[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Taxpayer Funded Censorship: How Government Is Using Your Tax Dollars To Silence Your Voice

"Terminator" Robot Dog Now Equipped With Amphibious Capabilities

Trump Plans To Use Impoundment To Cut Spending - What Is It?

Mass job losses as major factory owner moves business overseas

Israel kills IDF soldiers in Lebanon to prevent their kidnap

46% of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination or within two days

In 2002 the US signed the Hague Invasion Act into law

MUSK is going after WOKE DISNEY!!!

Bondi: Zuckerberg Colluded with Fauci So "They're Not Immune Anymore" from 1st Amendment Lawsuits

Ukrainian eyewitnesses claim factory was annihilated to dust by Putin's superweapon

FBI Director Wray and DHS Secretary Mayorkas have just refused to testify before the Senate...

Government adds 50K jobs monthly for two years. Half were Biden's attempt to mask a market collapse with debt.

You’ve Never Seen THIS Side Of Donald Trump

President Donald Trump Nominates Former Florida Rep. Dr. Dave Weldon as CDC Director

Joe Rogan Tells Josh Brolin His Recent Bell’s Palsy Diagnosis Could Be Linked to mRNA Vaccine

President-elect Donald Trump Nominates Brooke Rollins as Secretary of Agriculture

Trump Taps COVID-Contrarian, Staunch Public Health Critic Makary For FDA

F-35's Cooling Crisis: Design Flaws Fuel $2 Trillion Dilemma For Pentagon

Joe Rogan on Tucker Carlson and Ukraine Aid

Joe Rogan on 62 year-old soldier with one arm, one eye

Jordan Peterson On China's Social Credit Controls

Senator Kennedy Exposes Bad Jusge

Jewish Land Grab

Trump Taps Dr. Marty Makary, Fierce Opponent of COVID Vaccine Mandates, as New FDA Commissioner

Recovering J6 Prisoner James Grant, Tells-All About Bidens J6 Torture Chamber, Needs Immediate Help After Release

AOC: Keeping Men Out Of Womens Bathrooms Is Endangering Women

What Donald Trump Has Said About JFK's Assassination

Horse steals content from Sara Fischer and Sophia Cai and pretends he is the author

Horse steals content from Jonas E. Alexis and claims it as his own.

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room


Business/Finance
See other Business/Finance Articles

Title: Whats the Fed Up To With the Money Supply?
Source: Safe Haven
URL Source: http://www.safehaven.com/showarticle.cfm?id=4331&pv=1
Published: Dec 23, 2005
Author: by Robert McHugh
Post Date: 2005-12-23 13:05:23 by Horse
Keywords: Supply?, Whats, Money
Views: 193
Comments: 108

Over the past two days, December 21st - when our first Hindenburg Omen (of whatever cluster is coming) - and Thursday December 22nd, the Federal Reserve has conducted one of the largest two-day Repo injections of money into the system since back in September 2001. On Wednesday they added $18.0 billion in reserves and on Thursday they added another $20.0 billion. Is this a coincidence, coming right as we get another Hindenburg Omen? Probably not. Is something high-risk going on behind the scenes here? Let's review some facts at the Fed. On November 10th, 2005, shortly after appointing Bernanke to replace Greenbackspan, the Fed mysteriously announced with little comment and no palatable justification that they will hide M-3 effective March 2006. M-3 has been the main staple of money supply measurement and transparent disclosure since the Fed was founded back in 1913. It is the key monetary aggregate that includes Fed Repo transactions, that mechanism whereby the Fed increases reserves. The date when M-3 will start being hidden also happens to be the exact month that Iran will declare economic war against the U.S. Dollar by trading its oil in Petro-Euros on its new bourse. But there is more. The Federal Reserve currently has three vacancies within the 19 top Regional Bank and Board of Governor spots. Why? Part of ongoing wholesale resignations.

