[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Miscellaneous See other Miscellaneous Articles Title: NSA Has An Advice Columnist. (Seriously?) The NSA Has An Advice Columnist. (Seriously?) What if the National Security Agency had its own advice columnist? What would the eavesdroppers ask about? You dont need to guess. An NSA official, writing under the pen name Zelda, has actually served at the agency as a Dear Abby for spies. Her Ask Zelda! columns, distributed on the agencys intranet and accessible only to those with the proper security clearance, are among the documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. The columns are often amusing topics include co-workers falling asleep on the job, sodas being stolen from shared fridges, supervisors not responding to emails, and office-mates who smell bad. But one of the most intriguing involves a letter from an NSA staffer who complains that his (or her) boss is spying on employees. In the letter, which Zelda published in a column on September 9, 2011, the employee calls himself Silenced in SID referring to the Signals Intelligence Directorate, the heart of the NSAs surveillance operations. Zeldas column, headlined Watching Every Word in Snitch City, offers an ironic insight into a spy agency where the spies apparently resent being spied upon. Dear Zelda, the letter of complaint begins: Heres the scenario: when the boss sees co-workers having a quiet conversation, he wants to know what is being said (its mostly work related). He has his designated snitches and expects them to keep him apprised of all the office gossip even calling them at home and expecting a run-down! This puts the designees in a really awkward position; plus, were all afraid any offhand comment or anything said in confidence might be either repeated or misrepresented. Needless to say, this creates a certain amount of tension between team members who normally would get along well, and adds stress in an already stressful atmosphere. There is also an unspoken belief that he will move people to different desks to break up what he perceives as people becoming too chummy. (Its been done under the guise of creating teams.) Surveillance tends to sow suspicion and unease among the people who are being surveilled. Is anyone listening? Who might be the spy among us? What trouble might I get into with the things I say? These questions can eat away at the core of human relations trust. And this is true even at the agency that is conducting the surveillance. The letter continues: We used to be able to joke around a little or talk about our favorite Idol contestant to break the tension, but now were getting more and more skittish about even the most mundane general conversations (Did you have a good weekend?). This was once a very open, cooperative group who worked well together. Now were more suspicious of each other and teamwork is becoming harder. Do you think this was the goal? Silenced in SID Zelda is shocked. Dear Silenced, Wow, that takes intelligence collection in a whole new and inappropriate direction.
. We work in an Agency of secrets, but this kind of secrecy begets more secrecy and it becomes a downward spiral that destroys teamwork. What if you put an end to all the secrecy by bringing it out in the open? Her column reads like an unintended allegory or a cleverly masked one. The NSAs own advice columnist explores the ways in which pervasive surveillance can erode freedom of expression and social cohesion by making it difficult for people to have faith in the privacy of their communications. Zelda continues: You and your co-workers could ask [the supervisor] for a team meeting and lay out the issue as you see it: We feel like you dont trust us and we arent comfortable making small talk anymore for fear of having our desks moved if were seen as being too chummy. (Leave out the part about the snitches.) Tell him how this is hampering collaboration and affecting the work, ask him if he has a problem with the teams behavior, and see what he says.
. Stick to the facts and how you feel, rather than making it about him (Were uncomfortable vs Youre spying on us.). There is no indication that Zelda is trying to make a larger point, but some of what she goes on to propose would be useful for ordinary citizens outside the agency who worry about government and corporate surveillance. If you are bothered by snitches in your office, whether of the unwilling or voluntary variety, the best solution is to keep your behavior above reproach. Be a good performer, watch what you say and do, lock your screen when you step away from your workstation, and keep fodder for wagging tongues (your Viagra stash, photos of your wild-and-crazy girls weekend in Atlantic City) at home or out of sight. If you are put in the unwilling snitch position, I would advise telling your boss that youre not comfortable with the role and to please not ask that of you. Who is Zelda? And who is Silenced in SID? The document provides no information about the identity of the letters author; he or she could be almost anybody at the agency. In a previous column, Zelda explains that Ask Zelda! was initially intended as a forum for supervisors in the Signals Intelligence Directorate, but that non-supervisory workers began submitting questions, too. A bit more is known about Zelda. Her introductory column, in 2010, identifies her as serving for approximately 20 years as a first-line and mid-level Agency supervisor. At the time her column began, she was also an adjunct faculty member of the agencys National Cryptologic School. Her column was part of a regular NSA bulletin called SIDtoday that is distributed on the agencys classified NSAnet. According to traffic statistics, in fact, Ask Zelda! quickly proved to be among the bulletins most popular features. We usually end the calendar year by providing a suspenseful countdown of the top dozen most widely read SIDtoday articles of the year, noted a SIDtoday bulletin on December 27, 2011, but this time around it is not really a nail-biter, because Zelda articles occupied all of the top five slots! Her most popular article that year, about swearing at the NSA, received 19,446 hits. Since SIDtoday is like an online newspaper, we decided to follow the tradition of newspaper write-in advice columnists (such as Dear Abby and Miss Manners) and give me a nom de plume, Zelda writes in advance of the first anniversary of her column. I like it because using a pen name creates a persona whos more memorable and accessible than Ask Mary Smith, Chief of S456. Plus it creates a certain mystique about Zelda
