[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Huge shortage plagues Israeli army as losses mount in Lebanon, Gaza

Researchers Find Unknown Chemical In Drinking Water Posing "Potential Human Health Concern"

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

Putin visibly ‘shocked’ by US green-light for long-range missiles to strike inside Russia

The Problem of the Bitcoin Billionaires

Biden: “We’re leaving America in a better place today than when we came into office four years ago … "

Candace Owens: Gaetz out, Bondi in. There's more to this than you think.

OMG!!! Could Jill Biden Be Any MORE Embarrassing??? - Anyone NOTICE This???

Sudden death COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review

Russian children returned from Syria

Donald Trump Indirectly Exposes the Jewish Neocons Behind Joe Biden's Nuclear War

Key European NATO Bases in Reach of Russia's Oreshnik Hypersonic Missile

Supervolcano Alert in Europe: Phlegraean Fields Activity Sparks Scientists Attention (Mass Starvation)


9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: 9-11 Attacks/C2C program summary
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2014/09/11
Published: Sep 22, 2014
Author: staff
Post Date: 2014-09-22 05:06:07 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 195
Comments: 1

On the 13th anniversary of the 9-11 attacks, former professor of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University, Dr. Judy Wood, appeared in the first half of the show, presenting evidence that the destruction of the WTC buildings was the result of directed energy technology. The Towers didn't collapse or burn up, they turned to dust in mid-air-- this is known because seismic charts don't indicate that the buildings slammed into the ground, she detailed. "There's no detectable S or P waves for any of the five events," which would be present in the case of a controlled demolition, she continued.

In contrast to some involved in the '9-11 Truth' movement, Wood contends that bombs or explosions are ruled out as the cause of the buildings' destruction, and that the so-called evidence for thermite is just residue from the structures' aluminum cladding. Further, the hijacked jets could not have turned the structures into dust, she said. Directed energy technology is not like a point-and-shoot laser beam but more akin to a field effect, where a certain zone is affected, she explained, adding that she suspects that the people who jumped from the Towers did so to escape this effect.

Website(s):

wheredidthetowersgo.com drjudywood.com theharbinger...com

Book(s):

Where Did the Towers Go? The Harbinger The Mystery of the Shemitah

9-11 Attacks Show Audio Listen with Windows Player High Low Listen with Coast Player (Pop-up blockers may need to be disabled) Download MP3s Hour 1 Hour 2 Hour 3 Hour 4 IMPORTANT: Some mobile devices do not download MP3s. If this is the case, please use your desktop computer.


Poster Comment:

upcoming shows Mon 09-22 New World Order & ETs • Paul Hellyer Tue 09-23 Space Warp/ Light Beings • David Pares | Stewart Pearce Wed 09-24 Ebola Preparedness/ Warren Commission • Matthew Stein | Russ Baker Thu 09-25 Earthfiles Reports • Linda Moulton Howe Fri 09-26 Near Death Experiences • Tara MacIsaac

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tatarewicz, *9-11* (#0) (Edited)

On the 13th anniversary of the 9-11 attacks, former professor of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University, Dr. Judy Wood, appeared in the first half of the [C2C] show, presenting evidence that the destruction of the WTC buildings was the result of directed energy technology. The Towers didn't collapse or burn up, they turned to dust in mid-air-- this is known because seismic charts don't indicate that the buildings slammed into the ground, she detailed. "There's no detectable S or P waves for any of the five events," which would be present in the case of a controlled demolition, she continued.

In contrast to some involved in the '9-11 Truth' movement, Wood contends that bombs or explosions are ruled out as the cause of the buildings' destruction, and that the so-called evidence for thermite is just residue from the structures' aluminum cladding. Further, the hijacked jets could not have turned the structures into dust, she said. Directed energy technology is not like a point-and-shoot laser beam but more akin to a field effect, where a certain zone is affected, she explained, adding that she suspects that the people who jumped from the Towers did so to escape this effect.

YouTube recording for that C2C interview of Dr. Judy Wood from last year:

Dr. Judy Wood Interview on Coast To Coast AM (September 11, 2014) COMMERCIAL-FREE - YouTube

Published on Sep 13, 2014 by Field Interference [1 hour 7.5 minutes]

Dr. Judy Wood appeared on Coast2Coast with George Noory to discuss the evidence of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on 9/11 and her book, Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11.

For a forensic study of what happened to seven World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, read the book "Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood, a structural engineer with a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science and expertise in experimental stress analysis, engineering mechanics and strength of materials testing.

http://drjudywood.com

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

[More info in the YouTube Description section]


2 recent audio interviews [Headphone alert: both start very loudly; lower volume ASAP]:

1. Page link for an onscreen podcast of Dr. Judy Wood interview by Deanna Spingola - Sat 12th Sep 2015, 4pm - 7pm Eastern, 9pm - 12am BST [3 hours]

2. Page link for an onscreen podcast of Dr. Judy Wood interview at John Barbour's World, September 9, 2015 | BBS Radio | Broadcast Time & Date: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 03:00 pm [2 hours]

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-10-01   15:27:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]