[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)


Health
See other Health Articles

Title: Study Questions Post-MI Beta-blocker Use: Increased HF Risk, No Mortality Benefit
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 8, 2014
Author: Michael O'Riordan
Post Date: 2014-07-08 05:21:18 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 16

Analysis Questions Use of Beta-Blockers Before CABGDrugs Given per AMI Guidelines but Not at Adequate DosesBeta Blockers of No Use in Stable CAD NEW YORK, NY — A new meta-analysis with more than 100 000 study participants suggests that clinical guidelines recommending the use of beta-blockers in post-MI patients need to be "reconsidered"[1].

The conclusions of the researchers, led by Dr Sripal Bangalore (New York University School of Medicine, NY), are based on their findings showing that while beta-blockers reduce reinfarction and angina in the post-MI setting, there is no reduction in the risk of mortality. More important, the meta-analysis showed that the use of beta-blockers increased the risk of heart failure and cardiogenic shock.

Published online June 10, 2014 in the American Journal of Medicine, the meta-analysis included 60 clinical trials with 102 003 patients. The patients were stratified into two distinct eras: the reperfusion era, which included 12 trials of 48 806 patients treated in the modern era of thrombolysis and interventional procedures, and the prereperfusion era, which included 48 studies with 31 479 patients.

Currently, the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines for treating STEMI state the use of oral beta-blockers within the first 24 hours is a class I indication. Intravenous beta-blockers are recommended (class IIa) for hypertensive patients or those having ischemia. However, as Bangalore and colleagues point out, the majority of data supporting the use of beta-blockers predate modern reperfusion therapy and current medical management strategies with statins and antiplatelet agents.

In their analysis, the researchers observed a significant interaction between clinical outcomes and reperfusion era. For example, in the prereperfusion era, which mainly included trials with intravenous beta-blockers, there was a significant 14% relative reduction in all-cause mortality, as well as a 13% relative reduction in cardiovascular mortality, a 22% reduction in MI, and a 12% reduction in angina. In this era, there was no increased risk of heart failure or cardiogenic shock.

The mortality benefit was not evident in the reperfusion era, although there was a 28% reduction in MI and a 20% reduction in angina. However, these reductions were traded off against a 10% increased risk of heart failure and a 29% increased risk of cardiogenic shock.

The researchers acknowledge the analysis of the prereperfusion era might have lacked sufficient power to detect a mortality difference, but they suggest that in this era, "lack of reperfusion and contemporary medical therapy likely resulted in extensive myocardial scarring, providing a substrate for reentrant circuits and fatal ventricular arrhythmias." Reperfusion reduces the likelihood of scars forming, they note, and this might be the reason for the differences between the two eras.

In the reperfusion era, with the increased risk of heart failure and cardiogenic shock, the risk/benefit ratio of using beta-blockers "no longer seems to be favorable," write Bangalore et al.

Juan Valdiviezo| Medical Student 5pts16 prof 16Featured 1 hour agoIt's very interesting article! Most of the MI guidelines recommend Beta-blockers but maybe in the future we will understand the differences of response and the previous conditions.


Poster Comment:

: heart attack Function: noun : an acute episode of heart disease marked by the death or damage of heart muscle due to insufficient blood supply to the heart muscle usually as a result of a coronary thrombosis or a coronary occlusion and that is characterized especially by chest pain—called also myocardial infarction; compare angina pectoris, coronary insufficiency, heart failure 1

cardiogenic shock Function: noun : shock resulting from failure of the heart to pump an adequate amount of blood as a result of heart disease and especially heart attack

1throm·bo·lyt·ic Pronunciation: Ìthräm-bY-Èlit-ik Function: adjective : destroying or breaking up a thrombus throm·bus Pronunciation: Èthräm-bYs Function: noun Inflected Form(s): plural throm·bi -Ìb+, -Ìb : a clot of blood formed within a blood vessel and remaining attached to its place of origin—compare embolus

isch·emia Variant(s): or chiefly British isch·ae·mia is-Èk-m-Y Function: noun : deficient supply of blood to a body part (as the heart or brain) that is due to obstruction of the inflow of arterial blood (as by the narrowing of arteries by spasm or disease)