The latest is from the Philly Fed. Fed President and Open Market Committee member Anthony Santomero has announced his resignation after only a brief year and a half tenure. Very unusual. Hey, Fed Presidents are treated like gods. They have enormous power, prestige, and presence. Why quit? He is far from alone. Over the past few years no less than six Federal Reserve Regional Bank Presidents have resigned. This is highly unusual.

An immediate impact is that we are about to have a largely inexperienced batch of individuals conducting monetary policy in the United States. So of course, the first thing they will do is hide the key money figures. Two positions for the Board of Governors (there are 7)have been open for quite a while. Plus six of the 12 Regional Head spots have turned over during the past few years.

If a substantial amount of oil transactions will suddenly be conducted in Euros instead of Dollars, this should put pressure on the Dollar as folks exchange Dollars for Euros, jeopardizing the Dollar's status as the world's reserve currency, making it more difficult to print all the dollars the Fed wants to without driving the Dollar into the ground. Iraq threatened to do what Iran has threatened to do just before we went in looking for weapons of mass disappearance. If the Dollar tanks, Treasuries might not be far behind. If Treasuries tank, kiss the Housing-driven boom goodbye. Could the Master Planners be hiding M-3 because they anticipate they may have to monetize the Federal debt, buy our own Treasury Bonds during the coming economic attack against the Dollar? That would require a ton of new fresh money creation - too much to disclose. Could it be some folks at the top of the Fed do not have the stomach to be part of what is about to go down?

M-3 has a direct but lagging impact on financial markets. Look at the chart at the top of the prior page. Whenever M-3 rises, the Dow Industrials rise. Whenever M-3 is flat or declines, the Dow Industrials decline. The Dow Industrials are a bellwether for the economy. If we can monitor M-3, we can better monitor the future path of equities and the economy. It is wrong for the Fed to stop its disclosure for this very reason. Investors need to know in a free market economy, because M-3 infusion is centrally planned intervention into a free market system. Investors need to know when the Master Planners have decided to intervene. Our buy/sell signals were designed to pick up the scent of Master Planner intervention by analyzing supply and demand forces underlying the markets. So with or without a fully disclosed M-3, we will be able to continue to identify coming multi-week trends.

So what about M-3 the past week? The latest figures show that on a seasonally adjusted basis, M-3 rose 27.3 billion last week, a 14.0 percent annualized clip, and is up $76 billion over the past month, a 9.8 percent growth rate. But those are the massaged numbers. For the raw figures, fasten your seat belt. Are you ready? M-3 was increased $58.7 billion last week (that does not include the huge Repo infusions noted above), a 30.0 percent annualized rate of growth. For the past two week, the Fed added $93.5 billion to the money supply, a 24.0 percent annual clip. Over the past 6 weeks it is up $192.9 billion, a 16.7 percent Banana Republic hyperinflationary pace. This is nuts, folks - unless there is an incredible risk out there we are not being told about. That is a lot of money for the Plunge Protection Team's arsenal to buy markets - stocks, bonds, currencies, whatever. This level of irresponsible money supply growth makes shorting markets hazardous, yet at the same time says markets are at huge risk of declining. Maybe M-3 growth doesn't stop the decline this time. Should be a fascinating storm in 2006.

The recent rise in Gold catalogued 74 points over about a month, a 16 percent rally from precisely the day the Fed announced it would hide M-3 from taxpayers and citizens of this great nation. That is no coincidence. Gold sees hyperinflation, monetization of debt, and intervention into free markets. Gold is telling us it expects Ben Bernanke to be an inflationist.


Poster Comment:

My apologies, but as usual with this computer I could not copy the chart. This article does tell us that the M3 money supply is growing at a fast clip. And as of April Fools Day 2006 the FED will no longer tell us how much money they are printing. I still believe that REPORTED INFLATION will be low during 2006,at least, until after the elections in November. But the real purpose is for Wall Street to unload their junk bonds, steal what has not yet been stolen and invest overseas so they can repatriate their funds after the dollar collapses buying America for pennies on the dollar.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 91.

