[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water

Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that "soak up" forever chemicals in the body

Israel limits entry of baby formula in Gaza as infants die of hunger

17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES

Report: Pentagon Halts Some Munitions Shipments To Ukraine Over Concerns That US Stockpiles Are Too Low

Locals Fear Demolitions as Israeli Troops Set Up New Base in Syrias Quneitra

Russian forces discover cache of Ukrainian chemical drone munitions FSB

Clarissa Ward: Gaza is what is turning people overseas against the US

What Parents Wish Their Children Could Grow Up Without

WHY SO MANY FOREIGN BASES IN AFRICA?

Trump called Candace Owens about Brigitte Macron's P*NIS?

New Mexico Is The Most-Dependent State On The Federal Govt, New Jersey The Least


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Is The NSA Quartering “Digital” Troops Within Our Homes?
Source: washingtonsblog.com
URL Source: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014 ... gital-troops-within-homes.html
Published: Jan 1, 2014
Author: WashingtonsBlog
Post Date: 2014-01-04 04:28:15 by GreyLmist
Keywords: Constitution, 3rd Amendment, NSA, Quartering Troops
Views: 2163
Comments: 27

Are “Digital” Troops Being Sent Into Our Digital Devices Like British Troops Were Sent Into American Colonists’ Homes?

We have extensively documented that the U.S. government is trampling virtually every single Constitutional right set forth in the Bill of Rights.

One of the few rights which we thought the government still respects is the the 3rd Amendment, which prohibits the government forcing people to house troops:

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

But security expert Jacob Appelbaum notes that the NSA may be digitally violating the 3rd Amendment.

By way of background, this week Appelbaum was the main force behind an expose in Spiegel – and gave a must-watch talk – on the NSA’s systemic offensive programs to commandeer computers and computer systems, phone connections and phone systems, and communications networks of all types.

Appelbaum shows that the NSA has literally taken over our computer and our phones, physically intercepting laptop shipments and installing bugware before themselves shipping the laptop on to the consumer, installing special hardware that overcomes all privacy attempts, including “air gaps” (i.e. keep a computer unplugged from the Internet). Appelbaum also notes that spyware can suck up a lot of system resources on a computer or smartphone.

And he says this is the digital equivalent of soldiers being stationed in our houses against our will:

[YouTube link set to start at 0:27:04-0:29:04. Transcription from 0:28:14.

So, Validator and Commondeer -- um, which, I mean, clearly, the point of Commondeer, while it's misspelled here...uh, it's not actually, I mean, that's the name of the program...but the point just to make upon: on Commandeering your machine. So, you know, when I think about the, uh, the U.S. Constitution in particular, we talk about not allowing the quartering of soldiers, uh, and, uh, gosh, you know, Commandeering my computer sounds a lot like a digital version of that. And I find that a little bit confusing and mostly in that I don't understand how they get away with it. But part of it is because they can tell right now we didn't know about it in public. Which is why we're releasing this, in the public interest so that we can have a better debate about whether or not that counts, in fact, as a part of this type of what I would consider to be tyranny...]

The parallel might not be as far-fetched as it may seem at first …

The NSA itself says that it’s in the middle of a massive cyber war. As such, malware, physical spying devices and offensive internet workarounds are literally the main troops in the NSA’s offensive cyber army.

Quartering meant that Colonial Americans had:
No control over when the British troops came and went
No say in what resources they consumed
And no privacy even in their own castles

Similarly, mass NSA spying means that modern day Americans have:
No control over when military presence comes or goes from our computer and phones (NSA is part of the Department of Defense)
No say in what resources the spies suck up (remember, Applebaum says that spying can use a lot of resources and harm performance)
And no privacy even in the deepest inner sanctuary of our electronic home base

Colonial Americans lost the quiet use and enjoyment of their homes. Modern Americans are losing the quiet use and enjoyment of our digital homes because the NSA is stationing digital “troops” inside our computers and phones.

Just as the Colonists’ homes were no longer theirs … our computers and phones are no longer ours.


Poster Comment:

Links at the article site.

See also:

Aragorn's Battle Speech - Extended Scene | YouTube link set to start at 2:33

“By all that you hold dear on this good earth, I bid you stand Men of the West!”

