Rense begins by saying "it would appear to be some sort of a Muslim act (to which Tarpley says, I would hold off on that). Then Rense continues "Remember I said that it appears to be. We cannot rule anything in or out at this point. However, with the False Flag atmosphere on this planet, anything is possible. I don't know who did it. I do know that who they identified could be another Lee Harvey Oswald kind of thing. You never know."
Did I hear correctly that Rivero believes that the officer who was shot wasn't in fact shot? If that's his theory, that would make the officer a crisis actor and anyone who subsequently was involved in examining this actor part of a conspiracy. I don't get the risk to reward aspect in staging a highly visible crime scene.
His words. He said the video shot outside the offices of Charlie Hebdo, ironically enough shot by a member of the Israeli media, was being reported around the world as showing these terrorists killing an officer on the ground yet the video clearly shows that the shot misses him and he just lies there still.
+1 Christine. A shot in the head point blank with an AK-47 should have made a hell of a mess. All I saw on the video was a cloud of dust two feet to the left of the victim. To quote Lainie Benes, "It smells. It smells bad. It smells REALLY bad."