See other Editorial Articles
Title: LAX shooter DUMMY proof of Hoax
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 2, 2013
Author: crisisactors
Post Date: 2013-11-02 21:03:32 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 2185
Comments: 65
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.
#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)
Eyewitnesses said the shooter had a blue shirt on with dark blond hair. This guy has no blue shirt on and doesn't have dark blond hair.
blue shirt dummy is in the video
If the guy in that fake-looking nypost.com pic is supposed to be the shooter, he isn't wearing a blue shirt. Seems the objective is to traumatize the public psyche and get away with it by claiming it's news, never mind the details. That twisted MKULTRA-type M.O. is recurrent in disaster and war "reporting" and also some so-called "art".
Uhhhhhhhh...... (All encompassing comment)
(All encompassing comment) Complicated stuff, eh?
Well, uhhh, ahhh, err, difficult to spin thin air into whole cloth. It wont hold water.
Me: #9 | Cynicom: #10 | wudidiz: #12 | Cynicom: #13 I don't know what you mean by "All encompassing comment" and "difficult to spin thin air into whole cloth. It wont hold water", Cynicom. You disagree that there's any MKULTRA-type M.O. and objective to traumatize the public's psyche with false imagery/false news and get away with it that's recurrent in disaster and war "reporting" and also some so-called "art"?
Quite a mouthful.
Grey knows full well of my limited vocabulary, thus he is able send me to the dictionary. I read his posts.
I read Fixed for proper pronouns and thanks for reading. :) I read yours too and, while I disagree at times, I have learned much appreciatively from your perspectives. You shouldn't have to go to the dictionary over my statements at #9 and inquiry at #15, Cyni. Just clarify more specifically, please -- for my understanding -- what you meant by your posts at #10 and #13.
#22. To: All (#21)
(Edited)
History refresher video, 3.25 minutes: CIA Admits PrePackaged News Reports {1975} Edited to include video-timespan.
What???? Good heavens. I have always been partial to ladies. If not for my age, I would get new glasses. Now I feel bad At least I have always considered Grey as being a "YOUNG" person. No fault can be found with that. (I hope) From now on you shall have my utmost respect as a lady. No more tweeking your nose, that would not be nice.
Grey... Going way back in time, many years. Whenever Christine (a lady) posted something that I considered to be valueless, for whatever reason, I would post only, Uhhhh, without comment. She did not threaten me with bodily harm, so I continued it as a harmless gesture by an olde man.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: RickyJ (#1)
#9. To: Itistoolate (#2)
#10. To: GreyLmist (#9)
#12. To: Cynicom (#10)
Uhhhhhhhh......
#13. To: wudidiz (#12)
Complicated stuff, eh?
#15. To: Cynicom (#13)
#17. To: GreyLmist (#15)
You disagree that there's any MKULTRA-type M.O. and objective to traumatize the public's psyche with false imagery/false news and get away with it that's recurrent in disaster and war "reporting" and also some so-called "art"?
#19. To: scrapper2 (#17)
Quite a mouthful.
#21. To: Cynicom (#19)
Grey knows full well of my limited vocabulary, thus
he she is able send me to the dictionary. his her posts.
Replies to Comment # 21.
#24. To: GreyLmist (#21)
I read his her posts.
#25. To: GreyLmist (#21)
#10 and #13.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.