#2. To: Horse (#0)

Iraq threatened to do what Iran has threatened to do just before we went in looking for weapons of mass disappearance.

Iraq did more than threaten. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/RRiraqWar.html

"The Federal Reserve's greatest nightmare is that OPEC will switch its international transactions from a dollar standard to a euro standard. Iraq actually made this switch in Nov. 2000 (when the euro was worth around 82 cents), and has actually made off like a bandit considering the dollar's steady depreciation against the euro. (Note: the dollar declined 17% against the euro in 2002.)

"The real reason the Bush administration wants a puppet government in Iraq -- or more importantly, the reason why the corporate-military-industrial network conglomerate wants a puppet government in Iraq -- is so that it will revert back to a dollar standard and stay that way." (While also hoping to veto any wider OPEC momentum towards the euro, especially from Iran -- the 2nd largest OPEC producer who is actively discussing a switch to euros for its oil exports)."

Sam Houston  posted on  2005-12-23   13:19:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Sam Houston (#2)

Iran has been feeling pretty frisky lately now that they have us sinking in the swamp of Iraq.

Richard W.

Arete  posted on  2005-12-23   13:29:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Arete (#3)

It could very well be that Iran will go to selling oil for euros knowing full well it will trigger world war.

I note that on the radio they report that the US dollar will close the year higher against most major currencies than it started the year. With the massive trade deficit we have (the largest as a percentage of gdp sustained this long in world history) the dollar should drop. and yet it rises.

because it is an artificial currency, propped up artificially, given artificial strength.

so that the people of the world can pay a tribute. think about it. We can buy without exporting to cover our purchases. Nobody else can. It is a system of tribute.

Red Jones  posted on  2005-12-23   13:45:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Red Jones (#4)

It is a system of tribute

Of course it is. Our government acts exactly as you would exact any mafia street thug to act. Pay me protection and do what you are told, and nothing blows up. If you don't, well then maybe a train or something goes boom.

Richard W.

Arete  posted on  2005-12-23   13:53:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Arete (#5)

Pay me protection and do what you are told, and nothing blows up

that's the sad part - the more effectively we resist them, then the worse the 'terrorism' will get.

that's one reason I don't really advocate thinking that we can win. I do advocate informing people and educating them.

Red Jones  posted on  2005-12-23   14:01:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Red Jones (#6)

That's one reason I don't really advocate thinking that we can win. I do advocate informing people and educating them.

Old proverb goes something like this: "When your enemy is busy destroying themselves, get out of the way and let them continue doing what they're doing". We don't have to win, we just have to survive, because this system is doing a fine job of tearing itself to pieces. Our efforts are best spent in thinking about what we want to build in the vacuum created by the sudden implosion of this system. Because if we don't have a plan, I can assure you that they do, and they're ready to implement it.

Therefore I suggest that we spend less time talking about how bad things are, and instead talk about what we want to build once this nightmare passes.

One other thought: Blind worship of the Constitution is not the solution, the Constitution is a great but deeply flawed document, and we need to ponder these flaws and come up with something new that embodies the spirt of the Constitution while also having a chance of working and persisting in the real world.

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2005-12-23   16:09:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Elliott Jackalope (#9)

Blind worship of the Constitution is not the solution, the Constitution is a great but deeply flawed document, and we need to ponder these flaws and come up with something new that embodies the spirt of the Constitution while also having a chance of working and persisting in the real world.

No problem. Here is how to solve all problems very quickly:

Change the interstate commerce clause by adding this: ... but these powers are limited to regulating only the movement of goods and services across state borders.