: an·gi·na Pronunciation: an-Èj+-nY, Èan-jY- Function: noun : a disease marked by spasmodic attacks of intense suffocative pain: as a: a severe inflammatory or ulcerated condition of the mouth or throat —see ludwig's angina, vincent's angina b: angina pectoris Reperfusion therapy is medical treatment that restores blood flow through blocked arteries, typically after a heart attack (myocardial infarction). Categories of reperfusion therapy thus include clot-busting (thrombolytic) drugs and procedures to open arteries with stents, or to graft arteries around blockages.[1] These interventions have become so central to the modern treatment of acute myocardial infarction, that we are said to be in the reperfusion era.[2][3] Patients who present with suspected acute myocardial infarction and ST segment elevation (STEMI) or new bundle branch block on the 12 lead ECG are presumed to have an occlusive thrombosis in an epicardial coronary artery. They are therefore candidates for immediate reperfusion, either with thrombolytic therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or when these therapies are unsuccessful, bypass surgery. Individuals without a ST segment elevation are presumed to be experiencing either unstable angina (UA) or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). They receive many of the same initial therapies and are often stabilized with antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulated. If their condition remains (hemodynamically) stable, they can be offered either late coronary angiography with subsequent restoration of blood flow (revascularization), or non-invasive stress testing to determine if there is significant ischemia that would benefit from revascularization. If hemodynamic instability develops in individuals with NSTEMIs, they may undergo urgent coronary angiography and subsequent revascularization. The use of thrombolytic agents is contraindicated in this patient subset, however.[4] The basis for this distinction in treatment regimens is that ST segment elevations on an ECG are typically due to complete occlusion of a coronary artery. On the other hand, in NSTEMIs there is typically a sudden narrowing of a coronary artery with preserved (but diminished) flow to the distal myocardium. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents are given to prevent the narrowed artery from occluding. At least 10% of patients with STEMI don't develop myocardial necrosis (as evidenced by a rise in cardiac markers) and subsequent Q waves on EKG after reperfusion therapy. Such a successful restoration of flow to the infarct-related artery during an acute myocardial infarction is known as "aborting" the myocardial infarction. If treated within the hour, about 25% of STEMIs can be aborted.[5]

Thrombolytic therapy[edit] Main article: Thrombolysis Thrombolytic therapy is indicated for the treatment of STEMI if the drug can be administered within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms, the patient is eligible based on exclusion criteria, and primary PCI is not immediately available.[6] The effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy is highest in the first 2 hours. After 12 hours, the risk associated with thrombolytic therapy outweighs any benefit.[4][7] Because irreversible injury occurs within 2–4 hours of the infarction, there is a limited window of time available for reperfusion to work. Thrombolytic drugs are contraindicated for the treatment of unstable angina and NSTEMI[4][8] and for the treatment of individuals with evidence of cardiogenic shock.[9] Although no perfect thrombolytic agent exists, an ideal thrombolytic drug would lead to rapid reperfusion, have a high sustained patency rate, be specific for recent thrombi, be easily and rapidly administered, create a low risk for intra-cerebral and systemic bleeding, have no antigenicity, adverse hemodynamic effects, or clinically significant drug interactions, and be cost effective.[10] Currently available thrombolytic agents include streptokinase, urokinase, and alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, rtPA). More recently, thrombolytic agents similar in structure to rtPA such as reteplase and tenecteplase have been used. These newer agents boast efficacy at least as well as rtPA with significantly easier administration. The thrombolytic agent used in a particular individual is based on institution preference and the age of the patient. Depending on the thrombolytic agent being used, adjuvant anticoagulation with heparin or low molecular weight heparin may be of benefit.[11][12] With TPa and related agents (reteplase and tenecteplase), heparin is needed to maintain coronary artery patency (openness.) Because of the anticoagulant effect of fibrinogen depletion with streptokinase[13] and urokinase[14][15][16] treatment, it is less necessary there.[11] Intracranial bleeding (ICB) and subsequent cerebrovascular accident (CVA) is a serious side effect of thrombolytic use. The risk of ICB is dependent on a number of factors, including a previous episode of intracranial bleed, age of the individual, and the thrombolytic regimen that is being used. In general, the risk of ICB due to thrombolytic use for the treatment of an acute myocardial infarction is between 0.5 and 1 percent.[11] Thrombolytic therapy to abort a myocardial infarction is not always effective. The degree of effectiveness of a thrombolytic agent is dependent on the time since the myocardial infarction began, with the best results occurring if the thrombolytic agent is used within two hours of the onset of symptoms.[17][18] If the individual presents more than 12 hours after symptoms commenced, the risk of intracranial bleed are considered higher than the benefits of the thrombolytic agent.[19] Failure rates of thrombolytics can be as high as 20% or higher.[20] In cases of failure of the thrombolytic agent to open the infarct-related coronary artery, the patient is then either treated conservatively with anticoagulants and allowed to "complete the infarction" or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, see below) is then performed. Percutaneous coronary intervention in this setting is known as "rescue PCI" or "salvage PCI". Complications, particularly bleeding, are significantly higher with rescue PCI than with primary PCI due to the action of the thrombolytic agent.

Percutaneous coronary intervention[edit] Main article: Percutaneous coronary intervention If these irregular, fast heart rhythms continue for a length of time, the body will not get enough oxygen-carrying blood. Without oxygen, the brain and body tissues cannot function normally and die.

