[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

WHY SO MANY FOREIGN BASES IN AFRICA?

Trump called Candace Owens about Brigitte Macron's P*NIS?

New Mexico Is The Most-Dependent State On The Federal Govt, New Jersey The Least

"This Is The Next Level": AI-Powered "Digital Workers" Deployed At Major Bank To Work Alongside Humans

Cash Jordan: ICE Raids Taco Trucks... Deports 'Entire Parking Lot' of Migrants

Jaguar Went Woke & The Results Were Catastrophic

Trump Threatens To DEPORT ELON MUSK Over Big Beautiful Bill Feud, Elon NEVER Wanted EV Mandates

If Trump Cared About Israel, He would Stop the Genocide

Why do you think Henry Ford was such a hardcore Antisemite?

In Case you miss Bad Journalism

Bobby K Jr was Exiled For Saying This:

Quantum Meets AI: Morgan Stanley Maps Out Next Tech Frontier

670,000+ Swept Away as Dams Burst in Canton China, Triggering Deadly Flood!

Senate Version Of Trump Tax Bill Adds $3.3 Trillion To Deficit, $500BN More Than The House; Debt Ceiling Raised By $5 Trillion

Iran Disables GPS, Joins China’s Beidou — The End of U.S. Satellite Dominance?

Ukraine's Withdrawal From Anti-Personnel Landmine Treaty Could Haunt Generations

71 killed in Israeli attack on Iran's Evin Prison

Practice Small, Daily Acts Of Sabotage Against The Imperial Machine

"EVERYONE'S BEEN SHOT UP HERE": Arsonists Set Wildfire In Northern Idaho, Open Fire On Firefighters, Police In Ambush

Trump has Putin trapped, and the Kremlin knows it

Kamala's comeback bid sparks Democrat donor meltdown amid fears she'll sink party in California

Russia's New Grom-A1 100 KM Range Guided Bomb- 600 Kilo

UKRAINIAN CONSULATE IN ITALY CAUGHT TRAFFICKING WEAPONS, ORGANS & CHILDREN WITH THE MAFIA

Andrew Cuomo to stay on ballot for NYC mayor in November general election

The life of the half-immortal who advised CCP (End of CCP in 2026?)

Millions Flee China’s Top Cities

Violence begets violence: IDF troops beaten, choked, rammed by Jewish settlers in West Bank

Netanyahu Says It's Antisemitic For Israeli Soldiers To Describe Their Own Atrocities

China's Economy Spirals With No End In Sight, Says Kyle Bass

American Bread Cannot Be Sold in Most Countries


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: China to ease one-child policy
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 15, 2013
Author: staff
Post Date: 2013-11-15 23:16:57 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 269
Comments: 9

BEIJING, Nov. 15 (Xinhua) -- China will loosen its decades-long one-child population policy, allowing couples to have two children if one of them is an only child, according to a key decision issued on Friday by the Communist Party of China (CPC).

China will implement this new policy while adhering to the basic state policy of family planning, according to the decision on major issues concerning comprehensively deepening reforms, which was approved at the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee held from Nov. 9 to 12 in Beijing.

The birth policy will be adjusted and improved step by step to promote "long-term balanced development of the population in China," it said.

Relaxing the policy will keep China's birth rate at a stable level, said Guo Zhenwei, a family-planning official with the National Health and Family Planning Commission.

To ensure coordinated economic and social development, the population size for China should be kept at about 1.5 billion, said Guo, citing the results of a study sponsored by the State Council, China's cabinet.

China should keep its total fertility rate at around 1.8, and the current rate is between 1.5 to 1.6, allowing the country to maneuver its population policy, according to Guo.

Wu Cangping, an adviser with the China Population Association, believed the change in China's family planning policy will unlikely lead to a baby boom because of Chinese parents' traditional preference for more children has changed due to rapid social progress in the country.

The change in policy was met with a warm response.

Many Internet users welcomed the change while others said they would have a second thought when giving birth to a second child because of high living costs.

An Internet user identified herself as "Hikaruhuang" hailed the reform as "very good." She said her child would have a companion and less pressure in elder care.

China's family planning policy was first introduced in the late 1970s to rein in the surging population by limiting most urban couples to one child and most rural couples to two children, if the first child born was a girl.

One-child families are entitled to bonuses and other benefits. Official statistics show such families account for 37.5 percent of China's more than 1.3 billion population.

The policy was later relaxed, with its current form stipulating that both parents must be only children if they are to have a second child.

Since its implementation, it is estimated the policy has resulted in a reduction of some 400 million people in China.

However, the policy has also been blamed for generating a number of social problems.

China's labor force, at about 940 million, decreased by 3.45 million year on year in 2012, marking the first "absolute decrease." The labor force is estimated to decrease by about 29 million over the current decade.

Meanwhile, the country's growing elderly population aged 60 and over, which accounted for 14.3 percent of the total currently, is forecast to exceed one third of the population in 2050.

Gender imbalance is another side effect of the one-child policy. Chinese parents' preference for sons led to the abortion of female foetuses due to the policy.

About 118 boys are born for every 100 girls in 2012, higher than the normal ratio of 103 to 107 boys for every 100 girls. Millions of Chinese men will be unable to find wives in 2030.

Economists say the one-child policy is also a cause for the high savings rate among Chinese people.

"The change in the family planning policy will certainly affect China's one-child generation -- some of whom have already become parents. It will help them enjoy a better future," wrote an Internet user called herself "shanma123."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)

its so disgusting that any goveernment would have the gall to dictate to humans how many kids theyre "allowed" to have. and here we're told that the ussa opposes 'despots'.

Artisan  posted on  2013-11-16   2:52:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Artisan (#1)

The government is us.

Why should other Chinese be expected to pay for people's children outside the replacement number?

Gall? Really?

Gall is people thinking they can have 5 kids when they can only afford to support ONE.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-11-16   3:00:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: scrapper2 (#2)

why do you equate government 'paying for people's children' with government authority to dictate how many children people can have?

eugenecists aren't controlling the number of kids people have so that the government wont have to pay for them.

the welfare state or lack thereof is a separate issue than forced population control.

if you are for limited government, then there is no rational way you could argue that government could ever have valid authority to control something so personal. Only an evil despot (such as the red Chinese commies) would ever dream of controlling people's reproductive rights.

Artisan  posted on  2013-11-16   22:29:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Artisan (#3)

China's mean education is 7.5 years.

Try selling 2 children replacement value on rural uneducated rural Chinese.

Btw, the 1 child policy was implemented for economic reasons, not due to eugenics.

It had a rational reason and purpose.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-11-17   0:39:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 4.

#5. To: scrapper2 (#4)

I thought you were Catholic?

If so, you should certainly know the evils of communism and how many millions of innocent people they have slaughtered.

and also, the blatant evil of such a policy to have a government infringe on the very most basic rights and dignities of human beings. the right of procreation.

bush sr., planned parenthood, the entire nwo gang, all love and promoted this power to control populations. it can never be excused or justified.

It had a rational reason and purpose

Anything that goes against the law of God is by its very nature irrational because God is the author of rationality and righteousness. Since the purpose of the procreative act is to procreate, anything that thwarts that unnaturally is by definition an evil purpose.

the serious societal problems china has now, including kidnapping of women, are some results of this evil policy.

Artisan  posted on  2013-11-17 17:57:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]