See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: Gene Mutation Behind Light Skin
Source:
The Washington Post
URL Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy ... /12/15/AR2005121501728_pf.html
Published: Dec 16, 2005
Author: Rick Weiss
Post Date: 2005-12-18 11:00:56 by christine
Keywords: Mutation, Behind, Light
Views: 154
Comments: 21
Scientists said yesterday that they have discovered a tiny genetic mutation that largely explains the first appearance of white skin in humans tens of thousands of years ago, a finding that helps solve one of biology's most enduring mysteries and illuminates one of humanity's greatest sources of strife. The work suggests that the skin-whitening mutation occurred by chance in a single individual after the first human exodus from Africa, when all people were brown-skinned. That person's offspring apparently thrived as humans moved northward into what is now Europe, helping to give rise to the lightest of the world's races. Leaders of the study, at Penn State University, warned against interpreting the finding as a discovery of "the race gene." Race is a vaguely defined biological, social and political concept, they noted, and skin color is only part of what race is -- and is not. In fact, several scientists said, the new work shows just how small a biological difference is reflected by skin color. The newly found mutation involves a change of just one letter of DNA code out of the 3.1 billion letters in the human genome -- the complete instructions for making a human being. "It's a major finding in a very sensitive area," said Stephen Oppenheimer, an expert in anthropological genetics at Oxford University, who was not involved in the work. "Almost all the differences used to differentiate populations from around the world really are skin deep." The work raises a raft of new questions -- not least of which is why white skin caught on so thoroughly in northern climes once it arose. Some scientists suggest that lighter skin offered a strong survival advantage for people who migrated out of Africa by boosting their levels of bone-strengthening vitamin D; others have posited that its novelty and showiness simply made it more attractive to those seeking mates. The work also reveals for the first time that Asians owe their relatively light skin to different mutations. That means that light skin arose independently at least twice in human evolution, in each case affecting populations with the facial and other traits that today are commonly regarded as the hallmarks of Caucasian and Asian races. Several sociologists and others said they feared that such revelations might wrongly overshadow the prevailing finding of genetics over the past 10 years: that the number of DNA differences between races is tiny compared with the range of genetic diversity found within any single racial group. Even study leader Keith Cheng said he was at first uncomfortable talking about the new work, fearing that the finding of such a clear genetic difference between people of African and European ancestries might reawaken discredited assertions of other purported inborn differences between races -- the most long-standing and inflammatory of those being intelligence. "I think human beings are extremely insecure and look to visual cues of sameness to feel better, and people will do bad things to people who look different," Cheng said. The discovery, described in today's issue of the journal Science, was an unexpected outgrowth of studies Cheng and his colleagues were conducting on inch-long zebra fish, which are popular research tools for geneticists and developmental biologists. Having identified a gene that, when mutated, interferes with its ability to make its characteristic black stripes, the team scanned human DNA databases to see if a similar gene resides in people. To their surprise, they found virtually identical pigment-building genes in humans, chickens, dogs, cows and many others species, an indication of its biological value. They got a bigger surprise when they looked in a new database comparing the genomes of four of the world's major racial groups. That showed that whites with northern and western European ancestry have a mutated version of the gene. Skin color is a reflection of the amount and distribution of the pigment melanin, which in humans protects against damaging ultraviolet rays but in other species is also used for camouflage or other purposes. The mutation that deprives zebra fish of their stripes blocks the creation of a protein whose job is to move charged atoms across cell membranes, an obscure process that is crucial to the accumulation of melanin inside cells. Humans of European descent, Cheng's team found, bear a slightly different mutation that hobbles the same protein with similar effect. The defect does not affect melanin deposition in other parts of the body, including the hair and eyes, whose tints are under the control of other genes. A few genes have previously been associated with human pigment disorders -- most notably those that, when mutated, lead to albinism, an extreme form of pigment loss. But the newly found glitch is the first found to play a role in the formation of "normal" white skin. The Penn State team calculates that the gene, known as slc24a5, is responsible for about one-third of the pigment loss that made black skin white. A