LOTR - The Eagles are Coming

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (8/9) Movie CLIP - The Fall of Sauron (2003) HD

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

Two States, and Counting, Seeking to Ban Data-Sharing with NSA: Kansas and Missouri Seek to Prohibit Use Of Illegally Gathered Electronic Data

California has a New Plan to Fight Back Against the NSA: Cut Off Their Water Supply: Senate Bill 828 was introduced on Monday, and if passed, it would ban utility companies in California from supplying services to the NSA.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-09   16:27:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: GreyLmist (#1)

Local resistance, non-cooperation, countervailing state legislation, etc., etc.

Kick 'em where it hurts.

Stomp on their guts.

Know guns, know safety, know liberty. No guns, no safety, no liberty.

randge  posted on  2014-01-09   18:11:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: randge (#2)

All that I can suggest to your tag's link, is to be sure and get some fresh ammo.

Remembering finding some loose .22 rounds in my grandparents dresser, back when, and "firing" them...a good fart would have gone further, faster.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-01-09   19:04:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Lod (#3)

a good fart would have gone further, faster.

Very descriptive even if correct or not.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-01-09   19:59:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Lod (#3)

be sure and get some fresh ammo

We "roll our own" Lod. Thanks.

I've shot a number of rounds that were loaded before I was born. Others 30 or forty years old. A few fire normally. There is deterioration in the powder charge in most of those rounds. The primers seem to be the most dependable component of the load. I only had one misfire in all the outdated ammo I've tried out.

It's really not safe to experiment like this though. I take stuff I get with old rifles to the desk at the range & they're happy to dispose of it for me.

Know guns, know safety, know liberty. No guns, no safety, no liberty.

randge  posted on  2014-01-10   7:55:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: randge (#2)

Local resistance, non-cooperation, countervailing state legislation, etc., etc.

New Legislation Would Ban NSA From Arizona - US News and World Report: State senator says 'the NSA isn't welcome in Arizona unless it follows the Constitution'

NSA and GCHQ activities appear illegal, says EU parliamentary inquiry

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-12   4:14:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: All (#6) (Edited)

Comments at The Last Great Stand » Justice Scalia Slams Obama On Executive Overreach!

"'People' are watching you."

"I ain't skeered.
18 USC Sec 241, 242
42 USC sec 1983, 1985, 1986"

Research: Conspiracy Against Rights and Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

rense.com: "U.S.C. - How To Shackle The Corrupt Government Gang" From Walter Burien http://CAFR1.com 11-1-4 [Links at the site]

Additional references:

www.law.cornell.edu › U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 13
www.fbi.gov
www.justice.gov

Amendment 9: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Edited for spacing.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-15   15:26:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: All (#1) (Edited)

Post #1:

Two States, and Counting, Seeking to Ban Data-Sharing with NSA: Kansas and Missouri Seek to Prohibit Use Of Illegally Gathered Electronic Data

California has a New Plan to Fight Back Against the NSA: Cut Off Their Water Supply: Senate Bill 828 was introduced on Monday, and if passed, it would ban utility companies in California from supplying services to the NSA.

Post #6

New Legislation Would Ban NSA From Arizona - US News and World Report: State senator says 'the NSA isn't welcome in Arizona unless it follows the Constitution'

NSA and GCHQ activities appear illegal, says EU parliamentary inquiry

Oklahoma state legislator introduces bill to banish NSA: “We know the NSA is sharing unconstitutionally gathered information with state and local law enforcement agencies – and it has nothing to do with keeping us safe from terrorists. This should offend every American who cares about the Constitution,” Tenth Amendment Center communications director Mike Maharrey.

Indiana 4th Amendment Protection Act Bans Help to NSA, Includes Felony Charges - Tenth Amendment Center Blog: "[NSA] maxed out the Baltimore area power grid in 2006. They’ve built new locations in Utah and Texas, and expanded in several other states,” Maharrey said. [...] The legislation is based off the long-standing legal principle of the anti-commandeering doctrine, which prohibits the federal government from requiring, or “commandeering” the states to carry out their acts. The Supreme Court has upheld the doctrine in four major cases going back to 1842.