That ought to fix 80% of the woes we face in terms of regulation. The rest of it is fine the way it is with one exception - limit voting to taxpayers only and also cut out anyone recieving public assistance.

mirage  posted on  2005-12-23   18:01:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: mirage (#11)

And this would end corporate dominace of our political system? This would end unlimited lobbying money? This would do something about our insane policies of unlimited free trade, unlimited immivasion and unlimited government power? By fixing the commerce clause? How?

Sorry, we need to do a whole lot more thinking than that. One thing we need to think about is the whole idea of politicians. Is it really a good idea to have people who go into and then out of public service? Is it really a good idea to have politicians be multi-millionaires? Or would something more like a priesthood model be more appropriate, a system where one takes a vow of poverty and service, and is then guaranteed a modest living for the rest of their days, whether or not they are re-elected? And that's just one thing that needs to be re-thought, I've got lots of other issues with the Constitution, believe me.

For example: It purports to be a great document for defining the government of a nation, but does absolutely nothing to acknowlege or even define what a nation is. Is a nation a polyglot assembly of every different tribe, race, color, creed and belief system shoved together into a work camp run by gangsters? Or is a nation more like an extended family, a larger reflection of the families that make it up? Because if that is the case, then we need to consider the issues of race, religion and culture. Oh, that's right, in the current system we can't even bring those issues up, can we?

Elliott Jackalope  posted on  2005-12-23   20:10:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Elliott Jackalope, mirage (#13)

One thing we need to think about is the whole idea of politicians.

I agree with Elliott on this point. and I chastise you mirage for putting faith in man and the things of man.

We can't even follow the constitution as is. The constitution is just a piece of paper and nobody respects it other than in a token ceremonial way. That is fact, and if you want me to explain that to you I will.

So, what good would it do to change it? In theory you have a good idea mirage. But you under-estimate the failure of man. You put your faith in man, a fatal mistake.

The American nation has exposed the flaws of mankind for all to see. If evil has attacked our nation and we cannot prevail over it, then think how hopeless it is that other (lesser) nations can likewise prevail.

Trying to be positive though, our ancestors used to tar and feather leaders that were known to be their enemies. That would help.

Red Jones  posted on  2005-12-23   20:18:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Red Jones (#14)

I agree with Elliott on this point. and I chastise you mirage for putting faith in man and the things of man.

There is no hope? We should just stop trying to improve things?

Never. You are to be chastened for giving up and accepting things as is. There is always room for improvement. Perhaps we should try some.

mirage  posted on  2005-12-23   22:01:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: mirage (#22)

Perhaps we should try some.

you are a fool to put your faith in man or the things of man.

Nothing really good ever came from a man. What men produce we build sewers and treatment plants for.

if we turn our hearts to god, then our nation can be healed. and there is no other way. it is foolish to pretend that by tweaking a law or through some educational innovation or super-therapy for the people that things will improve.

The United States of America was a strong effort by man to rule himself. This effort has failed, you are a fool not to see this. We must be ruled by god if we are to prosper, or even if we are to live.

you are enamored with man mirage.

Red Jones  posted on  2005-12-23   23:17:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: Red Jones (#28)

We must be ruled by god if we are to prosper, or even if we are to live.

I presume you meant to capitalize "God", but that's neither here nor there.

Do you mean the perfectly just "God" who killed 70,000 innocent people to punish David because he was tempted by the devil to take a census?

Or who made a gentleman's wager with the same devil to test the fortitude of his faithful servant Job, and inflicted inordinate misery in the process?

The "God" of perfect compassion who closed the wombs of all of the women of the house of Abimelech because Abraham deluded him regarding his wife, Sarah?

The "God" who believed other gods (particularly of Egypt) lived, necromancy is possible or slavery is a legitimate institution?

The "God" who calls human art corruption on account of his own insecurities. (Deut 4:16)

The "God" who savors burnt offerings, blood-smeared altars and enjoys the death of every living thing in towns that are at odds with "his people"?

The "God" that prescribes bathing a pigeon in anothers blood, or slaying assorted animals for various transgressions?

