[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

‘I Smell CIA/Deep State All Over ThisÂ’ — RFK Jr. VP Nicole Shanahan Blasts Sanctuary Cities, we see peaceful protests launching in Los Angeles” - Democrat Senator Cory Booke We have no legal framework for designating domestic terror organizations Los Angeles Braces For Another Day Of Chaos As Newsom Pits Marxist Color Revolution Against Trump Admin Methylene Blue Benefits Another Mossad War Crime 80 served arrest warrants at 'cartel afterparty' in South Carolina When Ideas Become Too Dangerous To Platform The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class Kiev Postponed Exchange With Russia, Leaves Bodies Of 6,000 Slain Ukrainian Troops In Trucks Iranian Intelligence Stole Trove Of Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Files In the USA, the identity of Musk's abuser, who gave him a black eye, was revealed Return of 6,000 Soldiers' Bodies Will Cost Ukraine Extra $2.1Bln Palantir's Secret War: Inside the Plot to Cripple WikiLeaks Digital Prison in the Making? In France we're horrified by spending money on Ukraine Russia has patented technology for launching drones from the space station Kill ICE: Foreign Flags And Fires Sweep LA 6,000-year-old skeletons with never-before-seen DNA rewrites human history First Close Look at China’s Ultra-Long Range Sixth Generation J-36Jet I'm Caitlin Clark, and I refuse to return to the WNBA Border Czar Tom Homan: “We Are Going to Bring National Guard in Tonight” to Los Angeles These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike I heard libs might block some streets. 🤣

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: My Questions on 9/11 WTC explosions/collapses (VANITY)
Source: Mehitable
URL Source: http://Mehitable
Published: Dec 23, 2005
Author: Mehitable
Post Date: 2005-12-23 10:57:26 by mehitable
Keywords: explosions/collapses, Questions, (VANITY)
Views: 849
Comments: 36

I was wondering if any of you good folks can point me to articles or information about the WTC collapse. Like most people I just took it at face value that the planes flew into the buildings, exploded, and the towers collapsed. I'm usually not gullible, but heck, I saw it with my own eyes and I'm not an engineer or physicist or explosions expert.

Now I'm starting to wonder about just how a plane could fly into a skyscraper like that and make the whole thing collapse. Not just once, but twice. How is that possible? I would expect that there'd be one hell of a hole but we have tornados that hit skyscrapers and don't knock the whole thing down. I'm not some kind of crank who believes in conspiracies around every corner, but sometimes they actually do happen.

I'm wondering what folks think are the best sites for info? I'm aware of Awoken but are there any others? Also, does anyone have any info on other incidents of planes flying into buildings/structures and what happened as a result? Have any computer simulations of 9/11 been done with the appropriate simulation for planes, fuel, building construction, etc., to see exactly what the most likely result of such a collision would be - scientifically speaking?

Either those buildings were badly designed, which is possible, I guess - but they did withstand earlier bombings, didn't they - or there's something fishy here. I think enough time has elapsed from the grief of 9/11 to start looking at this objectively.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#20. To: mehitable (#0)

I always tell people of Jimmy Walter's offer of one million dolars to anyone who can prove the towers were not brought down by explosives. Go Here: http://Reopen911.org

Then there is the paper written by Professor Steven Jones of the BYU physics department that proves WTC 7 collapsed from explosives pre-positioned prior to 9-11. Go Here: http://www.physics.b yu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

There is a website dedicated to WTC building 7 which never was hit by a plane but collapsed in 6.6 seconds which was just .6 seconds longer than the 6 seconds it would have taken for a 47 story building to collapse in free fall. Go Here: http://www.wtc7.net

Horse  posted on  2005-12-23   12:41:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I've started looking over some of these sites, again - thank you all. It appears pretty obvious that the govt investigation into 9/11 was the 21th century version of the Warren Commission.

What the govt never seems to take into consideration is that our own bias and emotions (for most people) is automatically in favor of our govt. Who wants to believe that their govt is totally corrupt, run by evil men and women, and that we have no control over it, nor any true democracy? That's a bitter pill. However, when the govt goes through such extraordinary lengths to cover up information, prevent investigation, stop witnesses from testifying, hides evidence - one has to look at the govt as the prime suspect. What other conclusion could be drawn?

If the govt were not so eager to cover things up and lie to us, they could have simply presented the perfectly plausible idea that more Islamic terrorists had hidden explosives within the WTC and, timed with the plane hits, detonated them. This would have given them an entirely plausible reason for the explosions and the behavior of the buildings without having to cover anything up. But such a simple (if untrue) explanation doesn't seem to occur to these folks....

mehitable  posted on  2005-12-23   12:59:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#24. To: mehitable (#22)

If the govt were not so eager to cover things up and lie to us, they could have simply presented the perfectly plausible idea that more Islamic terrorists had hidden explosives within the WTC and, timed with the plane hits, detonated them. This would have given them an entirely plausible reason for the explosions and the behavior of the buildings without having to cover anything up

then they would've had to explain how the arab terrorists got such strong access to the building. The lights in the building were off either the night before or 2-3 nights before the event. This dimming of the lights like this had never happened since the building was first opened in early 1970's. there was evidently a massive operation to plant bombs. They didn't want to point people's attention to that.

Remember, reality is created by repeating those truths on tv. A simple story sells. It doesn't matter if there are holes in the story. get people thinking too much and you can't fool them. doesn't matter if a small percentage of the population sees through their explanations. Dissent is to be squelched.

Red Jones  posted on  2005-12-23 13:40:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What the govt never seems to take into consideration is that our own bias and emotions (for most people) is automatically in favor of our govt.

You have to be very young and uninformed to say something like this. Most people do not trust the government, of that I can assure you. Poll after poll confirms this fact. No one in their right mind would buy a government story that Islamists just planted the bombs in the WTC when we weren't looking. Very few mostly naive people would buy such a story. The government knows that people don't trust them, that's why they employ the major media outlets to effectively deliver their propaganda to the masses. More people trust the talking heads on TV and radio than any politician. When they get together and push a story it's hard to counter it no matter what facts you have on your side. But even the talking heads wouldn't convince enough people to believe that we just happened to have such a lack security at the WTC, even though we knew it was a terrorist target and had already been bombed in '93, that allowed terrorists to slip in and plant the massive amounts of explosives that would have been necessary to bring down the towers in the way they were observed to fall on 9/11. Nope, very few would buy that story no matter who peddled it. It's much easier to convince the masses that the planes impact with the WTC towers and the resulting fires led to the collapse of both structures. The reason they can get away with this lie is because very few Americans have a scientific education and even fewer have an understanding of basic physics. The USA has been successfully dumbed down. BTW if you are not "hittable", then why the screen name "mehitable"? Not that I would want to hit on a total stranger that I have never seen, just curious.

RickyJ  posted on  2005-12-24 13:27:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]