WA State Bill Proposes Criminalizing Help to NSA, Turning Off Resources to Yakima Facility - Tenth Amendment Center Blog: Washington counts as the first state with an actual NSA facility within its borders to consider the Fourth Amendment Protection Act.

Edited for formatting + excerpts.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-20   9:43:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: All (#8)

Map of State legislation and other info at Tracking and Action Center - NSA Spying: 4th Amendment Protection - Tenth Amendment Center

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-20   10:13:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: GreyLmist (#0)

I think I'd rather see the more logical 4th amendment applied to this because what is happening is illegal search and seizure. And I can attest , I have government run snooper programs on my computer system. Since they are window based programs I have no idea what they will interface with on a linux system... ICE...ICE has the outdated snooper ware on me.. their is another one too maybe more... I have not been real through about checking my own system out...

I figured it was related to my circumstances.

BUt yeah Nothing is being quartered. We are not stashing their guns, their horses. and their men. They are taking over your computers and monitoring you.

SO thats more 4th amendment stuff rather than 3rd amendment stuff IMHO.

LINUX! Just running it is a surprising and awesome cyber defense.

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.

titorite  posted on  2014-01-20   11:12:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: titorite (#10) (Edited)

They are taking over your computers and monitoring you.

SO thats more 4th amendment stuff rather than 3rd amendment stuff IMHO.

The NSA is a Military agency. As the opening post video and transcription addresses, they are commandeering our property. I think that does pertain to the 3rd Amendment, as well as the 4th and others.

Edited last sentence.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-20   11:31:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: All (#8) (Edited)

4th Amendment Protection Act

The legislation is based off the long-standing legal principle of the anti- commandeering doctrine, which prohibits the federal government from requiring, or “commandeering” the states to carry out their acts. The Supreme Court has upheld the doctrine in four major cases going back to 1842.

benswann.com: Does the NSA have a facility in your state? You may be surprised

The National Security Agency (NSA) has a global spy network which is far more expansive than many realize. With the help of the Tenth Amendment Center, a national think-tank, many states are fighting back with state level legislation that cuts the NSA off from state resources.

The idea behind the legislation is that, if enacted, states will be able to keep the NSA from commandeering state resources. This will force NSA facilities to look for other locations, making it far more difficult to operate.

As of now, here is a list of geographical locations: [Maryland, Utah, Colorado, Texas, Tennessee, Georgia, Hawaii - details at the site]

The NSA also controls four satellites and has multiple international data centers. Many are wondering what the solution is. As mentioned before, the Tenth Amendment Center has provided one. View the below video to learn more.

YouTube: No Water = No NSA Data Center. #NullifyNSA campaign from OffNow.org

At 0:25 seconds..."Fact: There's absolutely nothing in the Constitution which requires your State to help the Feds violate your rights."

Edited for highlighting.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-22   17:22:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: GreyLmist (#12)

Utah: Turn off the water

www.change.org/petitions/...n-utah-to-stop-nsa-spying

Itistoolate  posted on  2014-01-22   18:33:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Itistoolate (#13)

Utah: Turn off the water

www.change.org/petitions/...n-utah-to-stop-nsa-spying

Any US citizen plumber "COULD" go out their right now... just out side their property lines and gun lines but where the pipe still feeds in.... One back hoe and problem solved..

IF numbers of citizen plumbers got together their back up tanks could be fixed at the same time with long range plungers. IN FACT if the main feed line is replaced with a corrosive then you know...

Those pipes aren't protect all the way to the lake.

Their IS vulnerability.

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.

titorite  posted on  2014-01-22   22:17:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: titorite (#14)

Russell,

Get a grip. If states are acting to cut off the utilities, citizens should stand back and wait...not do stupid things that would most likely get them killed.

Keep your backhoe in the garage, for now.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-01-22   22:27:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: All (#8) (Edited)

New Legislation Would Ban NSA From Arizona - US News and World Report: State senator says 'the NSA isn't welcome in Arizona unless it follows the Constitution'

"I believe the number one priority for national security is defending and protecting the Constitution," the Republican who represents the Lake Havasu City area of northwest Arizona said in a statement. "Without that, the rest becomes irrelevant. There is no question that the NSA program, as it is now being run, violates the Fourth Amendment. This is a way to stop it."