The "God" who was ready to destroy even his own people when they worshiped a false idol until Moses reminded him that he in fact has a covenant to uphold?

The "God" who endowed man with free will, then got pissed and killed most of them in a worldwide flood for exercising said will?

The "God" who would eternally burn the vast majority of all souls ever created because of the faults of short and sometimes tortured lives?

This tyrant, worse than the villians of other religions has an interest in redeeming anything? And would offer his son for that purpose? This monster should judge me?

I ain't buying.

Dude Lebowski  posted on  2005-12-24   21:59:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Dude Lebowski (#42)

Do you mean the perfectly just "God" who killed 70,000 innocent people to punish David because he was tempted by the devil to take a census?

Or who made a gentleman's wager with the same devil to test the fortitude of his faithful servant Job, and inflicted inordinate misery in the process?

The "God" of perfect compassion who closed the wombs of all of the women of the house of Abimelech because Abraham deluded him regarding his wife, Sarah?

god has brought down many people and done many things to them that were unpleasant. This is true. he uses every nation for his purposes not for ours'. our understanding of his purposes is not very good, we are limited in that capacity. But he has no problem understanding us completely and far better than we understand ourselves.

history unfolds for the sake of teaching the people who god is and proper attitude we should have towards him. and to test us as individuals so that god can judge us when the appointed time comes. Many people die in this process and it perplexes us greatly.

I wish I knew in the bible where it counsels us about death. God laughs at our deaths in this world. For he can restore us and he tells us not to fear this death. We fear this death and he laughs at us for it. But after death there is a judgement. and this judgement in the negative is like a second death. and god says this second death is what we should fear.

Red Jones  posted on  2005-12-24   22:16:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#65. To: Red Jones (#44)

god has brought down many people and done many things to them that were unpleasant.

Not to be a contrarian, but this couldn't possible be God. Rather is is a literal account of Eastern desert scribes depiction of a God. Every tribe had one or many and in every case they were nationalistic deities and favored only their own, they were great and powerful, fair and just etc. etc. Yahweh is no more realistic than Osiris, Horus or Isis. But you wouldn't think about worshipping them.

But he has no problem understanding us completely and far better than we understand ourselves.

He only understood what his authors wanted him to understand; the worst characteristics of humanity - envy, avarice, narcissism, irritibility, cruelty. His sensibilities mirror those of the men of the era. He loved gold and precious gems, in fact his kingdom and tabernacle are littered with them. But on the molecular level they are simply condensed energy. Like wood and granite.

He understands everything, correct? Except the scientific principles of the world he created. On behalf of Isaiah and Hezekiah he stopped the Earth, which spins at a thousand miles per hour, reversed it's rotation without upsetting anything else, mind you, and set the sundial back 15 degrees (1 hour, I believe). Of course you have no trouble believing that. It's a miracle and God could (and in fact did) it, right? Yet if I told you, and sincerely believed myself there was once a lesser deity named Promethuis who has his heart and liver eaten daily by an eagle only to have it constantly grow back... well that's the variety of miracle you probably laugh off. So it's all subjective, but as I haven't witnessed any such burning bushes, talking donkeys or cheubim myself, I choose to remain skeptical.

But after death there is a judgement.

This is a subjective claim. I have no doubts that everything that exists in nature is needed. Is there a cosmic need for post-mortem reprisals against the exceedingly naughty. I doubt it. Another possible misconception born of the mind of man. Generally when I argue religion I get the believer to reveal something when he says "Well what if there is a hell". He reveals uncertainty, since no one really knows (even near-death experiences might brain functions). So he acknowledges that it's good to hedge your bets and believe. Well philospohically and spiritually I need more than that and empty promises of bliss in the next life. The slaves and the downtrodden needed a belief in something better the next time around. Now the creed only appeals to vanity. You want your self, your personal property (experiences, personality) to last forever. We know some of this is kept in certain centers of the brain which stays here and rots after death. So when the sea gives up her dead and every once living person is resurrected (Lot's sister mentioned this), do the molecules that comprised them also return? Even after they've long since been recycled into new things and people? Heck, if you believe in miracles, why not? Everything could be a potential miracle if God says so? Pigs could fly if God wanted them to.

