[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: Columnist Admits Being Paid, Resigns From Cato Institute…(Totally discredited Institute, shill for Government) Columnist Admits Being Paid, Resigns From Cato Institute
New York Times | ANNE E. KORNBLUT | Posted December 17, 2005 12:05 AM READ MORE: Jack Abramoff cato.gif From http://cato.org WASHINGTON, Dec. 16 - A senior scholar at the Cato Institute, the respected libertarian research organization, has resigned after revelations that he took payments from the lobbyist Jack Abramoff in exchange for writing columns favorable to his clients. The scholar, Doug Bandow, who wrote a column for the Copley News Service in addition to serving as a Cato fellow, acknowledged to executives at the organization that he had taken money from Mr. Abramoff after he was confronted about the payments by a reporter from BusinessWeek Online. Read Whole Story Send to a friend Post a Comment Related News Stories * Radical Right Columnist Paid Off By GOP Lobbyist Abramoff To Write Favorable Columns About His Clients
* Right-Wing Scholars Took Money From Abramoff For Favorable Columns
* Christian Conservative Ralph Reed: Im Sorry I Worked With Abramoff
But Im Not Returning The Money Yet
Related Blog Posts * Jane Smiley: A Ten-Step Program * Marty Kaplan: Pundit Payola, Continued * Matt Brown: A Conversation with MyDD Posted Comments : Crash and burn folks, the industry better come clean. This is THE payola scandal of all time. If Abramoff got caught by being stupid a lot of smart people are getting away with it. Crash and burn. Posted by: SamEllison on December 17, 2005 at 12:47am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] "He acknowledges he made a lapse in judgment," said Jamie Dettmer, director of communications at Cato." A lapse in judgement? That's a masterpiece of an understatement. This is not an "oops". Posted by: CharlesMac on December 17, 2005 at 01:14am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Just rename this collection of whores and Bushpigs the Paidoff Institute. Posted by: MoeLarryAndJesus on December 17, 2005 at 01:21am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Or they could just switch two letters, become the Taco Institute, and sell shitty food instead of shitty propaganda. Posted by: MoeLarryAndJesus on December 17, 2005 at 02:05am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Is it a surprise that our society has bred those who will do anything for money? Posted by: JeffDeVore on December 17, 2005 at 02:22am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] MONEY, what a hit Don't give me any of that Do-goodey good bullshit Posted by: wndrwrthg on December 17, 2005 at 02:39am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Good thing we're as free as we are, and we don't have to indulge in propaganda, eh? Is there no end to this crap? Posted by: viejorojo on December 17, 2005 at 02:41am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Gee, I am really surprised. Derring-do at a bona fide 'think tank.' Who woulda thunk it. You know, you look up any of the 'so-called' think-tanks, Cato, AEI, any of them, and you go to their "About Us" link and it's just the smarmiest, flag-wavingest, strike up the band type of teary eyed America-or-Nobody sales pitch that says high and mighty things about how supportive their outfit is about Americanism. AND THEY ARE NOTHING BUT RABID PROPAGANDA OUTLETS FOR THE RIGHT WINGERS OF OUR WORLD!! It just stinks, but there they are selling the 24/7/365 campaign agenda for whoever is 'running' on their behalf. What a bunch of creeps. Posted by: BrickSykes on December 17, 2005 at 03:00am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] http://fusioner.proboards60.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1131129004 We ^ Need ^ _YOUR_ ^ Letters ^ HERE!!! Please participate in a grassroots media campaign. Our government has turned against it's citizens. Our press has failed us. These are the times when the _PEOPLE_ have to stand up and speak clearly. LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD!!! Posted by: Fusioner on December 17, 2005 at 03:37am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Shit that sucks, a libertarian taking money from repug, well at least the scumbag resigned. Posted by: daemon on December 17, 2005 at 03:52am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Moe, Larry, and Jesus notes: "Or they could just switch two letters, become the Taco Institute" They already are. They advocate unrestricted immigration from Mexico, to drive down labor costs. And that's a "shitty" deal for American workers. Posted by: Blueto on December 17, 2005 at 03:54am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] One has to think if Iraqis are reading the top fold of US papers, they're left to think, "250+ years to get it right and the end result is THIS?" Chimp and his boys are "partying like it's 1899." Posted by: Maxx61 on December 17, 2005 at 06:15am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] I thought Libertarians believed that people should be free to chose whatever path they wanted to take? I guess "Libertarian" now means, available for the highest bidder. Whore! Posted by: Dendroica on December 17, 2005 at 06:33am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Question of the Day how can you tell A who is a right winger in a crowd. He's the one with his hand out. Posted by: nick1936 on December 17, 2005 at 07:16am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] These Reichwing "Think Tanks" have their home coordinates off - they're 70 years late and not in Germany... What a fantastic world it would be without the reptilian brain reichwingers sparing nothing to move everything backwards and downwards. Posted by: willfarnaby on December 17, 2005 at 07:24am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Just