[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

"Gestapo" Müller - Hunting Hitler's Secret Police Chief

How Michelle Obama Could Become Democrats' Nominee after Biden's Terrible Debate, with Steve Bannon

Was This Lethal Spitfire Ace Killed by His Own Tactics?

Welsh Police Pay Home Visit To Man For Displaying Reform UK Political Sign

Liz Harrington Drops a BOMBSHELL on How Georgia Was Stolen

Trudeau govt to make all bathrooms in Parliament buildings GENDER NEUTRAL

French official admits censorship is needed for government to control public opinion

Bill Maher Predicts Trump Victory: The Left Is Aggressively Anti-Common Sense

Google is suppressing Blaze Media. Heres how you can help.

Large-scale prisons being secretly erected in all 50 states will they be used to house illegals or force Americans into concentration camps?

Hezbollah is ready to confront Israels military, with Jon Elmer

Balloons Land in Southern Lebanon, Warning Locals the Land Belongs to Jews

German Politician Hit With Hate Crime Investigation For Demanding Migrant Criminals Be Deported

DNC Caught Funneling Millions to Law Firms Involved in Unprecedented Lawfare Campaign Against Trump

Here Are The 20 Biggest Whoppers Biden Told During His Debate With Trump

NYC to ban cellphones in public schools.

New York Times Columnists Turn On Biden After Disastrous Debate Performance

8 Armed Men With Venezuelan Accents Violently Rob Denver Jewelry Store

Uvalde Police School Chief Indicted, Arrested Over Response To 2022 Shooting

Greetings from the Horse

Tonight confirmed every Democrats worst fear.

Five Women Soon To Die In 1928

How Trump Can Lose The Debate

Tucker Carlson Savagely Dismantles ‘Dumb’ and ‘Stupid’ Far-Left Reporter at Australian Freedom Conference

James Clapper, Mr. October Surprise: How Obama's Intel Czar Rigged 2016 And 2020 Debates Against Trump

Biden Campaign Balks Wont Commit to Drug Test

S-500 Prometheus: Designed To Kill Stealth Jets, ICBMs

The US military chases shiny new things and the ranks suffer

USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Now in the Med, USS Theodore Roosevelt Heads to the Middle East

Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi mocks Democrat judge acting like a ‘confused simpleton’


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: One Word Defines U.S. Foreign Policy: Hubris
Source: The Contrary Perspective
URL Source: http://contraryperspective.com/2014 ... nes-u-s-foreign-policy-hubris/
Published: Apr 4, 2014
Author: W.J. Astore
Post Date: 2014-04-07 22:19:52 by X-15
Keywords: None
Views: 162
Comments: 11

When Hannah Arendt, the famous German-American political philosopher, criticized American involvement in the Vietnam War, she said that our foreign policy “experts” fell prey to using excessive means to achieve minor aims in a region of marginal interest to the United States. You could say the same of most of America’s foreign interventions since 1945. We are a superpower with a boundless propensity for meddling in world affairs. We waste enormous amounts of money and resources intervening in areas that are of marginal importance to our national security.

There are many reasons for these wasteful interventions, of course. The military-industrial-Congressional complex plays its role. Presidents love to intervene as a sign of “strength.” Natural resources, especially oil, are usually in play. The usual motives, in short: profit, power, greed.

But perhaps the root cause of our mistakes can be traced to hubris, our prideful belief that we can remake other societies and peoples in our image. Our hubris leads us to undervalue legitimate cultural differences, and to underestimate the difficulties involved in bridging those distances. Because we underestimate the difficulties, we rush in with money and troops, only to find that the problems we encounter — and often exacerbate — are not amenable to being solved with money and troops. Nevertheless, once we’ve committed our prestige, we believe that we can’t withdraw without losing face. So we commit even more money and troops and prestige, until our folly can no longer be denied, even to ourselves. After which, sadly, we usually search for scapegoats.

Rarely do we stop to think that some problems simply can’t be solved with massive infusions of money and troops. Indeed, infusions of the same often exacerbate the very problems we claim we’re trying to solve.

