Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: NEW INTERVIEW : JIM TRAFICANT - FRAMED (by AIPAC)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 20, 2012
Author: Kerry Cassidy JIM TRAFICANT
Post Date: 2013-10-25 06:03:18 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 146
Comments: 9

I met the former U.S. Congressman Jim Traficant at the June Conspiracy Con conference where we were both speaking. His story is fascinating and revealing not only because it demonstrates the role and the power of the Israel lobby in America but because as a Congressman he acted with the courage of his convictions. A rare thing indeed.

Framed, and imprisoned in the U.S. for a crime he did not commit for nearly eight years, he is now a free man and he is talking. This man is a true White Hat and a real American patriot standing up for what is right.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)

Great interview - thanks.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2013-10-25   11:42:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Itistoolate, 4 (#0)

Ron Paul: "When Mr. Traficant gets an opportunity to defend himself, he gets 30 minutes? Really?" - 3.5 minutes

The Motion was a vote to postpone the expulsion of Traficant. Paul claimed that while on the surface it seems that Jim was guilty that there were many irregularities in the Trial.? Furthermore he only gets 30 Minutes (?!?) to defend himself over hundreds of Documents?!?

Ron Paul supported a motion to postpone the expulsion.

Donahue - James Traficant Part 1 Oct 8 1990 - 14.5 minutes

IT'S INCREDIBLE HOW RELATIVE THIS IS TODAY AS OPPOSED TO 21 YEARS AGO [Traficant on Government Shutdown then]

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2013-10-25   21:19:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GreyLmist (#2)

Thank God that he refused any meds in prison.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2013-10-25   21:25:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: GreyLmist, Lod (#2)

EASIER TO FIND ELVIS THAN A GOOD FACTORY JOB HERE IN AMERICA November 12, 1997

Mr. Speaker, Kodak is laying off 10,000 workers. Now if that is not enough to overexpose your most recent negative, Fruit of the Loom is cutting 3,000 jobs and moving to Mexico. Unbelievable. It is getting easier to find Charlie Trie and Elvis than it is to find a good factory job here in America.

Beam me up. I think it is time for Congress to ask themselves a very simple little commonsense question: If our trade program is so great, why does Japan not do it? Think about that.

I yield back all the balance of jobs and say one last thing here. From snapshots to long johns, American workers just keep getting their assets kicked.

Itistoolate  posted on  2013-10-25   21:47:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Itistoolate (#4)

Beam me up, bump

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2013-10-25   21:52:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Lod (#5)

I think this is what they got him 'for' NOT 'on':

Before the following Bill by Traficant you were REQUIRED to PROVE 'your' innocence.

After the Bill the "Burden of Proof" was on the IRS.

February 25, 1998

TRAFICANT BILL PROTECTS TAXPAYERS

 FROM UNWARRANTED IRS SEIZURES

Washington, D.C. – For more than a decade, U.S. Rep. James A. Traficant, Jr. (D–OH) has been working in Congress to reform the Internal Revenue Service and protect taxpayers from IRS abuses.  Today, Traficant continued his crusade by introducing legislation to prevent unwarranted IRS seizures.   Traficant announced that the chairman of the tax writing House Ways and Means Committee, U.S. Rep. Bill Archer (R–TX), made a commitment today to Traficant that he would work to have Traficant's seizure bill included in the final version of the IRS reform bill working its way through Congress.

 Traficant's bill requires the IRS to get judicial consent prior to seizing any taxpayer property.  The bill also mandates that the IRS provide a 15-day notice before seizing any property.  Finally, the measure allows taxpayers to exclude from their gross income calculation any damages they are awarded in a federal court proceeding related to IRS misconduct.

 A number of Traficant-authored IRS reform initiatives have been enacted into law in recent years.  These include a mandatory taxpayer sensitivity training program for IRS agents, a provision to make it easier for taxpayers to sue the IRS for willful misconduct, and increasing the penalty for IRS agent misconduct from $100,000 to $1 million.  Last fall, the House-passed IRS reform bill included a major Traficant-sponsored provision to shift the burden of proof in civil tax cases from a taxpayer to the IRS.

 The House passed an IRS reform bill last fall.  The Senate is expected to pass a similar bill later this year.  Any differences between the two bills would have to be ironed out in a House-Senate conference committee.  Traficant received a commitment today from Chairman Archer that Archer would work in conference to have the Traficant seizure bill included in the final version of the IRS reform legislation.  Archer also assured Traficant that he would work in conference to ensure that Traficant's
"burden of proof" language remains in the bill.2009

Itistoolate  posted on  2013-10-25   21:59:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Itistoolate (#6)

As he mentioned, the irs wanted to nail his ass also.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2013-10-25   22:16:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Itistoolate (#6)

After the Bill the "Burden of Proof" was on the IRS.

This is the way it should be in America. The "burden of proof" should always be on the prosecution, which is the government. Everywhere but in Louisiana, which derives its law from France, where you must prove your innocence before you can be acquitted. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2013-10-26   12:35:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: GreyLmist (#2)

They would shoot the Donohue Show in Chicago regularly, I knew a girl that worked in a restaurant in the north suburbs. She told me that Donohue would walk in and look around waiting for someone to recognize him. It didn't always work out that way. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2013-10-26   12:54:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest