See other Editorial Articles
Title: Why the Race Baiting Now?
Source:
4
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 6, 2014
Author: Deasy
Post Date: 2014-12-06 21:10:44 by Deasy
Keywords: ferguson, judaism, jews, catholic
Views: 758
Comments: 23
First let me say that this is not about civil rights for whites. We've lost our civil rights long ago, through our "good," wholly-unamerican behavior. Comment if you disagree and we can discuss that issue. I have a notion that our media is behind the upheaval we're seeing over police use of deadly force against blacks. The media was quick to report lying eyewitness accounts of the Ferguson shooting. The NYC choking death was being supervised by a black female cop, from what I hear. The question is why now? The media is owned by just a few corporations. FOX appears to be the outlier and we must not conclude that its dissent is genuine. What's more, Jewish organizations all over the country are abetting the media lies and encouraging blacks to play the victim card while failing to denounce the riots or outright justifying them. Non-Anglo owned media sources like Al Jazeera and RT have mostly been critical of American police strategy from the militarization of our police to the profiling of blacks. British and French sources are gleefully raising Cain over the failure of the American political system. So what is happening? It reminds me of the riots of the 1960s after MLK and RLK were shot. Those too had media fingerprints on them, and Jews were eager to exploit and incite outrage. It seems America is in for big changes again, along the lines of the 1968 Firearms Act, Great Society welfare, and so forth. Certainly Obama is not coming out of this looking like a success. Could we be seeing a coordinated effort to swing voters toward the NeoCons of the Republican party? It is hard to see the difference between the two but the GOP is more pro-Israel than the DNC is by a smidgen. What say the people of 4um? In related analysis, I'm predicting that Zionist factions within the US are going to let anti-amnesty candidates make it part way through the GOP primaries to siphon and control conservatives. Example: Dennis Michael Lynch, dmldaily.com Shrinking the ratio of whites to others in America must not be slowed for a minute, so these candidates will not succeed in the long run, or they will renege on their thin promises. DML for example states that it's impossible to secure the borders, and that he has to be elected before deportations can begin, saying that to require such before "immigration reform" is a distraction. Please note that America has become a Catholic country over the past 30 years. The Church favors amnesty and support for migration of Hispanics from the south for good reason. Who benefits the most from illegal immigration in America? The Church is one obvious answer. Also, in times of distress (like now during the racial unrest) people will go to their churches of choice for comfort and there the pastors will tell them how to "handle" each crisis. The Church automatically gets a greater say in our politics at times like these. So: what is next?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#7. To: Deasy (#0)
Anyone saying that any border cannot be secured is both a fool and a liar. What an insane pant-load.
Thanks for this, Lod. With drones and other high tech gear with sufficient helicopters and other aircraft on standby it shouldn't be that difficult. One thing he's right about: getting congress to secure the borders before implementing immigration reform that is constitutional and guards our demographic balance will be just about impossible.
#12. To: Deasy, 4 (#11)
This border protection was begun in the seventh century BC. Never, ever tell me that we cannot protect our borders; just don't, it's insane.
No immigration reform is needed, nor would it be Constitutional for Congress to
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#11. To: Lod (#7)
What an insane pant-load.
Replies to Comment # 11. 
#17. To: Deasy (#11)
One thing he's right about: getting congress to secure the borders before
implementing immigration reform that is constitutional
enact any non-uniform Rule of Naturalization to specially pander to illegals, nor
can they be legalized by any Executive branch action or lack thereof such as
"prosecutorial discretion" and whatnot. What's being promoted for America
without saying so is No Realistic Rules of Immigration and Naturalization --
a George Soros-styled "Open Society" of Open Borders.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.