[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
National News See other National News Articles Title: Americans React To End Of Jobless Benefits: “I Just Don’t Know What To Do, Except Pray” "It's going to put my family and me out on the streets," is a perspective shared by many of the 1.3 million Americans about to lose their emergency unemployment claims. The program, started during the recession, was intended to help jobless people after they exhausted state benefits, typically lasting six months. House Republicans resisted continuing the benefits without budget cuts elsewhere to cover the cost. As Bloomberg reports, opponents say the extended benefits discourage the unemployed from accepting jobs and that the program should be curtailed, given the recovery in the nation’s labor market. Via Bloomberg, “It lacks compassion for the victims of the recession and, economically, it’s shooting ourselves in the foot,” said Lawrence Mishel, the president of the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, which backs policies that help low-income workers. “The timing is very premature. The evidence is that people who want work can’t find it.” ... “The economy has now been out of a recession for more than four years,” said Chris Edwards, an economist with the Cato Institute in Washington, which argues for scaling back the role of government. “These unemployment benefits are emergency benefits, but the economy is no longer in an emergency situation. People can find jobs if they are willing to moderate their wage demands and make compromises.” ... “Not all of us have savings and a lot of us have to take care of family because of what happened in the economy,” said Walker, of Santa Clarita, who said she has applied for at least three jobs a week and shares an apartment with her unemployed son, his wife and two children. “It’s going to put my family and me out on the streets.” ... There were 3.9 million job openings across the U.S. at the end of October, according to the Labor Department. That same month, 11.3 million people were looking for work but couldn’t find it, a gap advocates say underscores the need to keep benefits flowing. ... Failure to extend the program will affect 1.9 million people who are forecast to use up their state benefits in the first half of 2014 before they can find work, according to the White House. ... The effect will be especially pronounced in the most-populous U.S. states. In New York, 102,700 people were expected to lose their benefits on Dec. 28, said Chris White, a spokesman for the state’s labor department. In New Jersey, about 90,300 will do the same, according to estimates from Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee. More than 222,000 Californians will likewise see their benefits disappear. ... “I understand the government doesn’t want to pay for people who are taking advantage of it,” she said. “But I am not, and many other people are not.” “I just don’t know what to do, except pray.” Of course, as we discussed in detail previously, this will mean a notable drop in the unemployment rate (for what that is worth)... This has profound implications for the oh-so-important unemployment rate that the Fed is so dependent upon... JPM's Feroli: One observation that could set an upper bound on thinking about a participation effect is to hypothesize that all 1.3 million EUC claimants exit the labor force after benefits expire in 1Q (again, should Congress allow that to happen). In that case, the unemployment rate would fall by 0.8%-pt, obviously an extreme example. Some of the Fed studies can help to narrow the range of outcomes. One of the more recent works (Farber and Valletta from the San Francisco Fed) indicates that about a fifth of long-term unemployment is due to extended benefits. With just over 4 million long-term unemployed recently, this would imply that the absence of extended UI benefits could lower the unemployment rate by 0.5%-pt. This will directly impact the Fed's credibility to manage the economt in a "data-dependent" manner: JPM's Feroli: Setting aside the normative aspect of whether from a public policy perspective this is a desirable or undesirable outcome, such a fall in the unemployment and participation rates could create some tricky choices for Fed policymakers as they assess the health of the labor market. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Horse (#0)
Bonehead better think long and hard about how the pubbies should vote on extending UI benefits. This issue is a mine field as it applies to 2014 elections. Right now the GOP have Bammy and the DemRats on the ropes because of Obamacare. The tea party folks are likely pressing Bonehead to vote against extending UI benefits and that makes perfect fiscal sense. But politically imho, it would be a disaster for the pubbies come 2014 elections. And pls...no one here lecture me about how there's no difference between the 2 fraud parties blah, blah. The majority of you don't live in the Soviet Republic of Kalifornia where there is literally one party rule - it's the DemRats - and it's ugly. Based on my personal experience in a once beautiful state with once the 6th largest economy in the world that has now been brought to its knees, I want the DemRats to lose every f'ing federal seat that their communistic keesters currently occupy in 2014. To have that happen, Bonehead and the GOP need to tread carefully on hearts and flowers issues like extending UI benefits.
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||