[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
War, War, War See other War, War, War Articles Title: PETER HITCHENS: Don't like the PC mob? Well now that makes YOU a terror threat Theresa Mays Home Office is making a law which attacks free expression in this country as it has never been attacked before We are on the verge of founding Britains first Thought Police. Using the excuse of terrorism whose main victim is considered thought Theresa Mays Home Office is making a law which attacks free expression in this country as it has never been attacked before. We already have some dangerous laws on the books. The Civil Contingencies Act can be used to turn Britain into a dictatorship overnight, if politicians can find an excuse to activate it. But the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill, now slipping quietly and quickly through Parliament, is in a way even worse. It tells us what opinions we should have, or should not have. As ever, terrorism is the pretext. Yet there is no evidence to suggest that the criminal drifters, school drop-outs and drug-addled losers who do much terrorist dirty work (and whose connections with vast worldwide conspiracies are sketchy to say the least) will be even slightly affected by it. In a consultation paper attached to the Bill, all kinds of institutions, from nursery schools (yes really, see paragraph 107) to universities, are warned that they must be on the lookout for extremists. But universities are told they have a responsibility to exclude those promoting extremist views that support or are conducive to terrorism. Those words conducive to are so vague that they could include almost anybody with views outside the mainstream. What follows might have come from the laws of the Chinese Peoples Republic or Mr Putins Russia. Two weeks advance notice of meetings must be given so that speakers can be checked up on, and the meeting cancelled if necessary. Warning must also be given of the topic, sight of any presentations, footage to be broadcast, etc. A risk assessment must be made on whether the meeting should be cancelled altogether, compelled to include an opposing speaker or (even more creepy) someone in the audience to monitor the event. Scroll down for video Institutions will be obliged to promote British values. These are defined as democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance for those with different faiths and beliefs. Vocal and active opposition to any of these is now officially described as extremism. Given authoritys general scorn for conservative Christianity, and its quivering, obsequious fear of Islam, it is easy to see how the second half will be applied in practice. As for democracy, plenty of people (me included) are not at all sure we have it, and wouldnt be that keen on it if we did. Am I then an extremist who should be kept from speaking at colleges? Quite possibly. But the same paragraph (89, as it happens) goes further. We expect institutions to encourage students to respect other people with particular regard to the protected characteristics set out in the Equality Act 2010. These protected characteristics, about which we must be careful not to be extremist, are in fact the pillars of political correctness including disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, sex and sexual orientation. The Bill is terrible in many other ways. And there is no reason to believe that any of these measures would have prevented any of the terrorist murders here or abroad, or will do so in future. They have been lifted out of the box marked try this on the Home Secretary during a national panic, by officials who long to turn our free society into a despotism. Once, there would have been enough wise, educated, grown-up people in both Houses of Parliament to stand up against this sort of spasm. Now most legislators go weak at the knees like simpering teenage groupies whenever anyone from the Security or Intelligence services demands more power and more money. So far there has been nothing but a tiny mouse-squeak of protest against this dangerous, anti-British, concrete-headed twaddle. It will go through. And in ten years time well wonder why were locking people up for thinking. Well ask: How did that happen? This is how it happens. Finally a film that's got it right For once, a film about real events that comes close to getting it right. The Theory Of Everything, a fictionalised but broadly true account of the marriage of Professor Stephen Hawking and his first wife Jane, is intelligent and profound, irresistibly moving and surprisingly funny in places. The recent past is subtly recreated. The plot pivots on the extraordinary fact that Mrs Hawking an academic in her own right maintained a Christian belief despite her husbands active atheism. The Theory Of Everything starring Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones (above) is intelligent and profound, irresistibly moving and surprisingly funny in places +2 The Theory Of Everything starring Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones (above) is intelligent and profound, irresistibly moving and surprisingly funny in places Eddie Redmayne is Stephen Hawking in The Theory of Everything Their marriage, her selfless love despite his illness, the marriages eventual breakdown, the dreadful contrast between Hawkings soaring mind and his collapsing, failing body, must constantly have challenged the deepest beliefs of both of them. Eddie Redmayne is, of course, superb as he inhabits the professors life and becomes him. But Felicity Jones is even better, and, rather surprisingly, manages to portray Jane as an even more remarkable human being than her husband. British values... it's a baffling topic these days You'd never guess just how few homosexuals there were from the way we go on about it. In a spot check to make sure their Christian school was teaching British values, baffled tots in Sunderland were asked by government inspectors about what lesbians do. Almost immediately after this revelation, plans were announced in Manchester for an entire school devoted to homosexual, bisexual and transgender children. Im not actually against such a school, if enough people want it. Let a hundred flowers bloom, as far as Im concerned. Lets have atheist schools, too, and see how they work out. But if we can select pupils on the grounds of their sexual orientation, why is it illegal to select on the grounds of ability? Something wrong here, surely? As for the lesbian question, I was 12 before I even knew what a call-girl was, let alone a lesbian, and look how I turned out not to mention my grasp of British values. Lethal cost of the great crime lie Somehow the Government has so far kept the lid on the fact that despite fiddled figures claiming that crime is dropping, our prisons are full, and exploding with violence, gang rivalry and drugs. Prison officers, the main civilising influence in these dreadful liberal institutions, are in growing danger of severe violence. Ten are attacked every day. On Radio 4s File On 4 on Tuesday, Peter McParlin, the chairman of the Prison Officers Association, said: I wake up every morning thinking, Today is the day one of my colleagues will be murdered in their work. This crisis is the result of 50 years of Left-wing failure, which has ensured that wrongdoers dont encounter serious punishment until they are already hardened criminals. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2915032/PETER-HITCHENS-Don- t-like-PC-mob-makes-terror-threat.html#ixzz3PGs7m9yk Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#1. To: Ada (#0)
This is why democracies don't work. Hamilton said: "We are a Republican Government. Real liberty is never found in despotism or in the extremes of Democracy." And Samuel Adams warned: "Remember, Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself! There never was a democracy that did not commit suicide." James Madison, one of the members of the convention who was charged with drawing up our Constitution, wrote as follows: Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. So I guess I am an "extremist" since I am virulently opposed to a system of government that has never worked and can't be made to work.
This country is in its death throes, and unless extreme, immediate political triage is applied, it will cease to exist.
I agree with you. I have been saying for some time now that America is on its last spin around the bowl. And the bottom of the bowl seems to be getting very close.
There are no replies to Comment # 3. End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|