[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

COL. Douglas Macgregor : What happen at the secret meeting between Israel and Russia? The CDC Planned COVID Quarantine Concentration Camps Nationwide NASA staff beg Elon Musk to 'clean house' after agency spent millions of Americans' money on DEI agenda Sanctuaries Freed 22,000 Criminal Aliens Sought by ICE Under Biden "Human Please die": Chatbot responds with threatening message Antifa Groups Recruiting, Organizing And Mobilizing For Violence During Donald Trump's Second Term In Office Joe Biden's "WTH" Moment of the Day with President of Peru..... Germany: Police Raid Pensioner's House, Drag Him To Court After He Retweets Meme Calling Green Minister "Idiot" Israel's Most Advanced Tank Shredded To Pieces In Gaza Chinese Killer Robo Dog Israeli Officials Belatedly Claim Secret Nuclear Site Destroyed In Last Month's Iran Strikes Lake County California Has Counted Just 30 Percent of Votes – Ten Days After Polls Closed! Real Monetary Reform More Young Men Are Now Religious Than Women In The US 0,000+ online influencers, journalists, drive-by media, TV stars and writers work for State Department "Why Are We Hiding It From The Public?" - Five Takeaways From Congressional UFO Hearing Food Additives Exposed: What Lies Beneath America's Food Supply Scott Ritter: Hezbollah OBLITERATES IDF, Netanyahu in deep legal trouble Vivek Ramaswamy says he and Elon Musk are set up for 'mass deportations' of millions of 'unelected bureaucrats' Evidence Points to Voter Fraud in 2024 Wisconsin Senate Race Rickards: Your Trump Investment Guide Pentagon 'Shocked' By Houthi Arsenal, Sophistication Is 'Getting Scary' Cancer Starves When You Eat These Surprising Foods | Dr. William Li Megyn Kelly Gets Fiery About Trump's Choice of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General Over 100 leftist groups organize coalition to rebuild morale and resist MAGA after Trump win Mainstream Media Cries Foul Over Musk Meeting With Iran Ambassador...On Peace Vaccine Stocks Slide Further After Trump Taps RFK Jr. To Lead HHS; CNN Outraged Do Trump’s picks Rubio, Huckabee signal his approval of West Bank annexation? Pac-Man Barron Trump

Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Pat Buchanan: Country That Can't Control Borders Not a Country
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Pa ... 3_07082014&promo_code=qxbco32y
Published: Jul 8, 2014
Author: Drew MacKenzie
Post Date: 2014-07-08 17:08:34 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 236
Comments: 14

Pat Buchanan: Country That Can't Control Borders Not a Country

Tuesday, 08 Jul 2014 09:47 AM

By Drew MacKenzie

Conservative commentator Pat Buchanan has slammed President Barack Obama's "inaction" on the immigration crisis while warning that a country that cannot control its borders is no longer a country.

While promoting his book "The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose from Defeat to Create the New Majority" on Fox News' "Hannity," the former presidential candidate said the "character and composition" of the United States will forever be changed if the influx continues unabated.

"As Ronald Reagan said, 'A country that won't or can't control its borders is not a country anymore,'" Buchanan said. "What's happening on our southern border and Europe is [that] the failed states of the Third World are driving people basically to try to seek to have what exists in the West and the United States.

"But the truth is, if you do not get control of folks pouring into your country from all over the world, they will alter the character and composition of your country and change it forever without the consent of the American people."

Story continues after video.

Buchanan said to stop the "thousands of children pouring into the country," the United States should erect a secure fence — a double or triple-link fence — all along the border with Mexico.

"We got to tell folks we know how much you want to come but we decide who comes into our national home," he said.

Buchanan blamed former President George H.W. Bush for helping to create the current crisis by not securing the border back in the early 1990s when he said 5,000 illegal immigrants were crossing the border every weekend.

"If the government had acted then we would be dealing not with 12 million or 20 million, but 3 million. Many of them would have been gone. But it's a failure of both political parties, presidents of both parties. Why in heaven's name don't they know how to control the borders of their own country?"

Buchanan continued, "I think any president … taking a look at what's happening now would at least finally act. But this president doesn't act. He talks. What he says is an excuse for his inaction. I've never seen a president like that."

Read Latest Breaking News from http://Newsmax.com www.newsmax.com/Newsfront...8/id/581351#ixzz36ugbtXp0

Poster Comment:

Pat is spot on with this. No border means no country. That is why I was and still am opposed to NAFTA. ;)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

But it's a failure of both political parties, presidents of both parties. Why in heaven's name don't they know how to control the borders of their own country?"

Wake the hell up Buchanan.

Buchanan is just like the rest of the media, as if there are two parties.

There is but one "party", the ruling elite government party.

