Status: Not Logged In; Sign In ReligionSee other Religion ArticlesTitle: Exactly When Was Jesus Born? Not on December 25. Source: Foodforthethinkers.com URL Source: http://wp.me/p13mHb-i1 Published: Dec 24, 2013 Author: Douglas F. Newman Post Date: 2013-12-24 22:24:43 by snoopdougg Keywords: NoneViews: 2711 Comments: 31 Jesus was not born on December 25. More likely, he was born in September. Full article here: wp.me/p13mHb-i1Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4. #4. To: snoopdougg (#0) More likely, he was born in September. About 20 or so years ago I had it all laid out on paper. The date fell somewhere between (on our calendar) late September to October 3rd. It had to do with Mary's conception in relation to the birth of John the Baptist and John's father (a Levite) schedule for serving in the temple. Others have suggested early April for similar reasons as that would equate to the alternate period when John's father would have had temple duties. Buzzard posted on 2013-12-24 23:40:21 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 4. There are no replies to Comment # 4. End Trace Mode for Comment # 4. Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
ReligionSee other Religion Articles
Title: Exactly When Was Jesus Born? Not on December 25. Source: Foodforthethinkers.com URL Source: http://wp.me/p13mHb-i1 Published: Dec 24, 2013 Author: Douglas F. Newman Post Date: 2013-12-24 22:24:43 by snoopdougg Keywords: NoneViews: 2711 Comments: 31
Jesus was not born on December 25. More likely, he was born in September. Full article here: wp.me/p13mHb-i1
More likely, he was born in September.
Full article here: wp.me/p13mHb-i1
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#4. To: snoopdougg (#0) More likely, he was born in September. About 20 or so years ago I had it all laid out on paper. The date fell somewhere between (on our calendar) late September to October 3rd. It had to do with Mary's conception in relation to the birth of John the Baptist and John's father (a Levite) schedule for serving in the temple. Others have suggested early April for similar reasons as that would equate to the alternate period when John's father would have had temple duties. Buzzard posted on 2013-12-24 23:40:21 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 4. There are no replies to Comment # 4. End Trace Mode for Comment # 4. Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
More likely, he was born in September. About 20 or so years ago I had it all laid out on paper. The date fell somewhere between (on our calendar) late September to October 3rd. It had to do with Mary's conception in relation to the birth of John the Baptist and John's father (a Levite) schedule for serving in the temple. Others have suggested early April for similar reasons as that would equate to the alternate period when John's father would have had temple duties.
About 20 or so years ago I had it all laid out on paper. The date fell somewhere between (on our calendar) late September to October 3rd.
It had to do with Mary's conception in relation to the birth of John the Baptist and John's father (a Levite) schedule for serving in the temple.
Others have suggested early April for similar reasons as that would equate to the alternate period when John's father would have had temple duties.
Buzzard posted on 2013-12-24 23:40:21 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There are no replies to Comment # 4.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest