[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Texas Flood Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ? Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia 329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive Which Countries Invest In The US The Most? The History of Barbecue ‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher! They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran? "Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination CNN Stunned As Majority Of Americans Back Trump's Mass Deportation Plan

Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Brainteaser: There's an airplane on the runway..
Source: Elsewhere
URL Source: http://www.someplaceelse.com
Published: Dec 1, 2005
Author: I have no idea
Post Date: 2005-12-01 01:10:02 by Jhoffa_
Keywords: Brainteaser:, airplane, runway..
Views: 2205
Comments: 202

Imagine a plane is sat on the beginning of a massive conveyor belt/travelator type arrangement, as wide and as long as a runway, and intends to take off. The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation. There is no wind.

Can the plane take off?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 183.

#101. To: All (#0)

Interestingly, the place I first saw this question posted did not have a answer. Actually, that's part of the reason I posted it... because there was such a debate over it.

IMO, Yes.. The plane will fly.

As markm0722 pointed out above, it's generating thrust.

If you make 100,000lbs of thrust, where does it go? You can't destroy it, that's impossible.

You're not expending it on the runway, because the wheels don't drive. You're not burning it up with friction, either.. as that's not mentioned. Perfect hypotheticals here.

It's obviously going into forward motion. The wheels rotating (forcing the conveyor to match speed) is proof that the plane is indeed moving forward and regardless of what the conveyor is doing.

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-12-02   7:20:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The wheels rotating (forcing the conveyor to match speed) is proof that the plane is indeed moving forward and regardless of what the conveyor is doing.

The wheels rotating (forcing the conveyor to match speed) is proof that the plane is indeed transferring engine thrust to the conveyor belt while the plane remains stationary. Forward movement in a jet on the ground is created by friction between the ground and the tires. Remove that friction and no forward movement.

Again, jet planes DO NOT have rocket engines. High bypass turbofans DO NOT behave like rocket engines.

wbales  posted on  2005-12-02   8:18:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The wheels rotating (forcing the conveyor to match speed) is proof that the plane is indeed transferring engine thrust to the conveyor belt while the plane remains stationary.

No it's not and no it doesn't.

I can't believe I got sucked into this again.

wakeup  posted on  2005-12-02   19:50:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

In the real world a powerful plane would take off after wasting precious fuel and wear & tear countering a conveyor belt some idiot is running in the wrong direction. Steam catapults currently in use seem much more sensible for that task.

This is why I said there isn't enough detail, like are the wheels skidding. It seems clear (to me, anyway) that we are to assume that the tires of the airplane are in perfect contact with convbelt, so once again, no, the plane could not get airborn because an unknown force is causing the conveyer belt to negate any forward motion.

Dakmar  posted on  2005-12-02   20:04:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

This shall be my last post on this subject (for a least 10 minutes).

Of the four aerodynamic forces, two are initially involved in a plane sitting for takeoff: weight and thrust. A high bypass gas turbine does not blast a plane down the runway like a bullet out of a .357 pistol. The pilot throttles and the thrust must overcome the weight of the plane to move the plane forward. As the plane--STARTING out SLOWLY at first--gains speed, lift and drag come into play as the plane approaches take off speed. Then, it is lift which eventually pulls the plane off the ground.

The weight of the plane sits on the tires. As thrust is applied, the weight of the plane is pushed along ON THE TIRES if on a STATIONARY surface. If the surface on which the tires (weight of the plane) sits is moving against the rotation of the tires while perfectly matching the speed of the tires, the plane cannot and shall not move. Intial momentum could NEVER be reached to make the plane move. Therefore, it could NEVER reach take off (lift) speed.

Again, high bypass gas turbines are NOT rocket engines.

wbales  posted on  2005-12-02   22:19:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You need to watch the fan on the skateboard movie I posted earlier. I don't know why you are so hung up on the type of engine. It either supplies thrust or it does not.

The axle the wheels are mounted on is designed to be as frictionless as possible. How is a frictionless device going to counter the forward thrust?

markm0722  posted on  2005-12-02   22:43:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Bogus. The fan driven skateboard: 1) is moving (gains momentum) before the paper is pulled out from under it; 2) the speed of the paper and the skateboard wheels is not the same and uniform; and, 3) its weight is transferred to the stationary floor under the paper.

wbales  posted on  2005-12-02   22:51:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Mom I love you

Esso  posted on  2005-12-02   23:14:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#184. To: Esso (#183)

What does this have to do with this thread?

RickyJ  posted on  2005-12-02 23:20:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]