Cynicom  posted on  2014-07-08   17:14:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

There is but one "party", the ruling elite government party.

The PTB alternate between the two parties so that the people think there is change, when in reality, there is no change. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2014-07-08   17:32:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Build a fence, 30' tall and 30' deep of sheer polished concrete and be done with it.

It's really very simple.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-07-08   18:18:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Just like the other million articles by White men. Whine, never suggest Americans meet in real life, whine, repeat over and over...

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." Samuel Adams, (1722-1803)

Americans 1st  posted on  2014-07-08   20:02:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

PJB doesn't get out? PJB is still doing interviews, talks with his editors, and so forth. He can write well, and his sentences are lucid. I wouldn't describe him as whining or repetitive. He gets right to the point.

Deasy  posted on  2014-07-08   20:34:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

No borders means no country.

Try going to or from Canada w/o a passport. They seem to do well with securing our northern border.

Obnoxicated  posted on  2014-07-08   20:42:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

PJB doesn't get out? PJB is still doing interviews, talks with his editors, and so forth. He can write well, and his sentences are lucid. I wouldn't describe him as whining or repetitive. He gets right to the point.

So what?

Nothing has changed. He never suggests that Whites organize and affect change.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." Samuel Adams, (1722-1803)

Americans 1st  posted on  2014-07-09   11:40:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Break for grammar:

An 'affected' change is probably phony, and merely has the appearance of change. We wouldn't want that, would we? An effected change is brought about by people who are effective.

Effectiveness in the face of great challenge requires understanding the problems involved. This is best achieved via education. In this case, PJB is a high-value educator. He communicates concepts effectively, requirement number one for organizing change. His grammar is very good too.

If every Republican read and agreed with PJB's last few books, effecting change would be much easier. But reading is a dying art.

Deasy  posted on  2014-07-09   19:06:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

But reading is a dying art.

Comprehending's even more dead.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2014-07-09   19:13:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Break for grammar:

An 'affected' change is probably phony, and merely has the appearance of change. We wouldn't want that, would we? An effected change is brought about by people who are effective.

Effectiveness in the face of great challenge requires understanding the problems involved. This is best achieved via education. In this case, PJB is a high-value educator. He communicates concepts effectively, requirement number one for organizing change. His grammar is very good too.

If every Republican read and agreed with PJB's last few books, effecting change would be much easier. But reading is a dying art.

It should be “affect change”, as the verb affect means to influence, where as effect refers to an outcome. I really don't give a shit which is most correct. Why don't you troll the thousand treads on the internets that endlessly argue of whether it should be effect or affect change instead of me.

One thing is for certain, angst ridden White men on the internets have never been able to affect or effect change in real life.

Why can't you address the original issue of White people never doing anything in real life as a group? That's the fundamental problem.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." Samuel Adams, (1722-1803)

Americans 1st  posted on  2014-07-10   12:19:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Deasy  posted on  2014-07-10   18:58:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I really don't give a shit which is most correct.

You really don't, that's clear. You're uninterested in using our mother tongue correctly. Why should I care what you have to say in it, then? The English language is a marvel of clarity and precision, a tool for communicating the most bold of ideas. The American colonists established Committees of Correspondence and exchanged letters among them challenging each other to think more clearly and act more boldly with respect to political change.

Many words were exchanged among people who would never meet face to face. English and a bit of Latin and Greek were used to express such ideas and concepts as to move men's souls. Their grammar was impeccable. It demonstrated skill and intelligence to the reader, a key to further consideration, a calling card with credentials clearly attached.

I suggest putting the English language first before you goad anyone else to put America first.

Deasy  posted on  2014-07-10   20:03:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

You really don't, that's clear. You're uninterested in using our mother tongue correctly. Why should I care what you have to say in it, then? The English language is a marvel of clarity and precision, a tool for communicating the most bold of ideas. The American colonists established Committees of Correspondence and exchanged letters among them challenging each other to think more clearly and act more boldly with respect to political change.

Many words were exchanged among people who would never meet face to face. English and a bit of Latin and Greek were used to express such ideas and concepts as to move men's souls. Their grammar was impeccable. It demonstrated skill and intelligence to the reader, a key to further consideration, a calling card with credentials clearly attached.

I suggest putting the English language first before you goad anyone else to put America first.

I'm not interested in your steaming pile of bullshit ad hominem attacks. I thought I made that crystal clear in the last reply. And there really is nothing that will "move your soul" to engage in anything but trolling on the internet.

And the reason why you're still avoiding my original question. Coward.

"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." Samuel Adams, (1722-1803)

Americans 1st  posted on  2014-07-10   20:47:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And the reason why you're still avoiding my original question.

You might want to seek help with your reading skills.

Deasy  posted on  2014-07-10   20:59:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]