[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Business/Finance See other Business/Finance Articles Title: Republicans Can Learn A Lot From Burger King's Move To Canada The merger of U.S. hamburger giant Burger King with Tim Horton’s, Canada’s favorite coffee shop, will create the world’s third largest “fast food” company with a total of 18,000 restaurants in over 100 countries. It is also a piercing wake-up call for the U.S. because the new company will make its global headquarters in Canada’s province of Ontario. That underscores what savvy business everywhere have learned, namely, that the United States is an increasingly less attractive place to do business. “Canada has quietly and politely become, well, more AMERICAN than America,” says columnist Stephen Green. Since 2003, more than thirty-five major American companies have moved their headquarters and reincorporated overseas. Rather than rail against such “inversions” as President Obama does or call for an economic boycott as Ohio's Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown does, we should figure out what is driving American companies beyond our borders. Here's a clue: the United States now has the highest corporate tax rate of any industrialized country, and the Wall Street Journal reports the Obama administration is “even now looking for ways it can unilaterally raise corporate taxes without going to Congress.” Canada has long been both our more socialist and consequently, our poorer neighbor to the north. But that has changed over the last two decades. Starting in 1995, Canada has drawn back from a public debt precipice, restrained government spending and dramatically overhauled its tax system. Next year, it will also begin unilaterally reducing tariffs on thousands of manufactured goods—recognizing that free trade makes for wealthier consumes and a more prosperous society. The results are dramatic. This year, Canada has a higher per-capita household income than the United States, an unheard of development that no one saw coming. It ranks eighth in the annual Economic Freedom of the World index that the Fraser Institute compiles for over 150 countries, with especially strong marks in property rights and business freedom. By comparison, America ranks a pathetic seventeenth in the Fraser index and is now categorized as only “mostly free.” “Unfortunately for the United States, we’ve seen overspending, weakening rule of law, and regulatory overkill on the part of the U.S. government, causing its economic freedom score to plummet in recent years. This is a stark contrast from 2000, when the U.S. was considered one of the most economically free nations and ranked second globally,” concluded Fraser’s Fred McMahon. While the American eagle has plummeted in terms of economic freedom, the Canadian maple leaf has prospered. The consulting firm of KPM looked at the tax costs of doing business in ten major nations. Assigning us a benchmark score of 100, it found that Canada’s costs were the lowest, 46.4 percentage points lower than ours. The United Kingdom, Mexico, and the Netherlands also beat us out. Canada’s strategy of lowering tax burdens on business was a conscious one, begun under the Liberal government of Paul Martin and accelerated since 2006 by Stephen Harper’s Conservatives. The late Jim Flaherty, who served as Harper’s finance minister until March of this year, told me last year that the essence of smart taxation is “to raise the resources needed for prudent government while creating an environment where the private sector is encouraged to create the longer-lasting jobs a country needs to prosper.” He concluded that “if you can give people enough upward opportunity for average people the talk will be on creating more of it rather than redistributing a shrinking pie.” Among the innovations that Flaherty introduced was the Tax Free Savings Account, which allows Canadians to save more by setting aside money tax-free if it's invested. Between that and the already established Registered Retirement Savings Plan, which is focused on building retirement income, Canadians now have more tax-free savings vehicles to help them remain independent during their lifespan than any people outside of Chile, which privatized its Social Security system in the 1980s. No one suggests that Canada is a pure beacon of freedom. Harper’s Conservatives have a majority of seats in Parliament but just shy of 50 percent of Canada’s in the last election of 2011 cast ballots for either the Liberals or New Democrats, both interventionist purveyors of big government. Canada’s single-payer health system delivers less innovation and longer waiting lists than Americans would be likely to tolerate, and many of Canada’s provinces are once again piling up debt and overspending. But Canada proves that a country can climb out of a deep fiscal hole within a remarkably short number of years and build a prosperous society even while it retains a large welfare state. That is a lesson for Democrats, who rather than rail against Burger King’s lack of economic patriotism, should learn how Canada has avoided America’s economic stagnation. And also a lesson for Republicans, who often lack the courage of their convictions in calling for genuine economic reform. Canada’s economic example—and the political success of Harper and the Conservatives in winning three elections in a row—should stiffen their spines. Poster Comment: "...the United States now has the highest corporate tax rate of any industrialized country, and the Wall Street Journal reports the Obama administration is “even now looking for ways it can unilaterally raise corporate taxes without going to Congress...The late Jim Flaherty, who served as Harper’s finance minister until March of this year, told me last year that the essence of smart taxation is “to raise the resources needed for prudent government while creating an environment where the private sector is encouraged to create the longer-lasting jobs a country needs to prosper.” He concluded that “if you can give people enough upward opportunity for average people the talk will be on creating more of it rather than redistributing a shrinking pie.” Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: scrapper2 (#0)
It's worked wonders here, lol. Although Canada is part of NAFTA...maybe it's just too cold to appeal to lazy grifters. corruptissima re publica plurimae leges - Tacitus
he, he, he I think you're right. Although I read a story recently about ONE ( yes, it made front page headlines in Canada!) "enterprising" Mexican [illegal] lady who is currently trying to work the Cdn. immigration system with a sad tale of woe of what will happen if she and her "Cdn born" child ( how many millions of times have we heard that woeful tale stateside?) are returned to Mexico. Dumteedumdum... I felt like screaming to Canadians at large: "camel's nose under the tent" or "if you give a mouse a cookie" or "just say noooooo!" But I didn't. Maybe I suffer from a case of misery loves company...
I know Canada doesn't have to put up with 14th amendment nonsense, but I wonder if they have similar problem with "you drop it we pay for it" immigration laws. From your post it sounds like they don't, at least not as universally held principle.
corruptissima re publica plurimae leges - Tacitus
I think it's because in 1991 Canada ratified an UN convention re: the rights of a child that this wedge is being brought up by illegals who are slated to be deported. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Con...n_the_Rights_of_the_Child BTW, Canada doesn't mess around with deportations - check out the stats here: globalnews.ca/news/153656...r-children-activists-say/ Here's the story about the Mexican female illegal I referenced earlier - anyway, it seems that she got a stay on being deported - 2 years to get her child custody affairs in order - well, at least the judge gave her a specific time frame unlike our crows in black who say tell illegals that they're being released on their own recognizance and to report back to court in 5 or 10 years.
LOL, so do desk clerks if the parents barricade 5 star hotel room doors without paying. Again, not something the rest of us need to be on the hook for. corruptissima re publica plurimae leges - Tacitus
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||