[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Daniela Cambone: Danger Not Seen in 40+ Years Tucker Carlson: Whistleblower Exposes the Real Puppet Masters Controlling the State Department Democrat nominee for NJ Governor, says that she will push an LGBTQ agenda in schools and WILL NOT allow parents to opt out. Holy SH*T, America's blood supply is tainted with mRNA Thomas Massie's America First : A Documentary by Tom Woods & Dan Smotz Kenvue Craters On Report RFK Jr To Link Autism To Tylenol Use In Pregnancy All 76 weapons at China 2025 military parade explained. 47 are brand new. Chef: Strategy for Salting Steaks 'Dangerous' Chagas disease confirmed in California, raising concerns for Bay Area MICROPLASTICS ARE LINKED TO HEART DISEASE; HERE'S HOW TO LOWER YOUR RISK This Scholar PREDICTED the COLLAPSE of America 700 years ago I Got ChatGPT To Admit Its Antichrist Purpose "The CIA is inside Venezuela right now" Col Macgregor says regime change is coming Caroline Kennedy’s son, Jack Schlossberg, mulling a run. Florida Surgeon General Nukes ALL School Vaxx Mandates, Likens Them to Slavery Doc on High Protein Diet. Try for more plant based protein. ICE EMPTIES Amazon Warehouse… Prime Orders HALTED as ‘Migrant Workforce’ REMOVED Trump to ask SCOTUS to reverse E. Jean Carroll sex-abuse verdict Wary Of Gasoline Shortage, California Pauses Price-Gouging Penalty On Oil Companies Jewish activist Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for the destruction of European The Democrats Are Literally Making Stuff Up! Turn Dead Dirt Into Living Soil With IMO 4 Michael Knowles: Trump & Israel, Candace Owens, and Why Christianity Is Booming Despite the Attacks Save Canada's Ostrich Farms! Protests Erupt Over Government Tyranny in Canada Holy SH*T! Poland just admitted the TRUTH about Zelensky and it's not good Very Alarming Earthquakes Strike As We Enter The Month Of September Billionaire Airbnb Co-Founder Reveals Why He Abandoned Democrat Party For Trump Monsoon floods devastate Punjab’s crops, (1.7 billion people) at risk of food crisis List Of 18 Things That Are Going To Happen Within The Next 40 Days Pentagon Taps 600 Military Lawyers To Serve As Temporary Immigration Judges For DOJ

Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: Napolitano: Impeachment Only Way to Stop Obama's Executive Actions
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.newsmax.com/NewsmaxTv/an ... 74_02142014&promo_code=16770-1
Published: Feb 13, 2014
Author: Greg Richter
Post Date: 2014-02-15 21:29:45 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 264
Comments: 13

Napolitano: Impeachment Only Way to Stop Obama's Executive Actions

Thursday, 13 Feb 2014 06:13 PM

By Greg Richter

The only way to stop President Barack Obama from nullifying duly enacted laws is impeachment, says Judge Andrew Napolitano. The problem is, neither Congress nor the American public have the guts for it.

"The president is doing the opposite of what he was elected to do," Napolitano said Thursday on Fox News Channel's "Your World with Neil Cavuto." Napolitano is a former New Jersey Superior Court judge and a Fox News legal analyst.

Urgent: Do You Approve Or Disapprove of President Obama's Job Performance? Vote Now in Urgent Poll

When Obama picks and chooses which laws, or portions of them, to enforce, he actually is telling people how to avoid obeying the law, he told Cavuto.

"At some point he is totally frustrating what Congress has written," Napolitano said. Republicans have accused Obama of using his executive powers improperly to delay portions of his own healthcare law for political expediency. They also say he has used those powers to enact gun control and immigration rules.

Napolitano said there are 11 million people in the United States who could be deported to their native countries, but Obama has told them, "If you do A, B, C, D, and E, I won't deport you" — effectively telling them they can break the law and suffer no consequences.

Faced with a Republican-controlled House of Representatives and fear of losing the Senate over the unpopularity of Obamacare, the president vowed in January to take more executive action.

Though Sen. Rand Paul sued Obama this week over NSA surveillance, Napolitano said a lawsuit over Obama's executive actions would be tossed out of court. A judge would tell any member of Congress bringing such a suit to instead begin impeachment proceedings.

But that won't happen, Napolitano added.

"There's sort or a cult around him in the Democratic Party that he's 'our guy' and he can do whatever he wants." he said.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/NewsmaxTv/andrew-napolitano-impeachment-executive-action/2014/02/13/id/552712#ixzz2tRphkunu

Poster Comment:

Napolitano says it all in the last sentence of this article. ;)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

With a Congress under the Control of the Israeli lobby and not being able to get its act together Executive Orders is about the only thing Obama can do.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2014-02-15   22:28:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's so very nice of the Judge to be vocal about Obozo but honestly, It'd do a lot more good to expose the fact that EVERY_FUCKING_THING FEDERAL is shit. Pure shit.