your every day feeding at the PIG TROUGH. Posted by: Elucid on December 17, 2005 at 08:38am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] "What Liberal Media?" by Eric Alterman. It'a all there. These Stink-Tanks have been funded by ultra-wealthy far-right radicals (Paul Weyrich, for example) for thirty-odd years, lending a respectable veneer to nut-job fascist policies. It's time their role in influencing the debate in favour of their super-rich benefactors was brought into the light. Posted by: PeteCO on December 17, 2005 at 09:36am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] -- I thought Libertarians believed that people should be free to chose whatever path they wanted to take? Whore! Posted by: Dendroica -- they do Dendroica ... freedom's biggest advocates traditionally ... "individual liberty, limited government, free markets and peace" http://www.cato.org/ this sucks ... "lapse of judgment" ... give us a break ... whore is right ... freak'n "Bush Republicans" (thank you Thalia) corrupt everything they touch Posted by: Nano on December 17, 2005 at 10:35am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Bandow and Ferrara are just whores. Judy Miller read this article and screamed, "I could've gotten paid!?!?" Posted by: Ranman on December 17, 2005 at 10:37am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Let's see, a lapse of judgement every day for about 10 years, yup, sounds like a scholar alright. By the way Ranman, Judy Miller DID get paid. Without her "inside sources", she would be nothing. Posted by: Hank on December 17, 2005 at 10:42am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] I'm shocked, shocked! C'mon, any journalist with an IQ higher than the room temp would have nothing positive to write about the Chimp or this terminally corrupt administration unless their ears were clogged by hundred dollar bills. Posted by: Lewis on December 17, 2005 at 12:55pm Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Not only was he a whore, he was a cheap whore. Posted by: LostCause on December 17, 2005 at 03:08pm Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Not only did he act as a hooker, he was a cheap hooker. Posted by: LostCause on December 17, 2005 at 03:09pm Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] "A senior scholar at the Cato Institute, the respected libertarian research organization" Correction: the FORMERLY respected libertarian research organization. Think-tanks need to go. They're whores and partisans, not 'thinkers'. We can thank the think-tank ANSER for Homeland Security, for instance. Posted by: Sower on December 17, 2005 at 04:39pm Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] The definition of conservative journalist is "Republican whore." Posted by: ladyrantsalot on December 17, 2005 at 08:40pm Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] goddamn the right wing has no ethics. It's scary. Deliciously corruptable are this type. Posted by: max on December 17, 2005 at 10:33pm Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Who says the Cato Intitute is 'respected'? Respected by whom? Certainly, it does not deserve the respect of any of the progressives who read the Huffington Post! It's just one of panopoly of rightwing thinktanks that were created in order to manipulate the media. Posted by: socialdemocracynow on December 18, 2005 at 12:12am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] "Our scholarship is not for sale," Mr. Dettmer said. I thought libertarians didn't beleive in regulations. So why not "sell" you work to the highest bidder? If you don't practice what you preach, then is there a flaw in you logic? Or are ethics above economics? Posted by: mormon4truth on December 18, 2005 at 05:21am Is this comment abusive? spam? [flag it] Read Whole Story Send to a friend Post a Comment Top Posts * Jane Smiley: A Ten-Step Program * Bill Maher: Not Fooling Anyone * Carol Platt Liebau: The News That's Unfit to Print Top News * Homeland Security Agents Questioned Student Who Sought Maos Little Red Book For College Course
* NY Times Editorial: Bush "Secretly And Recklessly Expanded The Govt.'s Powers In Dangerous And Unnecessary Ways"
* Congress Talks Of Stepping Up Bush Oversight
* Christian Group Protests At Wal-Mart Store Against Its Use Of Happy Holidays
* Wash. Post Editorial: "The Tools Of Foreign Intelligence Are Not Consistent With A Democratic Society"
SEND A NEWS TIP Sources * Breaking News o Agence France-Press o Associated Press o Dow Jones o Itar-Tass o Kyodo o Reuters o UPI o Xinhua * U.S. Newspapers o Atlanta Journal-Constitution o Boston Globe o Chicago Sun-Times o Chicago Tribune o The Christian Science Monitor o Chronicle of Higher Education o Denver Post o Los Angeles Times o Miami Herald o New York Daily News o New York Times o San Francisco Chronicle o Seattle Post-Intelligencer o St. Petersburg Times o USA Today o Wall Street Journal o Washington Post * Intl. Newspapers o Daily Standard (UK) o Financial Times (UK) o The Globe and Mail (Canada) o Guardian (UK) o Hindustan Times (India) o Independent (UK) o International Herald Tribune o Irish Times o The Scotsman o Telegraph (UK) o Times (UK) o Times of India * Television News o ABC o CBS o CNN o C-SPAN o FOX o PBS NewsHour o MSNBC * Intl. News Networks o ABC (Australia) o Al Jazeera o BBC o CBC (Canada) o Deutsche Welle (EU) o Sky News (UK) * News Search Engines o AOL o AltaVista o Google o Newsbot o Topix o Yahoo! * Full Blogroll Login to Huffington Post | Make Huff Post your Home Page | RSS/XML | S
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: tom007 (#0)
It's all about the $$$.
Good lord.. money sure talks doesnt it.. how far does this Abramoff scandal reach?..
Click to see: Making a difference in Iraq
The scholar, Doug Bandow There's Abramoff again.
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|