Framing the Debate (Creating the psychological environment) In "How to Counter Group Manipulation Tactics, the Techniques of Unethical Consensus-building Unmasked," on page 20, Beverly K. Eakman wrote "Framing the debate is key to keeping control of the psychological environment. When you frame the debate, you direct, or drive the discussion; that is, you deflect attention from the real agenda. In effect, you tell people what they are going to think about and for how long." Dr. James Fetzer co-founded, with Professor Steven E. Jones, Scholars for 9/11 Truth. One had to be vetted in order to join. The group accepted me, an ordinary person who had written some articles about 9/11. My ego was inflated; who wouldn't want the designation of a scholar? Before any official reports, on December 27, 2012, Dennis Cimino and Dr. Fetzer co-authored an article for Veteran's Today* (see note at bottom of page), Sandy Hook: Huge Hoax and Anti-Gun “Psy Op” Then on January 30, 2013, six weeks after Sandy Hook, Cimino and Fetzer co-authored The Nexus of Tyranny: The Strategy Behind Tucson, Aurora and Sandy Hook in which they introduced 14 points (see below), which others have adopted. Smallstorm used 12 out of the 14 concepts in her video, "Sofia Smallstorm Unraveling Sandy Hook." I have indicated those in RED text below. Others will predictably embellish what she has disseminated and begin going down multiple rabbit holes. While people might be very sincere, provocateurs often use...
Click for Full Text!