Causes and Risk Factors What causes ventricular arrhythmia? Studies have shown that ventricular tachycardias (VT) often occur in patients who have had damage from a heart attack, cardiac surgery, or other conditions. Some people with inherited heart defects also experience VT. Sometimes VT affects individuals with no history of a heart condition. In cases of ventricular fibrillation (VF), patients usually lose consciousness very quickly. If a fast ventricular rhythm is not treated it can change into VF, can lead to sudden cardiac arrest and ultimately sudden cardiac death. Sudden cardiac arrest affects 350,000 people each year in the United States (meaning that every 38 seconds, someone dies from sudden cardiac arrest).1

Symptoms What are symptoms of ventricular arrhythmia? If you are in a fast ventricular arrhythmia, you may feel as though your heart is skipping beats or fluttering. If the rhythm is very fast, you may experience fainting spells, blackouts, temporary blind spots, or dizziness. Eventually, you may become unconscious and your heart might stop (cardiac arrest).

Diagnosis How is ventricular arrhythmia diagnosed? The diagnosis of ventricular arrhythmias, which are often unpredictable, can be challenging. To diagnose ventricular tachycardia (VT), your doctor may initially use an electrocardiogram (ECG) test. Some arrhythmias, however, are intermittent and may not always show up during an ECG test. Your doctor may suggest other monitoring tests that can identify when you are having an arrhythmia and what type of rhythm it is. There are two types of VTs that may be seen on ECG: Monomorphic VT looks the same from one beat to the next on the ECG Polymorphic VT has more than one shape on the ECG Ventricular tachycardias are often defined when three or more fast heart beat come from the same place in the ventricle. A VT is also described by how long it lasts: Nonsustained VT is a fast VT that stops within 30 seconds Sustained VT is a fast VT that stops after 30 seconds or with treatment In cases of ventricular fibrillation (VF), patients usually lose consciousness very quickly. Doctors typically consider a diagnosis of VF when a person suddenly collapses and experiences sudden cardiac arrest. An ECG at the time of collapse can confirm that the rhythm problem is VF. Further tests are usually necessary to determine the cause and possible treatments for VT or VF. An electrophysiology (EP) study test is a test used to evaluate heart rhythms from inside your heart.

Treatment How is ventricular arrhythmia treated? Both ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are life-threatening heart rhythms. In emergencies, paramedics or medical personnel can treat these arrhythmias with external defibrillators, such as an AED. Long-term treatment options vary according to the type of arrhythmia and individual patient circumstances. Tachyarrhythmias can sometimes be stopped or treated with medicines or surgery. These treatments are used in an effort to control or destroy the portion of heart tissue that causes the abnormal rhythms. In other cases, an implanted electronic device may be used to treat the arrhythmia. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) delivers electrical energy to the heart to slow it down to a more normal rhythm. This allows the S-A node to take control again. An ICD can use one or more types of energy to help your heart beat normally again. They include: Anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) – If your rhythm is regular but fast, the ICD system can deliver a series of small, rapid electrical pacing pulses. These are used to interrupt the arrhythmia and return your heart to its normal rhythm. Cardioversion – If your arrhythmia is regular but very fast, the ICD can deliver a low-energy shock. This can stop the arrhythmia and return your heart to its normal rhythm. Defibrillation – For arrhythmias that are very fast and irregular, like VF, high-energy shocks can be used to stop the arrhythmia. Then your heart can return to its normal rhythm.

ICD Therapy - Watch the Video [00:19] Many people have arrhythmias that are dangerous and that can occur at any time. You might already have had an episode of VT or VF. This can happen even if you are taking medication to treat your abnormal heart rhythm. After studying test results, your doctor may decide that you might experience abnormal heart rhythms again, and perhaps, cardiac arrest. Your doctor may recommend an ICD for one or more of the following reasons: At least one experience of VT or VF Previous cardiac arrest or abnormal heart rhythm that caused you to pass out A fast heart rhythm that keeps returning and could cause death A fast heart rhythm that cannot be controlled with drugs Severe side effects from drug therapy A fast heart rhythm that cannot be cured by surgery Previous heart attack and a low ejection fraction

FPRIVATE "TYPE=PICT;ALT=Image of Patient Matt Noble" Matt Noble may be young—he’s in his 30s—but he has dealt with more heart problems than many people ever will. Born with a serious heart condition, he'd had three open-heart surgeries by age 5. When he received his first implantable cardioverter defibrillator at age 17, he'd already survived five sudden cardiac arrests. Matt knows about ICD therapy from his job and from his personal experience. “With my type of arrhythmia, I need to get full-energy shocks. So after the instant of pain from the shock, my chest is sore for a few seconds. But it's nothing compared to the pain I've had after CPR, before I had my defibrillator.” “I've probably had about 20 shocks in my life so far, but I still remember my first shock. For the first time, I realized that I actually felt safe after an arrhythmia instead of scared that I might die.” http://www.bostonscientific.com/lifebeat-online/heart-smart/ventricular-arrhythmias.html

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  



[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]