[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Is The NSA Quartering “Digital” Troops Within Our Homes?
Source: washingtonsblog.com
URL Source: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014 ... gital-troops-within-homes.html
Published: Jan 1, 2014
Author: WashingtonsBlog
Post Date: 2014-01-04 04:28:15 by GreyLmist
Keywords: Constitution, 3rd Amendment, NSA, Quartering Troops
Views: 2232
Comments: 27

Are “Digital” Troops Being Sent Into Our Digital Devices Like British Troops Were Sent Into American Colonists’ Homes?

We have extensively documented that the U.S. government is trampling virtually every single Constitutional right set forth in the Bill of Rights.

One of the few rights which we thought the government still respects is the the 3rd Amendment, which prohibits the government forcing people to house troops:

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

But security expert Jacob Appelbaum notes that the NSA may be digitally violating the 3rd Amendment.

By way of background, this week Appelbaum was the main force behind an expose in Spiegel – and gave a must-watch talk – on the NSA’s systemic offensive programs to commandeer computers and computer systems, phone connections and phone systems, and communications networks of all types.

Appelbaum shows that the NSA has literally taken over our computer and our phones, physically intercepting laptop shipments and installing bugware before themselves shipping the laptop on to the consumer, installing special hardware that overcomes all privacy attempts, including “air gaps” (i.e. keep a computer unplugged from the Internet). Appelbaum also notes that spyware can suck up a lot of system resources on a computer or smartphone.

And he says this is the digital equivalent of soldiers being stationed in our houses against our will:

[YouTube link set to start at 0:27:04-0:29:04. Transcription from 0:28:14.

So, Validator and Commondeer -- um, which, I mean, clearly, the point of Commondeer, while it's misspelled here...uh, it's not actually, I mean, that's the name of the program...but the point just to make upon: on Commandeering your machine. So, you know, when I think about the, uh, the U.S. Constitution in particular, we talk about not allowing the quartering of soldiers, uh, and, uh, gosh, you know, Commandeering my computer sounds a lot like a digital version of that. And I find that a little bit confusing and mostly in that I don't understand how they get away with it. But part of it is because they can tell right now we didn't know about it in public. Which is why we're releasing this, in the public interest so that we can have a better debate about whether or not that counts, in fact, as a part of this type of what I would consider to be tyranny...]

The parallel might not be as far-fetched as it may seem at first …

The NSA itself says that it’s in the middle of a massive cyber war. As such, malware, physical spying devices and offensive internet workarounds are literally the main troops in the NSA’s offensive cyber army.

Quartering meant that Colonial Americans had:
No control over when the British troops came and went
No say in what resources they consumed
And no privacy even in their own castles

Similarly, mass NSA spying means that modern day Americans have:
No control over when military presence comes or goes from our computer and phones (NSA is part of the Department of Defense)
No say in what resources the spies suck up (remember, Applebaum says that spying can use a lot of resources and harm performance)
And no privacy even in the deepest inner sanctuary of our electronic home base

Colonial Americans lost the quiet use and enjoyment of their homes. Modern Americans are losing the quiet use and enjoyment of our digital homes because the NSA is stationing digital “troops” inside our computers and phones.

Just as the Colonists’ homes were no longer theirs … our computers and phones are no longer ours.


Poster Comment:

Links at the article site.

See also:

Aragorn's Battle Speech - Extended Scene | YouTube link set to start at 2:33

“By all that you hold dear on this good earth, I bid you stand Men of the West!”

LOTR - The Eagles are Coming

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (8/9) Movie CLIP - The Fall of Sauron (2003) HD

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#1. To: All (#0)

Two States, and Counting, Seeking to Ban Data-Sharing with NSA: Kansas and Missouri Seek to Prohibit Use Of Illegally Gathered Electronic Data

California has a New Plan to Fight Back Against the NSA: Cut Off Their Water Supply: Senate Bill 828 was introduced on Monday, and if passed, it would ban utility companies in California from supplying services to the NSA.

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-09   16:27:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: All (#1) (Edited)

Post #1:

Two States, and Counting, Seeking to Ban Data-Sharing with NSA: Kansas and Missouri Seek to Prohibit Use Of Illegally Gathered Electronic Data

California has a New Plan to Fight Back Against the NSA: Cut Off Their Water Supply: Senate Bill 828 was introduced on Monday, and if passed, it would ban utility companies in California from supplying services to the NSA.

Post #6

New Legislation Would Ban NSA From Arizona - US News and World Report: State senator says 'the NSA isn't welcome in Arizona unless it follows the Constitution'

NSA and GCHQ activities appear illegal, says EU parliamentary inquiry

Oklahoma state legislator introduces bill to banish NSA: “We know the NSA is sharing unconstitutionally gathered information with state and local law enforcement agencies – and it has nothing to do with keeping us safe from terrorists. This should offend every American who cares about the Constitution,” Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey.

Indiana 4th Amendment Protection Act Bans Help to NSA, Includes Felony Charges - Tenth Amendment Center Blog: "[NSA] maxed out the Baltimore area power grid in 2006. They’ve built new locations in Utah and Texas, and expanded in several other states,” Maharrey said. [...] The legislation is based off the long-standing legal principle of the anti-commandeering doctrine, which prohibits the federal government from requiring, or “commandeering” the states to carry out their acts. The Supreme Court has upheld the doctrine in four major cases going back to 1842.