Arizona Bill to Thwart NSA Spying Officially Introduced

Arizona state Senator Kelli Ward made good on her commitment to introduce legislation that would withdraw all state support of the NSA and hang a big “Spies Not Welcome Here” sign on the front door of the Grand Canyon State this week.

After being the first legislator in the country to announce an intent to do so last fall, Ward along with nine sponsors introduced the Fourth Amendment Protection Act on Wednesday. SB1156 also garnered four co-sponsors, including senate President Andy Biggs.

Tennessee files historic legislation; Takes aim at state’s NSA facility - Ben Swann Truth In Media

The NSA has been operating directly underneath the nose of many Tennesseans without them ever knowing. ... Tennessee makes the eighth state considering action to refuse cooperation with the NSA, [two having] physical facilities within their borders.

Alphabetically: Arizona, California, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Washington State

Edited the Ben Swann excerpts.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-25   6:21:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: All (#12) (Edited)

benswann.com: Does the NSA have a facility in your state? You may be surprised

As of now, here is a list of geographical locations: [Maryland, Utah, Colorado, Texas, Tennessee, Georgia, Hawaii

and Washington State - details on those noted above at the site]

Edited for site-list clarification.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-25   6:51:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Itistoolate, 4 (#13)

Utah: Turn off the water

www.change.org/petitions/...n-utah-to-stop-nsa-spying

Thanks for posting that important info at change.org. Highlights:

Nothing in the Constitution requires a state to help the feds violate your rights. This is an undisputed principle known as the anti-commandeering doctrine - the states cannot be compelled to carry out federal acts, regulations, and the like.

The Supreme Court always affirms this, and the prime cases are 1842 Prigg, 1992 New York, 1997 Printz, and 2012 Sebelius.

The state 4th Amendment Protection Act would ban Utah (or any state where it's passed) from participating with or assisting the NSA in any way in the implementation of their warrantless spying program.

While calls to [My note: the U.S.] Congress are likely to fall on deaf ears, calls to your state house[s] actually could make a difference.

Example from the model-correspondence there; to Utah and other State Legislators:

To:
The _UT_ State Senate
The _UT_ State House

Please introduce the 4th Amendment Protection Act in _Utah_ to help put a stop to warrantless NSA Spying.

See the model legislation here:
http://offnow.org/4th

Sincerely,
[Your name]

Excerpts from a December 7, 2013 article by Michael Boldin of the Tenth Amendment Center on Utah issues; posted with Scribd documentation at communities.washingtontimes.com and linked at the change.org page:

Released documents prove that Utah mayor exaggerated NSA water contract

Bluffdale Mayor Derk Timothy brushed off the idea of turning the water off, noting that the city had signed a contract with the NSA. He said, “We have a contract. They negotiated in good faith. We negotiated in good faith.” Timothy also told reporter Brian Mullahy that the city would not even consider turning the water off because of that contract.

Mullahy said, “I asked the Mayor, how long does the contract last? He said, ‘In perpetuity. It keeps going, and going and going.’”

...Timothy is wrong. The contract expires.

“The proposed Utah 4th Amendment Protection Act would ban any city or state agency from providing material resources, like water, to the NSA while it continues its warrantless mass-spying program. So that would take the decision over it out of the Mayor’s hands,” said [Mike Maharrey, national communications director for the Tenth Amendment Center].

“On top of it,” he continued, “If the Act is signed into law, the local contract will be immediately in conflict with the state law. At that point, it can no longer be renewed, and could actually be deemed invalid in a Utah court of law.”

...In its opinion on Salt Lake County v. Holliday Water Co., the Utah Supreme Court wrote that “when a legislative enactment renders preexisting contract terms illegal the contract may be deemed unenforceable.”

...the court does hold that it has the power to invalidate such a contract should the “preservation of the" [My note: Constitution and/or the] "public welfare” require it.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-01-25   9:06:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: All (#16)

Alphabetically: Arizona, California, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Washington State

Updated alphabetically from 8 to 12 -- 24%, nearly 1/4 of all the States with legislation in-process to protect the 4th Amendment from NSA abuses. Reference: Tracking and Action Center - NSA Spying: 4th Amendment Protection. Click on the States at the map for further details and legislature contact info.

