[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout) How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold) This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’ LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay Not much going on that I can find today In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?! Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort? Israelis Persecute Americans Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute ICE agents pull screaming illegal immigrant influencer from car after resisting arrest Aaron Lewis on Being Blacklisted & Why Record Labels Promote Terrible Music Connecticut Democratic Party Holds Presser To Cry About Libs of TikTok Trump wants concealed carry in DC. Chinese 108m Steel Bridge Collapses in 3s, 16 Workers Fall 130m into Yellow River COVID-19 mRNA-Induced TURBO CANCERS. Think Tank Urges Dems To Drop These 45 Terms That Turn Off Normies

Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: Brainteaser: There's an airplane on the runway..
Source: Elsewhere
URL Source: http://www.someplaceelse.com
Published: Dec 1, 2005
Author: I have no idea
Post Date: 2005-12-01 01:10:02 by Jhoffa_
Keywords: Brainteaser:, airplane, runway..
Views: 2989
Comments: 202

Imagine a plane is sat on the beginning of a massive conveyor belt/travelator type arrangement, as wide and as long as a runway, and intends to take off. The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation. There is no wind.

Can the plane take off?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.

#2. To: Jhoffa_ (#0)

No.

The plane much reach takeoff "air speed", a certain speed of air flowing over the wings at which lift is generated by the wings. The plane must move forward, relative to the air flow over the wings. Merely rotating the wheels via the conveyer while the plane is otherwise motionless relative to the air won't get it done.

Now, a wind tunnel instead of a conveyor....

Starwind  posted on  2005-12-01   1:16:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

True.. can I change my answer ?? :P

Zipporah  posted on  2005-12-01   1:19:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Are you sure you want to?

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-12-01   1:21:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Are you sure you want to?

LOL! I was wrong.

The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation.

That is another way to say, the conveyor moves forward at the exact same speed of the plane, but the wheels never actually rotate.

So the plane would gather speed, the conveyor keeps pace, the wheels never rotate, lift is produced as the air flows over the wings, plane takes off.

See, Zipporah, you were right the first time :)

Starwind  posted on  2005-12-01   1:41:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

"That is another way to say, the conveyor moves forward at the exact same speed of the plane, but the wheels never actually rotate."

I believe you misunderstand the question.

"The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation."

The wheels roll or "rotate" forward as the conveyer belt moves the "opposite direction."

Try to imagine God holding the plane from moving forward and someone turns on the conveyer belt. The wheels spin, the conveyer belt moves along in the opposite direction yet, the plane is stationary. Now, God lets go and the plane, which was at full throttle, starts to push against the air and begins to move forward. It is irrelevant what the tires or the conveyer belt are doing.

wakeup  posted on  2005-12-01   2:34:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The wheels roll or "rotate" forward as the conveyer belt moves the "opposite direction."

That's actually a physical impossibility, or at least it would indicate the wheels skidding on the conveyer. The plane moves forward (under its thrust, weight resting on the wheels), but no, the wheels don't rotate because the forward motion of the conveyer (keeping pace with the accelerating plane) negates their rotation.

The wheels can't be in physical contact with the conveyor moving forward while the wheels also rotate opposite - two objects in contact moving in opposite directions with shear forces - the wheels would be "peeling out" like a drag racer. But the wheels aren't driven and they don't need to rotate, since the conveyor is pacing the plane's velocity.

It is irrelevant what the tires or the conveyer belt are doing.

From a standpoint of the plane developing lift on its own, yes. The wheels and conveyer were a "red herring". I missed it earlier.

Starwind  posted on  2005-12-01   2:50:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

"the wheels don't rotate because the forward motion of the conveyer (keeping pace with the accelerating plane) negates their rotation."

Read this again. "The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation."

Note that the conveyer belt matches the speed of the wheels, NOT THE PLANE. The wheels roll forward and the conveyer belt moves the opposite directions. No friction, imagine a bike on a treadmill. Tires rolling one way... forward, and the treadmill going the other. Perfectly logical.

Obviously, the question was designed to make you think the plane would spin it's tires in place and go nowhere, like a car on the conveyer belt would do. Cars push against the ground, planes push against the air.

The answer would be too obvious if the conveyer belt moved along with the plane.

wakeup  posted on  2005-12-01   3:04:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#30. To: wakeup (#27)

Note that the conveyer belt matches the speed of the wheels, NOT THE PLANE

The wheels have two speeds in this. A rotational speed which if in contact with the conveyor belt, must be matched and a translational velocity as the plane to which they are attached moves forward.

And there are two directions. The rotational direction of the wheels at the tangential point of contact with the conveyeor (bottom of tire rotates rearward ), in which case the opposite direction of the conveyor would be forward, and consequently shear forces and 'skiding' would exist, if the wheels were driven (but they're not); and the other direction is the translational direction of the wheels (and the plane) - forward, in which case the opposite direction of the conveyor would be rearward.

I 'overanalyzed and overempahsized' the rotational aspects.

The answer would be too obvious if the conveyer belt moved along with the plane.

Oh, idunno, it made a fine red herring as-is, for me anyway :)

Starwind  posted on  2005-12-01 03:31:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]