See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: The Real Michael Brown?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://charlestonthuglife.net/2014/08/14/what-a-sham/
Published: Aug 15, 2014
Author: Chief
Post Date: 2014-08-15 12:20:21 by Lod
Keywords: None
Views: 1032
Comments: 42
Huh!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 34.
#5. To: Lod (#0)
Reader: Surveillance Pics of Brown Assualting Store Clerk 10 mins before shooting Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail] Date: Friday, 15-Aug-2014 11:37:48 In Response To: Ferguson Police Chief Reveals Name Of Officer Who Fatally Shot Michael Brown - Darren Wilson (Susoni) ********************************************************* Sus, he also had prior arrests in St Ann Missouri for theft and assault with bodily harm. This was a liquor store i think. Some sort of convenience store. Then they moved on to Quick Trip. ----------------- A police report indicates that Brown was a “primary suspect” in the robbery that took place the day he was fatally shot. According to the report, Brown got physical with the convenience story employee over a box of cigars worth $48.99 he was trying to steal.
I cannot even make out who that person would be on those images because the face is cut off from the top and in the fourth image the face is obscured by some light that blocks out the face.
Maybe the t-shirt, khaki shorts and strange sandals will help.
Help with what? That there is a black man down on the streets? That does not explain who that guy was in the video image.
It does not convict him of anything so to speak at this point. However, without hammering the point to death for those who are visually impaired, the similarity of dress and somewhat unusual combination of apparel strongly suggest that this is the same individual given the assumption that the security cam still can be dated and timed just previous to the event in question. Does that help?
No it does not help and nor does it provide ample proof of his "unusual manner of dress" as you call it. Remember that images taken from a video camera from a crime scene can be cropped and tampered with. It is why the video provides proof because images taken from that video can be tampered with to suppress and/or withhold information from the pubic.
"Proof" will be in found the preponderance of the evidence, and the chain of evidence will be examined and challenged in front of a jury. Only time will tell where that leads. The stills presented here are part of a police report, as far as we can tell at this point, and will have to be sworn to on pain of perjury. Let's not jump to any hasty conclusions at this point. This story is still evolving. ; ]
I definitely agree here.
There are no replies to Comment # 34. End Trace Mode for Comment # 34.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#21. To: randge (#5)
#25. To: purplerose (#21)
#26. To: randge (#25)
#28. To: purplerose (#26)
(Edited)
Help with what? That there is a black man down on the streets? That does not explain who that guy was in the video image.
#29. To: randge (#28)
(Edited)
Does that help?
#33. To: purplerose (#29)
#34. To: randge (#33)
Let's not jump to any hasty conclusions at this point. This story is still evolving. ; ]
Replies to Comment # 34.