then-lead Investigator Chris Serino (a transcript of is provided below):

O’Mara: Just to clarify what was actually talked about with Chris Serino, Investigator Serino, during this, we’re going to call it for the moment the Ground-and-Pound conversation. We have a rule called completeness, so what I want to do is put it in context for you, ask you if this is what you said to Chris Serino. OK?

“Yeah I pretty much heard somebody yelling outside. I wasn’t sure if it was, you know, a fight or something going wrong. So I opened my blinds and I see kind of like a person out there. I didn’t know if it was a dog attack or something. So I open my door. It was a black man with a black hoodie on top of the other, either a white guy or now I found out I think it was a Hispanic guy with a red sweatshirt on the ground yelling out help! And I tried to tell them, get out of here, you know, stop or whatever, and then one guy on top in the black hoodie was pretty much just throwing down blows on the guy kind of MMA-style.”

Is that the context in which that happened?

Good: Yes.

O’Mara: And then Investigator Serino said, a word that I have, and the transcripts may differ, ground, couldn’t figure it, maybe he said Ground-and-Pound, and then you said:

“Yeah, like a Ground-and-Pound on the concrete at this point, so at this point I told him I’m calling 911.”

AND

legalinsurrection.com/201...ideo-of-states-witnesses/

snip

Once again, it was simply not a very good day at all for the prosecution. The primary State witnesses today were Rachel Jeantel, Jenna Lauer, and Selma Mora. The first had her credibility substantively destroyed, the second was powerfully–almost humiliatingly–co-opted by the defense, and the third provided testimony entirely consistent with the defense’s theory of lawful self-defense.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-08-06   19:56:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: scrapper2 (#11)

The issue was who struck first. What you provided does not indicate anywhere that anyone ever witnessed Martin doing that. Good indicated that a fight was already in process before he saw anything. That is a fact in evidence and not Martin-apologetics. Because the "Good guy" claims to have seen Zimmerman being pounded on the ground at the time he looked doesn't mean that the fight couldn't have started with Martin the one being pounded to the ground at first. Establishing what's actually factual or not in this case doesn't seem to be as imporatant to many as a "Saint Zimmerman" narrative. I'd like to think real jurors would be more diligent but, from the recoil tensions witnessed in this case, it looks like the chances of that are slim to none.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-08-06   21:20:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: GreyLmist (#20)

The issue was who struck first

Who struck first has zero to do with the use of necessary force to defend oneself from deadly physical force. To be clearer, let's assume Z struck Martin first. If TM responded by beating Z to the point he feared for his life, Z was within his rights to use necessary force to stop the attack. It's called self defense.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-08-06   23:11:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Jethro Tull (#30)

Who struck first has zero to do with the use of necessary force to defend oneself from deadly physical force.

I don't have a problem agreeing with that.

To be clearer, let's assume Z struck Martin first.

Ok.

If TM responded by beating Z to the point he feared for his life, Z was within his rights to use necessary force to stop the attack. It's called self defense.

I suppose so except that what he described to the police in his reenactment video was not self defense so much as an accidental shooting that he wasn't even aware had happened to hit TM. There are serious oddities after that point and at least one of those examples that could perhaps be considered a criminal attempt to prevent a call to the police for emergency help by the man with a flashlight who couldn't have been sure that Z had already called them, as he claimed, or whether Martin had been shot in self defense/unintentionally or might have been murdered by Z. In addition to that, by Z's own account in the video, he not only did nothing himself to try and help Martin and didn't ask the man if he was able to help Martin or would get help for him, Z bizarrely insisted that he needed help from the man to restrain Martin who was likely not moving. If those examples were in evidence in a case that wasn't this one, wouldn't you think the attempted obstruction of a call to the police for help was at least indicative of reckless disregard for the life of someone who had used no weaponry against him?

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-08-07   6:10:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: GreyLmist (#35)

I suppose so except that what he described to the police in his reenactment video was not self defense so much as an accidental shooting that he wasn't even aware had happened to hit TM.

Never happened. Z expresses surprise TM had died during his first police interview some hours after the incident, but he never once suggested the shooting was accidental.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-08-07   6:56:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#64. To: Jethro Tull (#36)

Me: what he described to the police in his reenactment video was not self defense so much as an accidental shooting that he wasn't even aware had happened to hit TM.