WA State Bill Proposes Criminalizing Help to NSA, Turning Off Resources to Yakima Facility - Tenth Amendment Center Blog: Washington counts as the first state with an actual NSA facility within its borders to consider the Fourth Amendment Protection Act.

Edited for formatting + excerpts.

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-20   9:43:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: All (#8) (Edited)

4th Amendment Protection Act

The legislation is based off the long-standing legal principle of the anti- commandeering doctrine, which prohibits the federal government from requiring, or “commandeering” the states to carry out their acts. The Supreme Court has upheld the doctrine in four major cases going back to 1842.

benswann.com: Does the NSA have a facility in your state? You may be surprised

The National Security Agency (NSA) has a global spy network which is far more expansive than many realize. With the help of the Tenth Amendment Center, a national think-tank, many states are fighting back with state level legislation that cuts the NSA off from state resources.

The idea behind the legislation is that, if enacted, states will be able to keep the NSA from commandeering state resources. This will force NSA facilities to look for other locations, making it far more difficult to operate.

As of now, here is a list of geographical locations: [Maryland, Utah, Colorado, Texas, Tennessee, Georgia, Hawaii - details at the site]

The NSA also controls four satellites and has multiple international data centers. Many are wondering what the solution is. As mentioned before, the Tenth Amendment Center has provided one. View the below video to learn more.

YouTube: No Water = No NSA Data Center. #NullifyNSA campaign from OffNow.org

At 0:25 seconds..."Fact: There's absolutely nothing in the Constitution which requires your State to help the Feds violate your rights."

Edited for highlighting.

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-22   17:22:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: GreyLmist (#12)

Utah: Turn off the water

www.change.org/petitions/...n-utah-to-stop-nsa-spying

Itistoolate  posted on  2014-01-22   18:33:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 13.

#14. To: Itistoolate (#13)

Utah: Turn off the water

www.change.org/petitions/...n-utah-to-stop-nsa-spying

Any US citizen plumber "COULD" go out their right now... just out side their property lines and gun lines but where the pipe still feeds in.... One back hoe and problem solved..

IF numbers of citizen plumbers got together their back up tanks could be fixed at the same time with long range plungers. IN FACT if the main feed line is replaced with a corrosive then you know...

Those pipes aren't protect all the way to the lake.

Their IS vulnerability.

titorite  posted on  2014-01-22 22:17:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Itistoolate, 4 (#13)

Utah: Turn off the water

www.change.org/petitions/...n-utah-to-stop-nsa-spying

Thanks for posting that important info at change.org. Highlights:

Nothing in the Constitution requires a state to help the feds violate your rights. This is an undisputed principle known as the anti-commandeering doctrine - the states cannot be compelled to carry out federal acts, regulations, and the like.

The Supreme Court always affirms this, and the prime cases are 1842 Prigg, 1992 New York, 1997 Printz, and 2012 Sebelius.

The state 4th Amendment Protection Act would ban Utah (or any state where it's passed) from participating with or assisting the NSA in any way in the implementation of their warrantless spying program.

While calls to [My note: the U.S.] Congress are likely to fall on deaf ears, calls to your state house[s] actually could make a difference.

Example from the model-correspondence there; to Utah and other State Legislators:

To:
The _UT_ State Senate
The _UT_ State House

Please introduce the 4th Amendment Protection Act in _Utah_ to help put a stop to warrantless NSA Spying.

See the model legislation here:
http://offnow.org/4th

Sincerely,
[Your name]

Excerpts from a December 7, 2013 article by Michael Boldin of the Tenth Amendment Center on Utah issues; posted with Scribd documentation at communities.washingtontimes.com and linked at the change.org page:

Released documents prove that Utah mayor exaggerated NSA water contract

Bluffdale Mayor Derk Timothy brushed off the idea of turning the water off, noting that the city had signed a contract with the NSA. He said, “We have a contract. They negotiated in good faith. We negotiated in good faith.” Timothy also told reporter Brian Mullahy that the city would not even consider turning the water off because of that contract.

Mullahy said, “I asked the Mayor, how long does the contract last? He said, ‘In perpetuity. It keeps going, and going and going.’”

...Timothy is wrong. The contract expires.

“The proposed Utah 4th Amendment Protection Act would ban any city or state agency from providing material resources, like water, to the NSA while it continues its warrantless mass-spying program. So that would take the decision over it out of the Mayor’s hands,” said [Mike Maharrey, national communications director for the Tenth Amendment Center].

“On top of it,” he continued, “If the Act is signed into law, the local contract will be immediately in conflict with the state law. At that point, it can no longer be renewed, and could actually be deemed invalid in a Utah court of law.”

...In its opinion on Salt Lake County v. Holliday Water Co., the Utah Supreme Court wrote that “when a legislative enactment renders preexisting contract terms illegal the contract may be deemed unenforceable.”

...the court does hold that it has the power to invalidate such a contract should the “preservation of the" [My note: Constitution and/or the] "public welfare” require it.

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-25 09:06:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]