Americans can't expect CONgress or the Courts to do anything to nig-gate the Homo-In-Chief's Executive Authority, only the American people can do that. Americans vote for change that they never get, and for people that are so compromised and narcissistic that the only optin they have is to sell the voters out to their communist masters.

When the working class stiff remembers that it is he that makes the world go around and not these puffed up pussies in D.C., then just maybe the country can get back to semi-normal.

I think the congress are actually Real-Estate Salespeople. They're too busy selling the country to China to have any positive effect upon Americans. I think the fact that we laugh at the Indians over the way New York was purchased for some bobbles and beads compared to today's bargain basement discount giveaway of the whole fucking country is more than hilarious.

Doesn't anyone get it, yet ? The nation is being sold off through debt obligations of all sorts that are IN FACT purely virtual. They don't exist and never should have existed. Aside from its military prowess, America looks like a drunken girly-boy staggering down a very dark alley being followed by a Chinese gang with nothing good in mind for their prey. And, D.C. [District of China] is being managed by the Synagogue of Satan through the international shylocks that reside in the worldwide central banking cancer eating the body politic alive.

America was once great because America was (pretty) good. That America has been flushed down the D.C. shitter and all that's left to do is wipe our asses out.

"A wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circlue of our felicities.

Thomas Jefferson

noone222  posted on  2014-02-16   5:25:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

By the way, Napolitano is one of them. He worships at the foot of the bloated FEDERAL Govt.

Making a living talking a limited amount of shit while collecting his federal retirement doesn't make him a hero in my eyes.

"A wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circlue of our felicities.

Thomas Jefferson

noone222  posted on  2014-02-16   5:56:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

By the way, Napolitano is one of them. He worships at the foot of the bloated FEDERAL Govt.

Making a living talking a limited amount of shit while collecting his federal retirement doesn't make him a hero in my eyes.

Napolitano is one of them.

BTW, nice rant above. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2014-02-16   8:15:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

"There's sort or a cult around him in the Democratic Party that he's 'our guy' and he can do whatever he wants." he said.

Yeah, the cult is the partisan Democrat. The Republicans have their cult as well. Both cults will back "their" guy no matter what they do. They are sycophants.

As for being no impeachment, the good judge is correct but he won't voice the real reason why, which is that the Republicans want Obama to set this precedent so when their guy wins the presidency he can do the exact same thing.

This is all part of the kabuki theater that is Washington DC. Machinations within machinations that make the Byzantine empire look amateurish.

Though Sen. Rand Paul sued Obama this week over NSA surveillance, Napolitano said a lawsuit over Obama's executive actions would be tossed out of court. A judge would tell any member of Congress bringing such a suit to instead begin impeachment proceedings.

Paul knows this. Paul is acting as a pressure relief valve for the Republican/Democratic organized crime syndicate. He is giving those few who care and pay attention a place to channel their anger in order to make them "feel" like they are actually doing something that will make a difference. This lawsuit will drag on for years until it gets to the USSC - or maybe not. It might drag along up until the Republicans win back the White House. Then it may just silently be dropped.

Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown

I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT!
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2014-02-16   11:13:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

1. They are sycophants.

2. This is all part of the kabuki theater that is Washington DC. Machinations within machinations that make the Byzantine empire look amateurish.

1. I haven't seen that word for quite some time.

2. It is indeed all a Kabuki theater. The machinations get more bizarre as time goes by. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2014-02-16   11:25:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Napolitano said a lawsuit over Obama's executive actions would be tossed out of court. A judge would tell any member of Congress bringing such a suit to instead begin impeachment proceedings.

Any judge who thinks impeachment is a substitute for Judicial branch prosecution or some sort of an immunity from that and arrest is wrong. The Constitution addresses when and where a Congressional officeholder can or can't be arrested, for instance, but no officeholder has immunity from the law and apprehension for violations of it. Impeachment just removes someone from office if the legislature so decides and rescinds their law credentials. It is not an escape hatch for the privileged to evade other sentencing and does not have to be done successfully first before they can be charged and tried in the court system.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-02-16   12:09:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Any judge who thinks impeachment is a substitute for Judicial branch prosecution or some sort of an immunity from that and arrest is wrong.

Nowhere in the article does the judge state he thinks it is a substitute. He merely stated his opinion on what he believes will happen when it is brought before the court. That in no way indicates that he is in agreement. Considering the courts are packed with people loyal to the Republican/Democratic organized crime syndicate, it is not an unreasonable assumption on the part of Napolitano. Their first consideration isn't what's best for the country or its citizens but what is best for the syndicate they work for.