shes bigger than life. It also prevents me from getting inundated with hate mail and requests for advice outside of the column. Zelda can be a church lady. Her first column addressed employee attire in summer months, and she was not pleased. Somehow, shorts and flip-flops dont exactly convey the image of a fierce SIGINT warrior, she writes. Not only is beach attire unprofessional in the workplace, but in certain cases it can be downright distracting to co-workers (if you get my drift). She recommends that offenders, who might be just out of college and not know any better, should be told to dress in a professional manner even when it feels like a swamp outside. This column received 9,186 hits by the end of 2010 placing it number four on the list of most-read SIDtoday articles for the year. But on privacy, Zelda is surprisingly liberal, given that the agency where she works spies on vast numbers of private phone calls, emails, texts, chats, status updates, webcams and address books. In a column titled, Guilty Until Proven Innocent?, Zelda responds to an NSA worker who goes by the pen name Innocent Bystander and who explains that a colleague has filed an anonymous complaint about their bosses, calling them abysmal and idiotic. Unfortunately, everyone believes that Innocent Bystander has written the complaint, and as a result, The chill Im feeling is pretty severe! Anonymous complaints should be discouraged, Innocent Bystander says, so that innocent parties do not come under suspicion. You make a good case against anonymous mailbags, Zelda replies, but a lot of people wont give feedback at all if they know it will be attributed to them. I believe scathing comments such as your co-workers are the exception and not the rule. Her response to Silenced in SID does not acknowledge the irony or hypocrisy of an employee at a spy agency complaining about being spied on. But Zelda directly addresses the long-lasting effects of inappropriate surveillance. Trust is hard to rebuild once it has been broken, she observes. Your work center may take time to heal after this deplorable practice is discontinued. https://firstlook.or...nist-seriously/ Reply: Mike Wolf 12 Mar 2014 at 6:12 pm This article provides some interesting insight to one properly aware or otherwise trained in psychology and human behavior. The initial letter discussed, related to internal spying, most likely demonstrates a culture that is both inspired by, and inspires, the spying by the agency on American citizens. Interestingly, Zelda, likely not a person but a committee, provides for an interesting take on the agencys attitude towards mass surveillance: as long as you have nothing to hide, you have no reason to fear every word, deed, and thought being monitored. So here we have an agency that spies on Americans each other. This inspires some to spy on each other within the NSA . And when this is discovered by some who actually engage in the act of spying on Americans; they are treated by their superiors the way we are treated by the agency. This both justifies the surveillance, and simultaneously causes the individual operators to seek a perverted and uniquely American form of vengeance; that of misdirected payback to a perceived lower echelon of an internally created hierachy. In other words, the people who spy are being spied on, and in response to being spied on, exceed their mandates in spying as revenge for their being spied on. This behavior is quite readily exemplified in criminal justice in America. Here we have a law enforcement paradigm that obviously does not serve the will of the people. We know that law enforcement is universally corrupt; yet because law enforcement mistreats us, we then use law enforcement to pay back those around us who wrong us. The very nature of human behavior has been fundamentally altered by corruption. And if we dont think that such actions as mass surveillance of Americans can cause immediate problems; lets examine the killing of Osama Bin Laden, and how it emboldened law enforcement to act as judge, jury, and executioner, starting most prominently with Christopher Dorner. What I wouldnt give to have access to those documents. As a victim of NSA rogue surveillance, and the rash of b.s. I get whenever I try to tell people; I am quite anxious to prove to Americans what I already know: that the NSA has become a rogue agency of children who act as no more than a massive network of internet trolls who have singlehandedly brought down the entire global communication infrastructures effectiveness through their clumsy efforts to play internet gods. The only possible solution to this problem is the complete and total gutting of the NSA and revelation of all internal documents. Full and complete disclosure. In other words, the truth shall set us all free. Edited by Zharkov, Poster Comment: Zelda is a popular Jewish name; how appropriate. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
No seriously? SEARIOUSLY?! LOL! ______________________________________ Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
[Register]
|