As for me, it's too unlikely a story.

there are many spirits and there are fallen angels as well. there are others besides the one true god with power.

Do you see these guys often? Their existence made perfect sense to ignorant people thousands of years ago. Before diseases had causes or names, strokes of bad fortune, severe weather phenomena. It was demons and spirits and spiteful heffalumps. They are no more real than ghosts.

as far as slavery goes, slavery was once a common institution. and when it was common in old testament days and in the days of jesus god did not think so badly of it.

Interesting. So the age old question of morality. Morality clearly says you can't enslave another. It doesn't matter what was common then. To Yahweh it was immoral to disrespect him. But that isn't nearly as immoral as murder, as we know morality. So where does law come from? From a flawed idea of God. Or did he invent sin which is inordinately more evil than commiting it. Don't go on the original sin tangent because carniverous dinosaurs and pre-human creatures, which are fact, disprove that concept.

So God could have set things straight and said, don't enslave your fellow man or don't wage wars of vengance or don't kill in my name as additional commandments. But he didn't. Jesus, in seeing the future could have said, don't torture others on my account but he didn't.

In his name an inordinate amount of bodies have been tortured and mental growth stunted. He even said he came not to bring peace, but the sword. To seperate fathers from daughters, etc. Or something to that effect.

Sadly, he was correct about that.

Dude Lebowski  posted on  2005-12-25   0:28:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#81. To: Dude Lebowski (#65)

In his name an inordinate amount of bodies have been tortured and mental growth stunted

I guess some 'christians' in spain & italy about 500-600 years ago were doing some torture. but I would saythese were false believers. we should be repulsed by the torture and degredation of human beings.

Red Jones  posted on  2005-12-25   1:48:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#84. To: Red Jones (#81)

You don't think rapture monkeys are stunted? It's prolly those ciggys we made them smoke while roller skating.

Dakmar  posted on  2005-12-25   1:49:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#90. To: Dakmar (#84)

You don't think rapture monkeys are stunted?

I don't go along with the rapture ideology. Neither do a lot of others. It is controversial. There is language in the bible that describes something exactly like what the rapture proponents describe, a sudden taking of the believers from the earth. But that language is prefaced by the phrase 'as if'. And I think god is just describing the time when the separation of the people will occur. This occurs after great trials, tribulation and trouble; and that is very plainly and explicitly and at great length described in the bible. But rapture ideology people deny this, the suspicion is that they are afraid to look at the trouble coming and fantasize they won't face it. I go along with the conventional christian view (not the rapture view). the rapture view is relatively new, only less than 150 years old. But the bible says very clearly we will not be able to understand the prophecies of the end times until the end times get here. the bible says there will be many false teachers and teachings in those end times. and much deception. Matthew chapter 24 is a good quick summary of the end times from the point of view of a common believer as is told by jesus. But this is only the quick short version spoken by jesus. these prophecies are spoken of at great length in multiple other books, new testament & old testament, especially Daniel and Revelation.

Red Jones  posted on  2005-12-25   2:04:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#91. To: Red Jones (#90)

Many false teachers, I agree. Follow the freaking money. Messiah pointed to the door, but no one had the guts to leave the temple...

Dakmar  posted on  2005-12-25   2:08:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 91.

#93. To: Dakmar (#91)

Follow the freaking money

Exactly correct. here is bible verse.

1 Timothy 6:10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. it does not say that sexual lust or unfaithfulness is the root of all evil. It does not say failure to follow either god's law or man's law is hte root of all evil. It says the LOVE OF MONEY is the root of all evil.

Red Jones  posted on  2005-12-25 02:12:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 91.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]