The Constitution addresses when and where a Congressional officeholder can or can't be arrested, for instance, but no officeholder has immunity from the law and apprehension for violations of it

By this statement I assume you are talking about the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution. The problem with this line of thinking is that the President is not a Congressional Officeholder. He is an Executive branch office holder. The Speech or Debate Clause specifically states "The Senators and Representatives." It does not mention the Office of the President at all and it cannot be implied because Article 1 describes the powers of Congress and the Legislative branch, not the Executive branch. Executive branch powers are found in Article 2.

The fact of the matter is that the Constitution does not address the issue and the courts have side-stepped it since the very beginning of the country. The closest they've come to it is when the USSC "unanimously rejected any right of a sitting president to quash or to postpone civil suits unconnected with the exercise of presidential authority during tenure as chief executive."

A simple Google search will show that it is nowhere near as cut and dry as you try to make it. This is just your personal opinion on the matter. Personally I agree with you. No one should be above the law, especially the President. Unfortunately, our opinions don't count.

Regardless, the court case is a sham. Like a said, it's nothing more than a pressure release valve so that those who pay attention and care will channel their attention and anger on the court case. Obama will be long gone by the time it is adjudicated - IF it ever is. I firmly believe that the case will dropped if the Republicans win back the Presidency next election cycle.

Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is like calling your neighbor a hermit because he doesn't come over and break your window - unknown

I WITHDRAW MY CONSENT!
Any perceived compliance with unconstitutional “laws” or orders put forth by government employees is NOT recognition of their authority; it is simply the result of carefully calculated submission to an entity exhibiting superior firepower.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2014-02-16   13:02:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I think the fact that we laugh at the Indians over the way New York was purchased for some bobbles and beads compared to today's bargain basement discount giveaway of the whole fucking country is more than hilarious.

Doesn't anyone get it, yet ? The nation is being sold off through debt obligations of all sorts that are IN FACT purely virtual.

Noone, very few "get it". The US Zombies are unable to put 2 and 2 together. They aren't aware that the raping of this country's resources isn't being done on their behalf. Maybe, when Americans find themselves reduced to living as nomads, in what was formerly their country, they'll reflect back upon the misdeeds of their, so-called, leaders (and fellow countrymen).

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it." - Frederic Bastiat

Southern Style  posted on  2014-02-16   14:09:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's so very nice of the Judge to be vocal about Obozo

The Judge is a paid whore of Rupert Murdoch.

He GETS PAID TO SAY SUCH THINGS.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-02-16   17:10:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Wonderful to see'ya here this beautiful Sunday afternoon in CenTex.

Crystal clear and 73, come'on out here.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-02-16   17:39:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Nowhere in the article does the judge state he thinks it is a substitute. He merely stated his opinion on what he believes will happen when it is brought before the court. That in no way indicates that he is in agreement. Considering the courts are packed with people loyal to the Republican/Democratic organized crime syndicate, it is not an unreasonable assumption on the part of Napolitano. Their first consideration isn't what's best for the country or its citizens but what is best for the syndicate they work for.

I especially agree with your last statement in that paragraph. Although I understood all that about Napolitano, the article didn't indicate that he isn't in agreement with what he presumed would happen in court. Can't find anything at the Newsmax or FOX sites of his Cavuto interview to determine what his opinion is on impeachment as a Judiciary substitute or immunity. By saying any judge who thinks so is wrong, I meant to indicate that he wasn't particularly crucial to my summation.

Yes, I was talking about the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution and probably should have reworded the example to be clearer that no officeholder has immunity from the law and apprehension for violations of it, not even Congress which has a conditional, temporary delay stipulation. I agree that the clause doesn't pertain to the Executive branch at all and cannot be implied as if it does. I think the Constitution addresses the issue by the omission of any postponement for that branch.

Glad our views are in agreement on equal and lawful accountability, Presidential or otherwise. Thanks for the link. That the case is a sham and there have been multitudes of concoctions by all of the gov-branches to subvert the Constitution, as well as all the negligence and misconduct by the Legislature on matters of Impeachment...all the more evidence and reason for why we can be sure that the intent of the Framers was not dependence on faulty Federals to impeach or impeach first to render accountability. In my opinion, a court decision should preceed a move to impeach on questions of law and the proper court jurisdiction for the Executive branch during times of war-action would be a Military court but I suppose that much is disputable.

Edited for spelling.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-02-16   18:00:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

In my opinion, a court decision should preceed a move to impeach on questions of law and the proper court jurisdiction for the Executive branch during times of war-action would be a Military court but I suppose that much is disputable.

Am adding here that a court finding of Not Guilty needn't be considered an indisputable block to stop an impeachment process. Courts are often wrong in their law interpretations and decisions, as we know.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2014-02-16   18:31:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]