See other Religion Articles
Title: 'Gospel of Jesus' Wife' Papyrus Is Ancient, Not Fake, Scientists And Scholars Say
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/ ... 12.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
Published: Apr 10, 2014
Author: Karen L. King
Post Date: 2014-04-10 19:24:49 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 226
Comments: 9
Jesus Wife The Gospel of Jesus Wife Gospel of Jesus's Wife Gospel of Jesus Wife Roger Bagnall Jesus Wife Test Coptic Papyrus Religion and Sexuality Was Jesus Married Jesus Married Catholic Church Historical Jesus Video Christianity Institute for the Study of the Ancient World Jesus of Nazareth Jesus Jesus Wife Papyrus Tested Christianity Jesus Celibacy An ancient, business-card-sized papyrus fragment that appears to quote Jesus Christ discussing his wife is real, Harvard University announced Thursday. The fragment caused international uproar when it was revealed by a Harvard historian in September 2012, with prominent academics and the Vatican swiftly deeming it a forgery. Harvard officials said scientists both within and outside the university extensively tested the papyrus and carbon ink of the badly aged fragment, dubbed the "Gospel of Jesus' Wife." The document, written in Coptic, a language of ancient Egyptian Christians, is made up of eight mostly legible dark lines on the front and six barely legible faded lines on the back. The handwriting and grammar were also examined over the last year and a half to confirm its authenticity. Scientists have concluded the fragment dates back to at least the sixth to ninth centuries, and possibly as far back as the fourth century. The document was never meant to prove Jesus was married, Harvard Divinity School professor Karen L. King emphasized Thursday. Instead, she argued, it's meant to highlight that some early Christians may have believed Jesus was married. The distinction is significant because debates over sexuality and marriage have dominated contemporary discussions about Christianity; the Catholic Church cites Jesus' celibacy as one reason its priests must not have sex or marry. "The main topic of the fragment is to affirm that women who are mothers and wives can be disciples of Jesus -- a topic that was hotly debated in early Christianity as celibate virginity increasingly became highly valued," King, whose specialties include Coptic literature, Gnosticism and women in the Bible, said in a statement Thursday. "This gospel fragment provides a reason to reconsider what we thought we knew by asking what the role claims of Jesus' marital status played historically in early Christian controversies over marriage, celibacy, and family." The legible lines on the front of the artifact seem to form a broken conversation between Jesus and his disciples. The fourth line of the text says, "Jesus said to them, my wife." Line 5 says "... she will be able to be my disciple," while the line before the "wife" quote has Jesus saying "Mary is worthy of it" and line 7 says, “As for me, I dwell with her in order to ..."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Ada (#0)
Uhhhhhhhh....
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
corruptissima re publica plurimae leges - Tacitus
Jesus said more and and had more written by those who actually knew or were related to him in the texts that were excluded from the NT Cannon. What was chosen was political,giving power to the church at every turn, and what was excluded was both spiritual and compassionate beyond what the average Christian has ever read. Why people act as if the books chosen are all that there was or even all that is correct baffles me. It should be of no surprise that Jesus would marry. Getting married is not a sin or an abomination, it is natural. Why this is even controversial is beyond me. Sheesh, the forced "celibacy" of Catholic priests has turned out to be the abomination! " If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11 "Life's tough, and even tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne
If a man burn, let him marry. Sounds reasonable to me. “The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
You'd never make it as a Southern Baptist ;)
#2. To: Lod (#1)
#3. To: Ada (#0)
the Catholic Church cites Jesus' celibacy as one reason its priests must not have sex or marry.
#4. To: abraxas (#3)
#5. To: abraxas (#3)
-Alex Kurtagic
#6. To: X-15 (#5)
Nope.....too may questions, too curious, too willing to point out contradiction, too inclined to point out hypocrisy, and far too non-conformist to ever get a seat on that pew. You'd never make it as a Southern Baptist ;)
" If you cannot govern yourself, you will be governed by assholes. " Randge, Poet de Forum, 1/11/11
"Life's tough, and even tougher if you're stupid." --John Wayne
#7. To: Ada (#0)
WHO the heck are Harvard to pronounce anything about religion seeing as they are atheist fag enablers? If it is from 700 it is heretical in origin and thus has NOTHING to do with an historical Christ. Wait until they produce the Manicheans 'gospels' to prove Christ was gay, or liked boys or.....a lot of this 'pop' nonsense is based on the ambiguity of Greek and the fact that one can mistranslate it to suit almost any agenda if the audience is not keen to the game.
-Alex Kurtagic
#8. To: X-15 (#7)
They are proclaiming the papyrus authentic but not necessarily what was written on it. Note that the language was Coptic, not Amamaic or Greek. WHO the heck are Harvard to pronounce anything about religion seeing as they are atheist fag enablers?
#9. To: abraxas (#3)
The Roman Catholic church didn't insist on celibacy until around the 8th century. Had its reasons, I suppose.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest