See other Editorial Articles
Title: LAX shooter DUMMY proof of Hoax
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 2, 2013
Author: crisisactors
Post Date: 2013-11-02 21:03:32 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 1000
Comments: 65
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 51.
#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)
Eyewitnesses said the shooter had a blue shirt on with dark blond hair. This guy has no blue shirt on and doesn't have dark blond hair.
blue shirt dummy is in the video
If the guy in that fake-looking nypost.com pic is supposed to be the shooter, he isn't wearing a blue shirt. Seems the objective is to traumatize the public psyche and get away with it by claiming it's news, never mind the details. That twisted MKULTRA-type M.O. is recurrent in disaster and war "reporting" and also some so-called "art".
Uhhhhhhhh...... (All encompassing comment)
(All encompassing comment) Complicated stuff, eh?
Well, uhhh, ahhh, err, difficult to spin thin air into whole cloth. It wont hold water.
Me: #9 | Cynicom: #10 | wudidiz: #12 | Cynicom: #13 I don't know what you mean by "All encompassing comment" and "difficult to spin thin air into whole cloth. It wont hold water", Cynicom. You disagree that there's any MKULTRA-type M.O. and objective to traumatize the public's psyche with false imagery/false news and get away with it that's recurrent in disaster and war "reporting" and also some so-called "art"?
Quite a mouthful.
Grey knows full well of my limited vocabulary, thus he is able send me to the dictionary. I read his posts.
I read Fixed for proper pronouns and thanks for reading. :) I read yours too and, while I disagree at times, I have learned much appreciatively from your perspectives. You shouldn't have to go to the dictionary over my statements at #9 and inquiry at #15, Cyni. Just clarify more specifically, please -- for my understanding -- what you meant by your posts at #10 and #13.
What???? Good heavens. I have always been partial to ladies. If not for my age, I would get new glasses. Now I feel bad At least I have always considered Grey as being a "YOUNG" person. No fault can be found with that. (I hope) From now on you shall have my utmost respect as a lady. No more tweeking your nose, that would not be nice.
Am not a "YOUNG" person and it's ok by me if you tweek my nose. Thanks for clarifying at #25 that you thought my post at #9 was valueless. I owe ya a nose-tweek for that sometime. :) Edited last sentence.
Well, I have to confess. There was more to my profile of Grey... Male, young, often misled, very intelligent. I am going back to gender/personality/intelligence class 101...
There was more to my profile of Grey... Male, young, often misled, very intelligent. I am going back to gender/personality/intelligence class 101... Had to smile at the last part of that profile, thinking of all the differences of opinion there undoubtedly are about that. I'd dispute it myself if I didn't have to get busy soon on other things. Suffice it to say that I'm still perplexed, for instance, how it is that the moon acts like a sunlight magnet instead of there being light beaming visibly all around it when you look up at it, as there would be if you held a Tootsie Roll Pop behind a lit light bulb. It's a mystery to me. I don't think you really need that 101 class. All you needed to do was click on my screen name link and the Home Page Profile there would have told ya: Constitutionalist female. But not my age. :)
Grey.. Two things I never do, I never Bozo anyone, two I never read anyones profiles. Two things I do. One read everyone, two, I have mental lists of most of the posters here. Intelligence/brains/honesty, is the most important list. Been thrown out of every forum in 15 years except this one. Christine pays me to post here. If you waste time reading my posts, you find I lie a lot, just to see if anyone is paying attention.
Why? Am not implying that your posts are valueless by that question. Just wondering where I am, I guess. Is this still Freedom4um or a Cynicom Charity Center or what? So, were you lying about being a paid poster or not?
Good heavens... I am crushed. My veracity being questioned. I am an admitted nose tweeker and occasional truth stretcher.
I am crushed. My veracity being questioned. I am an admitted nose tweeker and occasional truth stretcher. I have gotten the impression of truth stretching when reading your Ron Paul posts, which is a different topic that I'll try to discuss with you at another thread. Was stating that you are a paid poster simply a nose tweek (joking around as if you're 4um's staff version of the Siskel and Ebert Show to critique our postings here) or something more serious like a Cyni-Cybercom/Postman.guv Enterprise announcement?
Nope, not guilty on posts about Ron Paul. After the Trotsky thing, I did a lot of research on olde Ron. A lot. As time passed, I came to the realization that as a Cynic, I had been swindled. My downfall was in wanting and hoping for someone to step forward, to lead the masses of this country, to stop this downward spiral into war and or chaos. Not enough attention was paid to minute details, details that when added up were in fact warning signs. It is dangerous to ever accept any politician in total. I was careless, overlooked details. With the Trotsky memo, I jumped ship, no more money, no support and a lot of time putting bits and pieces together. This was my personal conclusion, Ron Paul had at no time been running for president. In 2012, that conclusion was set in cement.
Not one person in congress is trustworthy. Not even one!
Not even one! You get an A+ for 100% accuracy !
.
#52. To: wudidiz (#51)
I wonder if he ever bumped his head ? Awesome balance !
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: RickyJ (#1)
#9. To: Itistoolate (#2)
#10. To: GreyLmist (#9)
#12. To: Cynicom (#10)
Uhhhhhhhh......
#13. To: wudidiz (#12)
Complicated stuff, eh?
#15. To: Cynicom (#13)
#17. To: GreyLmist (#15)
You disagree that there's any MKULTRA-type M.O. and objective to traumatize the public's psyche with false imagery/false news and get away with it that's recurrent in disaster and war "reporting" and also some so-called "art"?
#19. To: scrapper2 (#17)
Quite a mouthful.
#21. To: Cynicom (#19)
Grey knows full well of my limited vocabulary, thus
he she is able send me to the dictionary. his her posts.
#24. To: GreyLmist (#21)
I read his her posts.
#27. To: Cynicom (#24)
(Edited)
#28. To: GreyLmist (#27)
#33. To: Cynicom (#28)
Well, I have to confess.
#39. To: GreyLmist (#33)
#42. To: Cynicom (#39)
Christine pays me to post here.
If you waste time reading my posts, you find I lie a lot, just to see if anyone is paying attention.
#44. To: GreyLmist (#42)
So, were you lying about being a paid poster or not?
#45. To: Cynicom (#44)
Good heavens...
#46. To: GreyLmist (#45)
I have gotten the impression of truth stretching when reading your Ron Paul posts,
#48. To: Cynicom (#46)
#50. To: titorite (#48)
Not one person in congress is trustworthy.
#51. To: noone222, titorite, Cynicom, GreyLmist, christine, titorite, all (#50)
Replies to Comment # 51.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 51.