1. Alaska: HB283 and SB142

2. Arizona: SB1156

3. California: SB828

4. Indiana: SB231

5. Kansas: HB2421

6. Mississippi: SB2438

7. Missouri: SJR27

8. New Hampshire: HB1533 and HB1619

9. Oklahoma: SB1252 and HB2808

10. Tennessee: SB1849 and HB1907

11. Vermont: H732

12. Washington State: HB2272

January 31, 2014: Twelve and counting: Vermont legislation takes on NSA spying

February 3, 2014: First in the nation: Arizona senate committee passes 4th Amendment Protection Act

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-02-09   1:14:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: All (#0)

the digital equivalent of soldiers being stationed in our houses against our will

Cross-referencing Posts #3, #4, #5, #6 and #7 at 4um Title: "NSA admits listening to U.S. phone calls without warrants" for more on the 3rd Amendment issue, regarding the stationing of foreign and mercenary forces also. The supposed basis for that Unconstitutional "policy" is claimed to be the WWII-era Atlantic Charter but, as noted at Post #7 in the above linked-series, "there was no formal, legal document entitled 'The Atlantic Charter'" and "No signed version ever existed."

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-02-09   4:42:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: randge, Lod, Cynicom (#5)

Utah and California in the news, ammo issue:

February 17th, 2014 article with video: 3 bald eagles died from lead poisoning, rehabilitation center says

One eagle that swallowed a piece of buckshot had to undergo surgery, but it didn't survive long afterward. ... encouraging voters to write their congressional representatives and ask that lead-free rounds be required by law, following other states like California.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-02-20   23:39:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: All (#19)

Update from 12 States to 14 for Maryland and Utah.

February 10, 2014 | BREAKING: Maryland Legislators Move To Kill NSA Headquarters - Ben Swann Truth In Media

State lawmakers in Maryland have filed emergency status legislation that seeks to cut the NSA’s Ft. Meade headquarters off from all material support stemming from the state.

February 12, 2014 | BREAKING: Utah legislators move to kill NSA data center - Ben Swann Truth In Media

bill introduced ... “The NSA was welcomed by politicians in Utah with a promise that their activities would be “conducted according to constitutional law”. As we all know, that promise has been violated— institutionally, repeatedly, and aggressively,” said Utah Libertas Institute President Conor Boyack. ”If Congress and the Courts are unable or unwilling to rein in this beast and put a stop to the rising surveillance state, then it’s up to the states to stake their ground and resist such broad violations of the Constitution. This new bill, along with others like it in over a dozen states, would accomplish that very thing.”

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-02-21   0:25:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: All (#22)

Update from 12 States to 14 for Maryland and Utah.

#15 moving to protect the 4th Amendment against NSA abuses: Oregon

News updates at offnow.org | Nullify NSA!:

March 5, 2014 | Oregon State Senator Plans Ballot Initiative to Thwart the Surveillance State

An Oregon bill to protect citizens’ privacy rights from unlawful NSA intrusion got the ball rolling and the legislator who sponsored it vowed to use it as a stepping stone to get a ballot initiative ready for 2016.

SB1583 would have prohibited any “public body from obtaining location information of cellular telephone or other electronic communication device without warrant, consent or certain emergent circumstances.” Sen. Larry George (R-Sherwood) introduced the bill in the fiscal (short) session, knowing he didn’t likely have the time to get the bill passed. But George recognized it would put the issue on the table and pave the way for future action. Now he plans to carry the fight right to Oregon voters. ... That isn’t the only action expected in the near future on this front. According to the Oregon ACLU, the groundwork has been laid for the success of privacy protection bills during next year’s legislative session. ... “Taking on the NSA isn’t a one-step, short-term project. It is going to require sustained efforts. Rep. George understands this, We are committed to seeing it through and stopping unconstitutional spying,” Tenth Amendment Center national communications director Mike Maharrey said. “I am not at all disappointed about the SB1583. It was a first step. It won’t be the last. I am certain the people of Oregon will vote on the side of the Constitution.