JT Post #36: Never happened. Z expresses surprise TM had died during his first police interview some hours after the incident, but he never once suggested the shooting was accidental.

Raw Video: George Zimmerman reenacts incident for Sanford Police - at 12 minutes 54 seconds, says he didn't think he hit Trayvon when he shot him.

Hannity interview article - transcription | Hannity interview video

5. He didn’t know he’d shot Trayvon

HANNITY: When you think back, there was one report or police report that actually said you didn’t know after you fired, you didn’t think — you thought you missed?

ZIMMERMAN: I didn’t think I hit him, yes.

-------------------------

JT Post #16: BTW, Serino tried to shake Zimmerman up in one of his five, voluntary, lawyer free interviews. He told him that there was a possibility that the fight was caught by a camera. Zimmerman's reaction? He thanked god and hoped that it was true.

Odd how he gave so many lawyer free interviews to the police and on TV too but didn't want to testify in court. Could you please source which interview and where in it those comments were made or an article about it? Am posting these two audio archives for access conveniene:

George Zimmerman’s Statements To Sanford PD [Audio]

Links to all of the available audio files from the Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman case

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-08-08   9:31:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#66. To: GreyLmist (#64)

Odd how he gave so many lawyer free interviews to the police and on TV too but didn't want to testify in court.

Odd? Really? Would you give the police five interviews w/o representation and then take the stand against the advice of your attorney?

A yes or no answer please.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-08-08   9:45:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#75. To: Jethro Tull (#66)

Odd? Really? Would you give the police five interviews w/o representation and then take the stand against the advice of your attorney?

A yes or no answer please.

Q: Would you give the police five interviews w/o representation

A: No

Why do you suppose he gave so many interviews w/o representation? Wanted his case tried in the court of public opinion because he thought that would be a good thing for the country? Good for him? I think his attorney(s) would have advised him not to take the stand even if he hadn't given any interviews because he contradicts himself, among the many other incredulities about this. They might have had to work harder for their fees then...and the public might have questioned whuzzup with all that?...and then they might have stopped bickering enough to give it more scrutiny...and, well, you get the gist -- yes?

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-08-08   11:41:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#77. To: GreyLmist (#75)

Q: Would you give the police five interviews w/o representation

A: No

Well then, if you also wouldn't take the stand, or do the unrepresented interviews, why call Z's decision odd?

You realize O'Mara was w/Z on Hannity, right?

You'd have to ask Zimmerman why he did it, and while you're at it, ask the countless millions of other Americans who surrender their Fifth Amendment rights and do the exact same thing daily.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-08-08   11:53:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#86. To: Jethro Tull (#77)

Q: Would you give the police five interviews w/o representation

A: No

Well then, if you also wouldn't take the stand, or do the unrepresented interviews, why call Z's decision odd?

I'm not going to be able to catch up on this thread today and keep up if I have to split hairs too and unjumble stuff like that. I'm not even seeing how one thing follows the other in your question. I said, "No" - I would not give the police five interviews w/o representation. I didn't say anything about not taking the stand. I call Z's decision odd because that's just the kind of a hairpin I am, see? That was a James Cagney impression, in case you didn't know.

You realize O'Mara was w/Z on Hannity, right?

Yes. I'm just going to reword my sentence here with a bracketed insert for correctness: Odd how he gave so many lawyer free interviews to the police and [even went] on TV too but didn't want to testify in court.

You'd have to ask Zimmerman why he did it, and while you're at it, ask the countless millions of other Americans who surrender their Fifth Amendment rights and do the exact same thing daily.

I'm one person. That's more busywork than I can manage even if I took him off the list. Mark Dice might do it. He likes to roam around and ask the public questions.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-08-08   14:36:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#87. To: GreyLmist (#86)

I didn't say anything about not taking the stand.

So you would take the stand against the advice of your attorney?

Yes or no please.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2013-08-08   14:42:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 87.

#93. To: Jethro Tull (#87)

So you would take the stand against the advice of your attorney?

Yes or no please.

Maybe.

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-08-08 15:16:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 87.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]