few other as-yet-unidentified mutated genes apparently account for the rest. Although precise dating is impossible, several scientists speculated on the basis of its spread and variation that the mutation arose between 20,000 and 50,000 years ago. That would be consistent with research showing that a wave of ancestral humans migrated northward and eastward out of Africa about 50,000 years ago. Unlike most mutations, this one quickly overwhelmed its ancestral version, at least in Europe, suggesting it had a real benefit. Many scientists suspect that benefit has to do with vitamin D, made in the body with the help of sunlight and critical to proper bone development. Sun intensity is great enough in equatorial regions that the vitamin can still be made in dark-skinned people despite the ultraviolet shielding effects of melanin. In the north, where sunlight is less intense and cold weather demands that more clothing be worn, melanin's ultraviolet shielding became a liability, the thinking goes. Today that solar requirement is largely irrelevant because many foods are supplemented with vitamin D. Some scientists said they suspect that white skin's rapid rise to genetic dominance may also be the product of "sexual selection," a phenomenon of evolutionary biology in which almost any new and showy trait in a healthy individual can become highly prized by those seeking mates, perhaps because it provides evidence of genetic innovativeness. Cheng and co-worker Victor A. Canfield said their discovery could have practical spinoffs. A gene so crucial to the buildup of melanin in the skin might be a good target for new drugs against melanoma, for example, a cancer of melanin cells in which slc24a5 works overtime. But they and others agreed that, for better or worse, the finding's most immediate impact may be an escalating debate about the meaning of race. Recent revelations that all people are more than 99.9 percent genetically identical has proved that race has almost no biological validity. Yet geneticists' claims that race is a phony construct have not rung true to many nonscientists -- and understandably so, said Vivian Ota Wang of the National Human Genome Research Institute in Bethesda. "You may tell people that race isn't real and doesn't matter, but they can't catch a cab," Ota Wang said. "So unless we take that into account it makes us sound crazy."
Poster Comment: we're only white by chance??? mmmmhmmm..sure.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: christine (#0)
This does make you sound crazy Wang. ...they can't catch a cab?
Mutation = Change Change = Evolution
"You may tell people that race isn't real and doesn't matter, but they can't catch a cab," Ota Wang said.
#2. To: christine (#0)
 | What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?. |
#3. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#2)
Change = Evolution That is bullshit. God made us with all the genes needed for different skin colors. The Bible is true. Evilution is the dream of evil men to try and discredit Gods true word found in the Bible!
Mutation = Change
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
#4. To: A K A Stone (#3)
Hey... You're living proof that evolution works. I mean, where else has anyone else seen a jackass type?
That is bullshit. God made us with all the genes needed for different skin colors. The Bible is true. Evilution is the dream of evil men to try and discredit Gods true word found in the Bible!
| What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?. |
#5. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#4)
Can't refute, so you attack someone telling the truth. How sad.
Hey... You're living proof that evolution works. I mean, where else has anyone else seen a jackass type?
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it - Thomas Jefferson
#6. To: christine (#0)
IOW, don't pay any attention to the signal lurking within the noise -- especially you, you white devil. Granted, not quite the same as the attitude taken by SETI researchers...
Recent revelations that all people are more than 99.9 percent genetically identical has proved that race has almost no biological validity.
Q: Whatever happened to live-and-let-live?
A: Business will be business.
#7. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#4)
*Standing ovation*
"The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all." - John F. Kennedy
#8. To: christine (#0)
The work suggests, but does not conclusively conclude, which makes their work nothing more than a theory.
The work suggests that the skin-whitening mutation occurred by chance in a single individual after the first human exodus from Africa, when all people were brown-skinned.
"The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all." - John F. Kennedy
#9. To: A K A Stone (#3)
Um, evolution is a fact. Ask anyone who has a multi-drug resistant strain of TB or anyone who is HIV-positive, or anyone who has ever gotten a flu shot. Regardless of what created anything or sparked the first bit of life on this planet, change happens, whether you think the planet was created billions of years ago or just a few thousand. Change, passed on to the next generation IS evolution. Ask anyone promoting Intelligent Design. They'll tell you that what I just said is what they claim as well. Evolution is how things work, not a description of the beginning.
