[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Professor Of War Warns Many European Countries Are In A 'Pre-Civil-War' State

The man suspected of shooting 2 Minnesota lawmakers is in custody after surrendering to the police

Ana Kasparian Trashes Democrats

Lesson from Bees

"Caviar, Champagne And Lobster": MAGA's Exclusive $500K Private Club Launches - With Bessent, Bondi & RFK Jr. Partying With Tech Billionaires

Cruz unleashes on 'theocratic lunatic' ayatollah over nuclear weapon ambitions

BREAKING NEWS: All Hell Breaks Loose When Marjorie Taylor Greene Accuses Dem Governors Of 'Murder'

TheyÂ’re refusing to release the Minnesota shooterÂ’s manifestoÂ…

TSA agent dodges Local 10 News after being accused of assaulting senior

"Major Escalation!" Just happened In Iran-Israel War as Trump faces CRISIS MOMENT |

'GET RID OF THEM': Exiled crown prince reveals why Iranian regime is weaker than ever

"This Changes Everything" - Scott Ritter Says Israel's Strike on Iran Could Spark Global War

New Germans celebrate Carnival in Berlin.

Northern Ireland in Flames: Riots Erupt Over Immigration, Housing & Crime

China Has Started Supplying Weapons To Iran

IRAN Wiped Out U.S. THAAD System, Two F-35 Fighters, and 'David's Sling' System

Iran is Getting Destroyed and Russia Can't Do Anything

MSM is straight up lying to you about Vance Boelter.

I Flipped 100 Rocks in a Rainforest, Here's What I Found...

Paul Joseph Watson She F*cked Up Real Bad

How Effective is THAAD in Defending Israel Against Iranian Missile Strikes?

L.A. has deployed their tactical women’s assault team (Satire)

Sky News vs. Iranian Professor: The Most Intense Interview of 2025!

Media Critics Call on CNN to Fire Brian Stelter Over Reckless Tweet Following Minnesota Shooting

Minnesota Gunman Vance Boelters Wife Detained for Questioning

Sanctuary State Governors Double Down On Illegal Immigration In Tense Capitol Hearing

Iranian Missiles OBLITERATE Israeli Nuclear Facility — Massive Explosions Rock Tel Aviv!

The Most Environmentalist Woman in the World (Satire)

Trump Rejects Netanyahu's Request To Join War, As Israel Needs Large US Bunker Buster Bombs

Inside the Chaos: Paid Rioters, Fake News & The 2025 Shift Ft. Brandon Tatum


All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: disinformation
Source: 4um
URL Source: http://freedom4um.com
Published: Jan 11, 2015
Author: Deasy
Post Date: 2015-01-11 22:16:42 by Deasy
Keywords: rt, xinhua, aljazzera
Views: 448
Comments: 6

I'll make this short. RT and Global Research are piping lots of news at us. So is Xinhua and Al Jazeera. These are well-funded news agencies with lots of staff. One thing I've noticed is that they're consistent only about one thing: breaking down consensus among Americans about any important issue for national survival. The reporting is truthful, objective, and fills in a huge gap left by our controlled media. But on any given issue, they'll take a side, any side, sometimes both sides, and pump out consensus-busting information to all takers.

Think about it. I'm thinking of the Yuri Bezmenov lecture presented by G. Edward Griffin back during the Cold War. He called a dishonest version of the techniques I'm accusing these agencies of using "demoralization."

A proper consensus would lead to massive reforms in our system from top to bottom. Lack of consensus translates to inflexibility and readily-influenced masses. Collapse or disintegration are possible outcomes of inflexibility.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Deasy (#0)

it's either info, or disinfo. either way, disecting information is a very interesting and fun proposition. im sort of addicted to it.

so, we can either wade thru all this, or whatever aspect interests each of us personally, or be like the dolts that sit in front of the tube and watch sports or nonsense all day. and then you have the folks who don't have time for any of it, and are just struggling to survive!

I just saw this study which says most americans don't have 500 bucks

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2015/01/most- americans-dont-have-savings-to-pay.html

life is short, can be very short. so I suppose people will do how they feel best suits their time . to each their own.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2015-01-11   22:50:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Deasy (#0) (Edited)

RT and Global Research are piping lots of news at us. So is Xinhua and Al Jazeera. These are well-funded news agencies with lots of staff. One thing I've noticed is that they're consistent only about one thing: breaking down consensus among Americans about any important issue for national survival. The reporting is truthful, objective, and fills in a huge gap left by our controlled media. But on any given issue, they'll take a side, any side, sometimes both sides, and pump out consensus-busting information to all takers.

Think about it. I'm thinking of the Yuri Bezmenov lecture presented by G. Edward Griffin back during the Cold War. He called a dishonest version of the techniques I'm accusing these agencies of using "demoralization."

A proper consensus would lead to massive reforms in our system from top to bottom. Lack of consensus translates to inflexibility and readily-influenced masses. Collapse or disintegration are possible outcomes of inflexibility.

Depends on what you'd like the consensus to be on what, doesn't it? Tell me the difference between you and them, Deasy. On the Paris issue, what you've advocated is that there shouldn't be a consensus yet about this alleged terror attack, which is one of the most blatantly obvious false flag stagings ever seen. And why not? If there shouldn't be a prompt agreement to resist that as clearly more than absurd and, instead, we ought to send a consensus message to the scripters that there's evidently nothing they call news for their Police State and War agendas that can be seen as a false flag action and called so in rapid enough formation to deter their processions, if not that, then I'm nearly convinced at this point that it's a complete waste of time to question anything else of their Psychological Warfare antics.

Reconstruction edits.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-01-12   3:27:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Artisan (#1)

it's either info, or disinfo.

I think it can be both. What's important here is that these sources aren't on our side. They each have an agenda, just like every other source.

Deasy  posted on  2015-01-12   13:13:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: GreyLmist (#2)

On the Paris issue, what you've advocated is that there shouldn't be a consensus yet

For me that's rational at this point. I've already explained that my "reaction" isn't different in either situation: false-flag or otherwise.

Deasy  posted on  2015-01-12   13:34:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Deasy (#4) (Edited)

On the Paris issue, what you've advocated is that there shouldn't be a consensus yet about this alleged terror attack, which is one of the most blatantly obvious false flag stagings ever seen. And why not?

For me that's rational at this point.

Why do you think it's rational to not agree that alleged "news footage" linked above is a staged PsyOp?

Edited quote section.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-01-12   14:13:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: GreyLmist (#5)

I haven't watched it.

Deasy  posted on  2015-01-12   14:18:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]