See also:

March 3, 2014 | Utah house takes first step against the surveillance state. Passes bill 71-2

While awaiting action on a bill to turn off the water to the NSA data center in Bluffdale, the Utah House wasted no time passing another bill designed to thwart the effects of other actions of the growing surveillance state. The vote was 71-2. ... HB0128 would make any electronic data obtained by law enforcement inadmissible in a criminal proceeding. This includes data gathered by the NSA and shared through the super secret Special Operations Division (SOD) or fusion centers. The legislation also stops Utah law enforcement from obtaining phone location data without a warrant. ... HB0128 now moves on to the Senate for consideration. ... HB0128 will prevent state law enforcement from gathering cell phone location data and sharing it up the chain, and it will make information vacuumed up by the feds and shared down the chain inadmissible in court, stopping a practical effect of NSA spying. ... The legislation works hand-in-hand with the more well-known “4th Amendment Protection Act” introduced by Rep. Marc Roberts last month. HB161 would ban material support to the NSA’s new data center at Bluffdale.

March 5, 2014 | New Hampshire house passes bill to ban use of warrantless data

Today, the New Hampshire house passed a bill to thwart some of the actions of the growing surveillance state. House Bill 1533 (HB1533), which bans the use of any information obtained from a “portable electronic device” such as mobile phone in “a criminal, civil, administrative, or other proceeding,” passed by a voice vote and now moves on to the senate for further consideration. ... Also this week, a house committee gave final approval to HB1567, which bans the state from obtaining “location information of an electronic device without a warrant issued by a judge based on probable cause and on a case-by-case basis.” And HB1619 was previously approved by that same committee. That bill prohibits the acquisition, collection, or retention of personal information including “personal identifiers, content, and usage, given or available to third-party providers of information and services, including telephone; electric, water and other utility services; internet service providers; social media providers; banks and financial institutions; insurance companies; and credit card companies.” ... HB1533 now moves on to the state senate, where it will first need to be approved by a committee before the full senate has an opportunity to concur. HB1567 and HB1619 are due for a full state house vote before the end of March.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-03-06   12:46:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: All (#23) (Edited)

Update from 12 States to 14 for Maryland and Utah.

#15 moving to protect the 4th Amendment against NSA abuses: Oregon

#16 South Carolina

#17 Michigan

#18 Minnesota

News updates at offnow.org | Nullify NSA!:

March 10, 2014 | South Carolina 4th Amendment Protection Act has strong bipartisan support [H.4795]

The campaign to stop unconstitutional NSA spying at the state and local level has clearly taken on a life of its own, and is gaining support from across the political spectrum. A bipartisan group of 23 South Carolina representatives introduced the Fourth Amendment Protection Act late last month. Cosponsors include leadership from both parties,

March 21, 2014 | Bipartisan Michigan bill would ban resources to NSA [HB5420]

House Bill 5420 (HB5420), the Fourth Amendment Protection Act, was introduced by Rep. Tom McMillin (R-Rochester) on Thursday to prohibit any state support of the NSA. Cosponsors include 5 Republicans and 5 Democrats, closely matching the party breakdown of the state house.

March 21, 2014 | Minnesota bills would ban cellphone tracking without a warrant [HF2553 and HF2288]

Two Minnesota bills that together ban law enforcement from obtaining cellphone location tracking information and data without a warrant passed its first committee hurdle. ... HF2553 and HF2288 would not only protect people in Minnesota from warrantless data gathering by state and local law enforcement, it will also end some practical effects of unconstitutional data gathering by the federal government.

Edit to add Minnesota info.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-03-31   4:51:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: All (#24)

News updates at offnow.org | Nullify NSA!:

March 7, 2014 | Utah house committee holds first hearing on the 4th Amendment Protection Act

With Utah legislative session ending in just days, a state house panel held its first hearing today on a bill which supporters hope will be used to turn off the water to the new NSA data center in that state.

March 12, 2014 | Utah Senate passes bill to ban warrantless data, 28-0

SALT LAKE CITY, March 12, 2014 – Today, the Utah state senate unanimously passed a bill to thwart some of the effects of the growing surveillance state. The vote was 28-0. ... HB0128 now goes back to the State House for a final approval before being sent to the Governor’s desk for a signature this week.