#10. To: A K A Stone (#5)
Well let's see here, talk about someone who can't refute. Let me think about this, where's your evidence that human beings Didn't or haven't evolved? Second, where's your evidence that other animals haven't evolved? Where's your evidence of this so called God of yours? You know, the one that chooses on group of people, over all, regardless? Like I want to believe in a religion that says a piece of land, and a group of people are God's chosen ones. Considering how vast the universe is, you'd think that God might have bigger things to worry about than a shitty area, with a bunch of people whose motivations are dubious at best. If there is a God, and he's that petty, that's not something I want to believe in, regardless of that idiocy you try to preach. I'm not anti Christian, I am ANTI-IDIOT. You ARE indeed an idiot. You weren't attacked, you were told the truth, and the truth hurts.
| What's that Mr. Nipples? You want me to ask the nice lady about her rack?. |
#11. To: mirage (#9)
I'd dissent on that.. An improvement passed on is evolution. Otherwise you're passing on a mutation or something undesirable? That could legitimately be seen as "devolution" and is really nothing more than genetically propagating an abnormality.
Change, passed on to the next generation IS evolution.
“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” President Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”
#12. To: mirage (#9)
Oh & PS: Please don't think I've been terse or ignored PM's. It's been crazy lately (Christmas sucks, allot) and when I responded, I wanted to take the time to respond in a worthwhile manner.
“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” President Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”
#13. To: Jhoffa_ (#11)
Could be undesirable outside of the area, like sickle cell anemia. Its an improvement in the tropics, but a detriment outside of there. How would that be classified?
Otherwise you're passing on a mutation or something undesirable?
#14. To: mirage (#13)
I dunno... but if it's detrimental, I wouldn't call it evolution.
How would that be classified?
“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” President Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”
#15. To: Jhoffa_ (#14)
Well, many things are detrimental outside of the normal environment for whatever critter you're looking at, but inside the normal environment, there may be a definite advantage. Thick fur in a tropical environment would be a disadvantage, but in an Arctic environment, a definite plus. For sickle cell anemia [bad example but was the only thing that popped to mind at the time] - it causes problems with oxygen transfer, but renders people less suceptible to malaria and thus, able to survive to an age where they can reproduce, thereby passing on that particular trait. People without sickle cell tend to fall victim to malaria and die early. This one is a tradeoff. People with sickle cell live longer in malarial-infested areas, thus surviving to reproduce, but it is of no advantage anywhere else. Does that help clarify any?
if it's detrimental, I wouldn't call it evolution
#16. To: mirage, Jhoffa_, Tauzero (#15)
Defect? Why is it only called a defect when it helps successful mutants?
Humans of European descent, Cheng's team found, bear a slightly different mutation that hobbles the same protein with similar effect. The defect does not affect melanin deposition in other parts of the body, including the hair and eyes, whose tints are under the control of other genes.
And I'm optimistic. See, I think you can be realistic and optimistic at the same time. I'm optimistic we'll achieve -- I know we won't achieve if we send mixed signals. I know we're not going to achieve our objective if we send mixed signals - gwbush
#17. To: mirage (#15)
Granted, there are pro's and there are con's.. If it's a negative, I couldn't call it evolution.. "Devolution" or mutation seems more the term.
Well, many things are detrimental outside of the normal environment for whatever critter you're looking at, but inside the normal environment, there may be a definite advantage.
“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” President Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”
#18. To: Dakmar (#16)
Class envy..
“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” President Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”
#19. To: Jhoffa_ (#18)
I like being hated because I'm white, it goes well with being hated because I hate the nanny state.
And I'm optimistic. See, I think you can be realistic and optimistic at the same time. I'm optimistic we'll achieve -- I know we won't achieve if we send mixed signals. I know we're not going to achieve our objective if we send mixed signals - gwbush
#20. To: Jhoffa_, robin, Esso, Zipporah, christine, orangedog, tom007, crack monkey, dude lebowski, h-a-l-f-w-i-t-t, Flintlock (#18)
Best Clown Rape Movie Ever: *****
And I'm optimistic. See, I think you can be realistic and optimistic at the same time. I'm optimistic we'll achieve -- I know we won't achieve if we send mixed signals. I know we're not going to achieve our objective if we send mixed signals - gwbush
#21. To: Jhoffa_ (#17)
Well, what is evolution other than simply a successful mutation that natural selection has permitted to propogate? :)
"Devolution" or mutation seems more the term.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest