[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!


Health
See other Health Articles

Title: Kidney Transplants Linked to Invasive Skin Cancer
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 6, 2013
Author: Fran Lowry
Post Date: 2013-09-06 03:21:40 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 95
Comments: 5

Medscape: Patients who receive organ transplants appear to be at increased risk for squamous cell carcinoma.

In a brief report published in the September 3 issue of in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, Laurence Verneuil, MD, and colleagues from INSERM, University of Caen, France, give an explanation for this increased risk.

The report provides "the first evidence for donor contribution to the malignant epithelium of skin squamous cell carcinoma in a kidney transplant recipient," write Cai Bin Cui, MD, and David A. Berber, MD, from the School of Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in an accompanying commentary.

Tumor cells with donor genotype have previously been identified in human skin cancer after allogeneic transplantation, but it is unclear if donor tissue contributes to this cancer formation, Dr. Verneuil and his team write.

In 21 skin squamous cell carcinomas from kidney transplant recipients, the researchers examined p53 expression, which is found in squamous cell carcinomas, and TP53 mutations, which are found in tumor cells.

In 1 patient, they identified skin tumor cells that were the same genotype as the donated kidney and contained a mutation in a known cancer-causing gene. Cells with this mutation were present in kidney biopsy samples taken at the time of transplantation.

Important Implications for Cancer Research

This case study has implications for cancer research and the clinical care of transplant recipients, the editorialists explain.

"Cancer, especially skin squamous cell carcinoma, is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in long-surviving kidney transplant recipients. Future research should address what can be done to reduce/prevent de novo malignancy and donor-associated malignancy in kidney transplant recipients," they write.

They also wonder if the findings from this report warrant inclusion of a cancer risk genetic test as part of transplant recipient and/or donor organ screening.

"Genetic factors are increasingly recognized to play important roles in tumorigenesis," they note. "Furthermore, genetic cancer risk screening of transplant recipients is potentially reasonable, since the cost and turnaround time for genetic testing is rapidly improving."

Currently, donor organ screening does not include genetic testing for cancer risk mutations, the editorialists point out.

The likelihood of such testing on donor organs "is remote at this point due to the extremely low prevalence of donor-associated malignancy, the long turnaround time, the high cost associated with the genetic tests, and the ever-increasing clinical shortage of donor organs," they write.

They conclude that the increase in long-term survival for transplant recipients and the knowledge of germline mutations and their association with cancer "brings us to a new clinical decision point."

"While the majority of post-transplant malignancies are likely to remain a de novo malignancy, we may be at the beginning of a time when we can risk assess the possibility of donor-associated malignancy development in a transplant recipient," they write.

Dr. Verneuil, Dr. Cui, and Dr. Gerber have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

"Patients who receive organ transplants appear to be at increased risk for squamous cell carcinoma."

It's me again, resident transplant poster! :-)

Yes on the squamous cell carcinomas. Had one removed (non-malignant) at about 3 years post transplant. Now at near 6 yrs. post I'm being treated for 'pre- cancerous' spots at two places.

I'm led to believe by my doctors that this is a result of both the immune suppressants and the prednisone I take.

"If we don’t adhere to the Constitution on matters as significant as presidential eligibility, then the Constitution ceases to be a meaningful document for guiding our nation."

ndcorup  posted on  2013-09-06   7:35:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: ndcorup (#1)

They wouldn't be taking organs for transplant from cancer victims?

Tatarewicz  posted on  2013-09-06   23:27:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tatarewicz (#2)

"They wouldn't be taking organs for transplant from cancer victims?"

That's one issue that was repeatedly expressed to my wife and me; that the donor liver would be thoroughly screened for ANY indicators of cancer both pre- and post mortum (sp?).

Vanderbilt stated that it was possible to hit a delay in the transplant if Anything was suspicious. They jealously guard their success rate.

On a 1500+ Waiting List, I was entered at #3. I still waited about 2 months for my transplant. The donor was a 22 y.o. car accident victim. Vanderbilt would only use certain organs from Life Support donors.

"If we don’t adhere to the Constitution on matters as significant as presidential eligibility, then the Constitution ceases to be a meaningful document for guiding our nation."

ndcorup  posted on  2013-09-07   6:13:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: ndcorup (#3)

Vanderbuilt Docs nor organ agency probably didn't check donor's family for cancer history or for predisposition for it in DNA. Until we can grow our own non-rejectable spare organs transplants will remain problematic. I can only pass on George Noory's advice to look into adding bitter melon to your diet and wish you well in dealing with the complication.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2013-09-08   3:52:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Tatarewicz (#4)

" advice to look into adding bitter melon to your diet and wish you well in dealing with the complication."

The old saying; "Sure Beats the Alternative!" seems to be my mindset. :-)

Very encouraging is that my Doctors (V.A.) are aggressively monitoring every aspect of my medical adventures, for the rest of my life!

Then, I'm committed to be autopsied for further education! :-) What a Deal!!!!!!!!!

"If we don’t adhere to the Constitution on matters as significant as presidential eligibility, then the Constitution ceases to be a meaningful document for guiding our nation."

ndcorup  posted on  2013-09-08   8:12:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]