March 12, 2014 | New Hampshire house passes anti-surveillance bill

CONCORD, N.H., March 12, 2014 – Today, the New Hampshire state house passed a bill designed to thwart the effects of warrantless surveillance. [HB1619] passed out of committee in February by a vote of 16-1, and passed the full state house today by a voice vote. House Bill 1533 (HB1533), which bans the use of any information obtained from a “portable electronic device” such as mobile phone in “a criminal, civil, administrative, or other proceeding,” passed the house and is now under consideration in the Senate Judiciary committee. HB1567, which bans the state from obtaining “location information of an electronic device without a warrant issued by a judge based on probable cause and on a case-by-case basis,” is expected to be voted on by the full house by the end of March.

March 14, 2014 | Missouri house bans cellphone tracking without a warrant, 134-13

Yesterday, the Missouri house overwhelmingly approved a bill to ban the obtaining of cellphone location tracking information without a warrant. House Bill 1388 (HB1388) prohibits use of such information in civil or criminal proceedings, and even bans its use as “an affidavit of probable cause in an effort to obtain a search warrant.”

March 19, 2014 | New Hampshire house bans warrantless tracking of cell phones

HB1567 will not only add a key protection to bolster the privacy rights of New Hampshire residents from potential local abuse, it will also end some practical effects of unconstitutional data gathering by the federal government.

March 26, 2014 | Tennessee senate committee passes bill to ban cellphone tracking, 6-0

Introduced by Sen. Mae Beavers, Senate Bill 2087 (SB2087) passed through the Judiciary Committee on Tuesday by a unanimous 6-0 vote. Once assigned to the schedule by the calendar and rules committee, it will be debated and voted on in the full Senate.

March 27, 2014 | Tennessee bill to ban warrantless data moves forward

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (March 27, 2014) – An amended version of the Tennessee Fourth Amendment Protection Act which would end the use of unconstitutionally gathered data in state court passed out of a House subcommittee on Wednesday. ... HB1907 passed out of a subcommittee of the Civil Justice Committee and was scheduled for a hearing in the full committee on April 2

March 27, 2014 | Turn it off: Missouri senate committee passes bill to take on NSA

A bill that would prohibit Missouri from offering any material support to the NSA or other federal agencies engaging in warrantless mass surveillance passed out of committee today. ... [SB819] cleared the Senate Governmental Accountability and Fiscal Oversight Committee with a do-pass recommendation. It can now move on to the full Senate for consideration. ... The Missouri Fourth Amendment Protection Act would work together with a proposed state constitutional amendment moving toward approval in the Missouri legislature to addresses the fourth OffNow legislative goal. SJR 27 proposes an amendment to the state constitution that would add electronic communications to the objects protected from search or seizure without a warrant under the Missouri constitution’s search and seizure clause. If SJR27 passes out of the full legislature, the amendment language will go before voters in the next general election. SJR27 has also passed out of committee and will come up before the full Senate in the near future.

March 29, 2014 | Victory! NSA water records to be released in Utah

The city of Bluffdale has been compelled to release records on water use at the NSA data center. This is a big early win for supporters of the campaign to turn it off.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-03-31   8:08:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: GreyLmist (#0)

Neo TryingtoWarnYou  posted on  2015-02-20   11:15:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: All (#25)

Scroll down for many pages of legislative News updates and more since last year at offnow.org + for State Bill Status Tracking Map at offnow.org/state.

Currently in the News at Activist Post on Tuesday, March 17, 2015:

Bill to Pull Plug On NSA Introduced in Texas

Legislation would Turn Off Water and Electric to San Antonio Facility

A Texas legislator introduced a bill that would stop the independent Texas power grid from being used to power mass, warrantless surveillance by the NSA last week.

Rep. Jonathan Stickland (R) introduced House Bill 3916 (HB3916) on March 13. The legislation would prohibit any political subdivision in Texas from providing water or electricity to any federal agency "involved in the routine surveillance or collection and storage of bulk telephone or e-mail records or related metadata concerning any citizen of the United States and that claims the legal authority to collect and store the bulk telephone or e-mail records or metadata concerning any citizen of the United States without the citizen's consent or a search warrant that describes the person, place, or thing to be searched or seized."

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-03-18   3:03:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]