The way out, to paraphrase Arendt, is to commit only those means necessary to secure our major aims in regions of vital interest to the U.S.

Such an approach requires humility as well as moderation. Our foreign policy types will need to stop strutting the world stage as if they own it. Our leaders will need to stop vamping like Gloria Swanson in Sunset Boulevard, declaiming “I am big. It’s the pictures that got small.” (If only they had her style.)

“Look at them in the front offices. The masterminds!” Yes, Gloria Swanson had it right. Our foreign policy “masterminds” need to learn some humility. Either that, or America will be among the smashed idols of history.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#1. To: X-15 (#0)

But perhaps the root cause of our mistakes can be traced to hubris, our prideful belief that we can remake other societies and peoples in our image. Our hubris leads us to undervalue legitimate cultural differences, and to underestimate the difficulties involved in bridging those distances.

"we can remake other societies and peoples in our image"

That was NEVER the intent. It is perhaps the surface observation, but never intent. Even our government is not that stupid.

We must realize, in the past 100 years, this world has needed, and will ALWAYS need someone to referee the numerous forces at work on this planet, good and evil and in between.

Remove this country from that job, absolve ourselves of all past blame, then consider what country, what force would fill that void????????????????

Cynicom  posted on  2014-04-07   22:39:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

Unfortunately, the do-gooder-neocon lunatics are running the asylum in D.C. and the hubris is strong with them:

"We are, in other words, not a nation based on ethnicity, but on beliefs, and not coincidentally, that is why we attract people of all ethnicities and they become proud Americans.... When we have used our power, however, we have done it for good." -Jim DeMint

"It is the threat of the use of force [against Iraq] and our line-up there that is going to put force behind the diplomacy. But if we have to use force, it is because we are America; we are the indispensable nation. We stand tall and we see further than other countries into the future, and we see the danger here to all of us."

-former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright

X-15  posted on  2014-04-07   22:45:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: X-15 (#2)

World society is rotten to the core.

Our government is a corrupt criminal enterprise, has been since the Civil War.

However, both Japan and Germany in the 1930s often used the term "New Order" for the world. Sounds familiar. In fact there are photos of Japanese propaganda leaflets and posters that proclaim the NEW ORDER.

Yes, we deserve all the blame headed our way, however, we have to be honest enough to understand and accept, if it were not us, it would have been someone else.

On the world stage who is "else"??????

On the world stage, last 100 years, Japan, Germany, Soviet Union and now China. Pick any one of them and consider, would the world now be a better place, or worse place?

Cynicom  posted on  2014-04-07   23:07:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Cynicom (#3)

Germany

I don't think Germany would have threatened to invade America, but they did have plans for long-range rockets to bombard the East Coast, and they would have eventually used nukes if America couldn't have come to an uneasy truce that would have confined our activities right here at home in North America. That's also assuming that Japan would have stopped their Pacific campaign at Hawaii, too. They certainly didn't want to try to invade the West Coast.

My .02, would that world scenario be any worse than the one we currently live in??

X-15  posted on  2014-04-07   23:16:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 4.

#5. To: X-15 (#4) (Edited)

My .02, would that world scenario be any worse than the one we currently live in??

Indeed it would, most indeed.

That is the scales which properly determine whether our "bullying and war mongering" is better or worse than that of someone else.

The prize example is Western Europe. They are free today because of us, not once but twice within the realm of WWII. Once from the actual clutches of fascist Germany, the second time from the clutches of the fascist Soviet Union, during the cold war.

During the 1930s, Stalin was building an army suited to his desire to take all of Western Europe to the English Channel. His only impediment was Germany. He knew they would fight, the Jews were hell bent on taking Germany into the Communist camp, Stalin could have walked to the Channel.

However Hitler took over in 1932 and the Jews ran for their lives. Stalin lost that chance but received another one at end of WW2 when he sat in Berlin, a cakewalk to the Channel. The US and the US alone stopped that.

Thus in 2014 we are still sitting in Western Europe. Right or wrong, we must consider the alternative fairly.

Total isolation would never work.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-04-08 02:06:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]